Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

Colorado · Nonprofit

BRIDGING HOPE INC

BRIDGING HOPE INC (Colorado) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $229,147 to it, the largest being COMMUNITY FIRST FOUNDATION ($151,094). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 79% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$326k
Revenue FY2025
5
Funders on record
$229k
Grants received
$339k
Net assets
3/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 26%

Against its field

BRIDGING HOPE INC runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 2,211 international nonprofits its size.

Operating margin32% · top quartile
Months of reserve18.3mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)5% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,211 international nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($239k) Expenses 100 ($235k) Net assets 100 ($282k)2020 Revenue 100 ($238k) Expenses 112 ($262k) Net assets 92 ($258k)2021 Revenue 124 ($296k) Expenses 96 ($225k) Net assets 117 ($330k)2022 Revenue 111 ($265k) Expenses 108 ($254k) Net assets 121 ($340k)2023 Revenue 109 ($260k) Expenses 122 ($286k) Net assets 111 ($314k)2024 Revenue 84 ($202k) Expenses 119 ($280k) Net assets 84 ($236k)2025 Revenue 136 ($326k) Expenses 95 ($223k) Net assets 120 ($339k)
2019202020212022202320242025
Revenue (136)Expenses (95)Net assets (120)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of BRIDGING HOPE INC’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (100% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,956 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$5k
19
$23k
20
$71k
21
$10k
22
$26k
23
$77k
24
$103k
25
18
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income fell $18k → $14k.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
funders
1
1
1
3
3
5
2
1

3 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)79% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of BRIDGING HOPE INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

BRIDGING HOPE INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 66% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

79% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund BRIDGING HOPE INC.

66%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2020 52% · 2021 99% · 2022 44% · 2023 99%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

79% of BRIDGING HOPE INC's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $48k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from funders outside Colorado, across 2 states.

WI
CT

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

20
21
22
Colorado out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $181k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 statesis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like BRIDGING HOPE INC

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Colorado

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

82% of spending goes to programs.

Program 82%Management 18%Fundraising 0%

Governance

6
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for BRIDGING HOPE INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds BRIDGING HOPE INC?
BRIDGING HOPE INC (Colorado) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $229,147 to it, the largest being COMMUNITY FIRST FOUNDATION ($151,094). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 79% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does BRIDGING HOPE INC have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $229,147 in grants to BRIDGING HOPE INC, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of BRIDGING HOPE INC?
COMMUNITY FIRST FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $151,094 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like BRIDGING HOPE INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Colorado. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2019–2025), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing