Loading…
Loading…
Colorado · Nonprofit
THE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE (Colorado) is funded by 59 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $6,445,910 in grants to it, the largest being TARGET FOUNDATION ($1,997,800). 38 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
THE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE has grown faster than half of the 323 international nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 323 international nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
16% of THE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (97% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
$48k from 3 funders in 2025, up from $175k and 15 in 2017.
21 of 59 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 26% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of THE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 59 funders by total. Association, not causation.
THE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 31% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 23% · 2018 20% · 2019 33% · 2020 15% · 2021 64% · 2022 47% · 2023 13% · 2024 60% · 2025 83% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
53% of THE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 64% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
THE FRIENDSHIP BRIDGE draws 68% of its grant income from funders outside Colorado — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 22 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 59 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
92% of spending goes to programs.
65%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 4 states
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 59funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing