Arizona · Nonprofit
RESOURCE CONSERVATION CAMPAIGN
RESOURCE CONSERVATION CAMPAIGN (Arizona) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $205,018 to it, the largest being Feeding America's Hungry Children ($62,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
RESOURCE CONSERVATION CAMPAIGN's funding base is broadening — from 1 funders to 3 as grant income climbed.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 5,965 animals nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2022
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- The United Way of the Greater Dayton Areashared funders
- Closehaul Capital Charitable Incportfolio match
- Dj and T Foundationportfolio match
Who funds it, year by year
2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $0 → $20k.
2 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 14% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of RESOURCE CONSERVATION CAMPAIGN’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 8 of 9 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
RESOURCE CONSERVATION CAMPAIGN leans on a few funders — its largest provides 30% of grant income and the top three 72%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund RESOURCE CONSERVATION CAMPAIGN.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 99% · 2021 100% · 2022 37% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How long its funders stay
38% of RESOURCE CONSERVATION CAMPAIGN's funders are still giving 1 year after their first grant; 56% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.
Where its funders are
100% of RESOURCE CONSERVATION CAMPAIGN's grant income comes from Arizona funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $28k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 9 funders put you well-backed among the 400 organizations that share them.
- The United Way of the Greater Dayton Areashared fundersOH · backs 27 organizations that share your funders
- Closehaul Capital Charitable Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Dj and T Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Project Animalaidportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Wags and Menace Make a Difference Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Ahimsa Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Candis J Stern Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Mika Foundation Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Peace 4 Animalsportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Humane World for Animals Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Martha Morse Beck Von Peccoz Animal Plcportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Kathryn G Favre Charitable Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like RESOURCE CONSERVATION CAMPAIGN
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Arizona
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
97% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
0%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for RESOURCE CONSERVATION CAMPAIGN: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds RESOURCE CONSERVATION CAMPAIGN?
- RESOURCE CONSERVATION CAMPAIGN (Arizona) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $205,018 to it, the largest being Feeding America's Hungry Children ($62,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does RESOURCE CONSERVATION CAMPAIGN have?
- IRS filings report 9 organizations giving $205,018 in grants to RESOURCE CONSERVATION CAMPAIGN, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of RESOURCE CONSERVATION CAMPAIGN?
- Feeding America's Hungry Children is the largest funder on record, with $62,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like RESOURCE CONSERVATION CAMPAIGN find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Arizona. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2022 (financials across 2022–2022), and the filings of 9funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing