Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Kitsap County

UNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTYs mission is providing our community with resources and volunteers for a better tomorrow.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$688kPhilanthropy$524kHuman Services$462kArts & Culture$109kAnimals$99kFood & Nutrition$70kEnvironment$45kInternational$33kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$75,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UP FROM SLAVERY INITIATIVE$75,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $306k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $14k → 14%PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE: $22k → 17%HOLLY RIDGE CENTER: $9k → 10%PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE: $20k → 17%SOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE: $27k → 10%UP FROM SLAVERY INITIATIVE: $75k → 10%COFFEE OASIS: $39k → 10%KITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $30k → 10%COFFEE OASIS: $11k → 10%KITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $9k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $8k → 10%COFFEE OASIS: $5k → 10%KITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $5k → 10%NORTH KITSAP FISHLINE: $21k → 10%COFFEE OASIS: $5k → 10%CHILDREN OF THE NATIONS: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
CA
MD
TN
DC
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$807k · 7 repeat orgs$979k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +99% since the first grant, against -42% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
45

Total granted

$807k
$904k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+99%
-42%

Still filing today

86%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyAnimalsFood & NutritionHealthHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KM
    KITSAP MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
    4× · 2017–2021 · $502k · revenue +153%
  • THE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $109k · revenue +14%
  • TC
    THE COFFEE OASIS
    4× · 2017–2021 · $60k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTY
    one grant, 2017 · $179k · revenue -61%
  • CC
    CHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES
    one grant, 2017 · $58k · revenue -49%
  • MF
    MILITARY FAMILY AND VETERANS SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2017 · $43k · revenue -86%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community First - America's Charities

To support, and be organized and operate to promote and support the activities and purposes of other 501(c)(3)organizations that assist children, families, adults & communities by providing services that further their exempt purposes.

Philanthropy
2
Americas Best Charities

Americas best charities raises funds and awareness to improve life both locally and globally by aiding our diverse partner charities and encouraging supporters to contribute to their cause.

Philanthropy
3
Kitsap Legal Services

Providing and facilitating access to justice in kitsap county for low-income individuals or marginalized communities through advocacy and free civil legal services.

Crime & Legal
4
Children's Advocacy Centers of Washington

Children's advocacy centers of washington is a membership organization that provides support to communities that have formed or wish to form a children's advocacy center and promotes awareness of the incidence and impact of child abuse in…

Youth Development
5
Washington State Child Care Resource & Referral Network Dba Child Care Aware Wa

Child care aware of washington provides thorough and independent information and support for families seeking quality child care, for child care programs seeking to improve quality, and for effective policy making.

—
6
Chc Creating Healthier Communities Local

We envision a world where every person in every community has an opportunity to live their healthiest life.

—
7
Animal Welfare Fund Inc

We work with other not-for-profit organizations to help them increase their participation and success in public-sector workplace charitable fund drives. The federation screens applications for such drives, assists with the transfer of…

Animals
8
Housing Connector

Housing connector partners with property owners and managers to lower barriers to housing and increase our region's affordable housing capacity.

Housing & Shelter
9
Massachusetts Council of Community Hospitals Inc

Support the advocacy of community hospitals.

Health
10
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
11
California Coast Credit Union

California coast credit union (credit union) is a cooperative, organized for the purpose of promoting thrift and savings among its members, creating a source of credit for them at rates of interest set by the board of directors, and…

—
12
Citizen Action Defense Fund

To sustain, defend and provide the means to preserve the individual constitutional rights of all washingtonians, including freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, freedom of association, freedom of movement, due…

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women Children and Family Service Charities of America and the most unlike its peers is Kitsap Black Student Union. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyInternational Development a…Independent Elementary Scho…Animal Rescue and AdoptionSupportive Housing & Servic…Food Banks & Emergency Assi…Medical Research & Patient …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr19%36%20–35yr13%36%35–55yr12%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%5%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%2%10–20yr19%31%20–35yr13%47%35–55yr12%15%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%2/56
the rest of the field
13%
2,113/16,574

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/51
Grantees still filing
24/51
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KITSAP MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES — $502,086 · OtherKITSAP MENTAL HEALTH SERVICESTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION — $108,505 · OtherTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATIONCHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES — $58,368 · OtherCHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIESMILITARY FAMILY AND VETERANS SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS OF AMERICA — $43,314 · Other+24 more — $303,723 · Other+24 moreKITSAP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $307,646 · PhilanthropyKITSAP COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONUNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTY — $179,168 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTYHEALTH & MEDICAL RESEARCH CHARITIES OF AMERICA — $37,883 · PhilanthropyHEALTH & MEDICAL RESEARCH CHARI…+6 more — $66,268 · Philanthropy+6 moreUp From Slavery Initiative — $75,000 · Human ServicesUp From Slavery In…THE COFFEE OASIS — $60,461 · Human ServicesTHE COFFEE OASISKITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCES — $44,656 · Human ServicesKITSAP COMMUNITY R…PEOPLE FOR PEOPLE — $41,667 · Human ServicesPEOPLE FOR PEOPLESOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE — $26,576 · Human ServicesSOUTH KITSAP HELPL…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $22,656 · Human ServicesAmerican National …NORTH KITSAP FISHLINE — $21,154 · Human ServicesNORTH KITSAP FISHL…CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON — $20,285 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC COMMUNITY…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $14,254 · Human Services+2 more — $14,350 · Human ServicesKITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY — $35,786 · AnimalsANIMAL CHARITIES OF AMERICA — $35,342 · AnimalsANIMAL RESCUE FAMILIES — $12,610 · AnimalsPAWS OF BREMERTON — $9,988 · AnimalsCentral Kitsap Food Bank — $31,014 · Food & NutritionBREMERTON SERVICES ASSOCIATION — $12,359 · Food & NutritionKITSAP BLACK STUDENT UNION — $16,309 · Youth DevelopmentGlobal Impact — $15,653 · International
Other$1,015,996Philanthropy$590,965Human Services$341,059Animals$93,726Food & Nutrition$43,373Youth Development$16,309International$15,653

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKITSAP MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES — $502,086 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetKITSAP COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $307,646 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF KITSAP COUNTY — $179,168 over 1y, 9.5% of budgetTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION — $108,505 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUp From Slavery Initiative — $75,000 over 1y, 48% of budgetTHE COFFEE OASIS — $60,461 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetCHC CREATING HEALTHIER COMMUNITIES — $58,368 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKITSAP COMMUNITY RESOURCES — $44,656 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMILITARY FAMILY AND VETERANS SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS OF AMERICA — $43,314 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPEOPLE FOR PEOPLE — $41,667 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTH & MEDICAL RESEARCH CHARITIES OF AMERICA — $37,883 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKITSAP HUMANE SOCIETY — $35,786 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetANIMAL CHARITIES OF AMERICA — $35,342 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCentral Kitsap Food Bank — $31,014 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCANCERCURE OF AMERICA- CARE UNDERSTAND RESEARCH & END — $27,809 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBremerton Foodline — $26,868 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetSOUTH KITSAP HELPLINE — $26,576 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $22,656 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH KITSAP FISHLINE — $21,154 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF WESTERN WASHINGTON — $20,285 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKITSAP BLACK STUDENT UNION — $16,309 over 1y, 14% of budgetGlobal Impact — $15,653 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS CHARITIES OF AMERICA — $15,111 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $14,254 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN FIRST - AMERICA'S CHARITIES — $13,153 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICA'S CHARITIES — $13,120 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE FAMILIES — $12,610 over 1y, 28% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KITSAP COUNTY — $12,571 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDRENS MED RES CHARITIES OF AMER DBA CHILDRENS MED & RES CHAR OF AMER — $12,553 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBREMERTON SERVICES ASSOCIATION — $12,359 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCONSERVATION & PRESERVATION CHARITIES OF AMERICA DBA CONSERVE NOW — $11,943 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMILITARY SUPPORT GROUPS OF AMERICA — $11,833 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHRISTIAN CHARITIES USA — $11,783 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPAWS OF BREMERTON — $9,988 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetCHARITY WITHOUT BORDERS — $9,331 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWOMEN CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE CHARITIES OF AMERICA — $9,168 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCATHOLIC SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS OF AMERICA — $8,830 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHOLLY RIDGE CENTER — $8,655 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMEDICAL RESEARCH CHARITIES INC — $8,424 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJEFFERSON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHEALTH FIRST - AMERICA'S CHARITIES — $7,622 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $7,436 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetEDUCATE AMERICATHE EDUCATION SCHOOL SUPPORT AND SCHOLARSHIP FUNDS COALITION — $7,394 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAS BEST LOCAL CHARITIES — $6,768 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAS MOST COST EFFECTIVE CHARITIES — $6,232 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCHILDREN OF THE NATIONS — $5,695 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKITSAP SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER — $5,516 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Give Back FoundationFederal Employees Sup…United Way of Greater…The United Way of the…United Way of South H…The United Way of Cen…Campaigning for Chari…United Way of Greater…United Way of Central…Rappahannock United W…United Way California…United Way of Tucson …
Give Back FoundationWI62.2× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Give Back Foundation · Federal Employees Support for Cfc Charitable Giving Incorporated · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The United Way of the Greater Dayton Area · United Way of South Hampton Roads · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Campaigning for Charities · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · United Way of Central Ohio Inc · Rappahannock United Way Inc · United Way California Capital Region · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Kitsap County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home