· Community foundation
Colorado Gives Foundation
We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2,211 grants below total $90,980,931 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $96,609,331 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $5,628,400 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k627 grants · $4.6M
- $10k–50k1144 grants · $27M
- $50k–250k403 grants · $40M
- $250k+37 grants · $20M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VITALANT | $2,210,186 |
| FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES | $1,528,984 |
| JEFFERSON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH | $1,364,508 |
| THE ACTION CENTER | $871,187 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS INC | $855,620 |
| DENVER RESCUE MISSION | $833,245 |
| GJ BLACKOUT | $713,506 |
| THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY | $636,595 |
| ST ANNES EPISCOPAL SCHOOL INC | $546,843 |
| HUMANE COLORADO | $538,607 |
| ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC | $537,044 |
| SUCCESS FOUNDATION SERVING GREELEY-EVANS SCHOOLS INC | $530,558 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC | $518,703 |
| PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC | $513,882 |
| REGIS JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL | $506,588 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $52.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
1897 repeat relationships — 1663 still active in FY2024, 234 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.8M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VVitalant8× · 2017–2024 · $13M · revenue +54%
- FBFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES8× · 2017–2024 · $9.9M · revenue +74%
- JCJEFFERSON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH8× · 2017–2024 · $6.6M · revenue +36%
Funded once
- CPCOLORADO PAY IT FORWARD FUNDone grant, 2023 · $2.0M
- HFHabitat For Humanity International Inc Habitat for Humanity of Montezuma Countygraduatedone grant, 2023 · $408k · revenue +67%
- TMTHE MICHAEL PHELPS FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $400k · revenue +97% · 59% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
Healthier colorado is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to raising the voices of coloradans in the public policy process to improve the health of our state's residents. we believe that every coloradan should have a fair…
Rocky Mountain Values is a Colorado non-profit organization that is made up of real Coloradans fighting to make sure that we can all earn a good living and have a good life no matter our zip code.
The Colorado Democracy Alliance is an organization committed to protecting democracy and expanding Colorados civic engagement ecosystem.
Promote the general interest of daily, weekly, and monthly newspapers and online publications, improve editorials and business methods of daily and weekly newspapers, and advance those newspapers' usefulness and influence in the public…
The mission of USA Triathlon of Colorado (USAT) is to grow, inspire, and support the triathlon community.
Denver Press Club has provided a business setting that has fostered an environment which promotes healthy business relationships. In addition, the organization provides scholarships promoting journalism and events that benefits the Arts,…
Provide affordable cooperative housing to the people of Boulder County, Colorado.
Improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.
a member based state association of over 100 companies targeting meeting planners & incentive buyers. members include bureaus, hotels, resorts, destination management companies, activity companies, & other meeting services. we are…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthy Child Care Colorado and the most unlike its peers is La Clinica Tepeyac. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1925 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1925 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Vitalant ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION BOULDER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds JEFFERSON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds JEFFCO ACTION CENTER INC THE ACTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
- Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES & COMMUNITY SERV OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds COLORADO OPEN GOLF FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INTERMOUNTAIN FRONT RANGE INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds ARMA DEI ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds Colorado Coalition for the Homeless ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC ↗
- Who funds Colorado Healing Fund ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
- Who funds THE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds St Anne's Episcopal School Inc ↗
- Who funds HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN DENVER ↗
- Who funds URBAN PEAK DENVER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES OF BROOMFIELD ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE RISE SCHOOL OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds METRO CARING ↗
- Who funds Food For Thought Denver ↗
- Who funds EVERGREEN CHRISTIAN OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds The Food Bank for Larimer County ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Anschutz Family Foundation · Schlessman Foundation Inc · Hill Foundation Wells Fargo Bank Na · The Colorado Health Foundation · Boettcher Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Anschutz Foundation · Caring for Colorado Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · The Colorado Trust · Nathan B & Florence R Burt Foundation · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Colorado Gives Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.