Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST

SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST (Washington) receives grants from 152 organizations whose IRS filings report $21,664,218 to it, the largest being Feeding America ($5,350,199). 83 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$152M
Funders on record
152
Grants received
$22M
Net assets
$18M
83/152 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 4%
01What it does

What Second Harvest Inland Northwest does

Mission

Fighting hunger, feeding hope: second harvest brings community resources together to feed people in need through empowerment, education, and partnerships.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Washington produce program: second harvest distributes surplus fresh bulk produce donations to other feeding america network members.

    $77,219,455 spentof which $77,219,455 as grants
    49% of program spending
  2. Warehousing: second harvest has been the hub for charitable food distributions in the inland northwest for more than 50 years. Second harvest provides more than 3.1 million pounds of fresh produce, dairy products, meat, canned goods, and other food every month that helps hungry families and seniors living in 21 eastern washington and 5 north idaho counties. The food feeds a diverse group of children and adults who have been impacted by job losses, wage reductions, illnesses, disabilities, and other challenges. Second harvest leverages community contributions to pick up large truckloads of donated food. Volunteers sort and repackage bulk food donations that are distributed to 250 partner agencies/ meal programs. Second harvest, in conjunction with its partner agencies, serves 80,000 meals every day.

    $76,745,757 spentof which $70,817,913 as grants$183,107 earned by the program
    48% of program spending
  3. Tefap: the organization distributes surplus food made available by the federal government to low income and temporarily needy families in the community.

    $4,173,316 spentof which $3,581,296 as grants
    3% of program spending
  4. Nutrition education: the organization provides hands-on cooking classes, demonstrations, and food samples to clients to increase food literacy and healthy eating habits. The organization's training and technical assistance for partner food banks empowers them to reach more clients with nutrition education as well.

    $425,579 spent
    0% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $158,564,107.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($104M) Expenses 100 ($105M) Net assets 100 ($11M)2018 Revenue 106 ($110M) Expenses 105 ($110M) Net assets 97 ($11M)2019 Revenue 92 ($96M) Expenses 89 ($93M) Net assets 121 ($14M)2020 Revenue 128 ($134M) Expenses 119 ($125M) Net assets 199 ($22M)2021 Revenue 160 ($167M) Expenses 150 ($157M) Net assets 287 ($33M)2022 Revenue 106 ($111M) Expenses 109 ($114M) Net assets 253 ($29M)2023 Revenue 131 ($137M) Expenses 131 ($138M) Net assets 246 ($28M)2024 Revenue 145 ($151M) Expenses 145 ($152M) Net assets 240 ($27M)2025 Revenue 146 ($152M) Expenses 154 ($161M) Net assets 160 ($18M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (146)Expenses (154)Net assets (160)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $24M to $34M (+39%).

$12M
$12M
$15M
$24M
$34M
$30M
$29M
$28M
$19M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 3% · 2018 2% · 2019 5% · 2020 4% · 2021 12% · 2022 8% · 2023 5% · 2024 3% · 2025 3%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (97% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 40 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$427k
’17
−$302k
’18
$2.6M
’19
$8.8M
’20
$10M
’21
−$3.8M
’22
−$834k
’23
−$767k
’24
−$9.4M
’25
0.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Jason Clark

CEO

Board chair

Ken Anderson

Chairperson

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed161817141617162122
Joined·+4+0+0+3+6+2+9+3
No longer listed·21315342
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 32 funders to 56 funders, grant income rose $698k → $2.0M.

29 of 152 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 30% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $85k from 2 payers (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Feeding Washington). These are real filings, and they are not money SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST raised.

From the IRS filings of SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 152 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 25% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

81% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST.

25%
largest funder
46%
top three
~11
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 34% · 2018 25% · 2019 37% · 2020 40% · 2021 23% · 2022 19% · 2023 34% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

39% of SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 55% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST draws 61% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, across 28 states in all.

AK
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
MO
VA
DE
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $6.4M arriving through sponsors registered in 18 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST's funding base is broadening — from 32 funders to 56 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−6% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve0.2mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)5% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 31 food & nutrition nonprofits over $100M, FY2025

Organizations like SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

98% of spending goes to programs.

Program 98%Management 1%Fundraising 1%

Governance

14
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 2 related entities

  • Feeding Washington · exempt
  • Second Harvest Inland Northwest Foundation · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST?
SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST (Washington) receives grants from 152 organizations whose IRS filings report $21,664,218 to it, the largest being Feeding America ($5,350,199). 83 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST have?
IRS filings report 152 organizations giving $21,664,218 in grants to SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST, 83 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST?
Feeding America is the largest funder on record, with $5,350,199 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 152 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing