Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$20M
Granted FY2025still arriving
486
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.

Education$43MHuman Services$24MHealth$13MYouth Development$3.5MPublic Benefit$2.3MArts & Culture$2.0MEmployment$1.5MCommunity Improvement$1.4MOther$0
02FY2025 · 486 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k92 grants · $430k
  • $10k–50k255 grants · $6.2M
  • $50k–250k136 grants · $12M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
$25,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$477M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLORADO FORUM FUND INC$1,000,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE SAN LUI$300,000
VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION INC$250,000
COLORADO STATEWIDE PARENT COALITION$220,000
STRATTON AREA FOUNDATION 2 INC$220,000
EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL LEADERSHIP$200,000
COLORADO COMMUNITY COLLEGE SYSTEM F$200,000
TLC LEARNING CENTER$200,000
RESILIENT COMMUNITIES RESILIENT FUT$185,000
CLAYTON EARLY LEARNING TRUSTEE GEOR$175,000
CENTENNIAL MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC$170,000
WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION$166,666
HEALTH SOLUTIONS$165,000
EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL SAN LUIS VA$150,000
WILD BEAR NATURE CENTER$150,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $16.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BRIGHT FUTURES: $123k → 7%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE O: $90k → 15%YOUNG TRACKS INC: $102k → 6%BRIGHT FUTURES: $123k → 7%HOLYOKE COMMUNITY CHILDCARE INITIATIVE: $400k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE O: $90k → 15%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF THE SAN: $150k → 17%MOUNTAIN VALLEY DEVELOPMENTAL SERVI: $98k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE O: $90k → 15%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF THE SAN LUIS VALLEY: $150k → 17%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF THE SAN LUIS VALLEY - MENTAL HEALTH CONSULTATION: $150k → 17%LOGAN COUNTY CHILDCARE COLLABORATIVE: $100k → 15%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL SAN LUIS VA: $150k → 17%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF THE SAN: $100k → 17%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF THE SAN LUIS VALLEY: $100k → 17%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF THE SAN: $100k → 17%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF THE SAN LUIS VALLEY: $100k → 17%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF THE SAN: $100k → 17%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE: $250k → 7%EARLY CONNECTIONS LEARNING CENTERS: $400k → 9%HEALTHY CHILD CARE COLORADO: $150k → 12%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE: $100k → 7%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF LARIMER COUNTY: $150k → 11%HEALTHY CHILD CARE COLORADO: $150k → 12%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE: $100k → 7%COLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENT: $90k → 9%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF LARIMER COUNTY: $150k → 11%HEALTHY CHILD CARE COLORADO: $150k → 12%EARLY CONNECTIONS LEARNING CENTERS: $90k → 9%WE HELP AND LOVE EVERYONE INC (WH: $100k → 9%HEALTHY CHILD CARE COLORADO: $150k → 12%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE: $100k → 7%EARLY CONNECTIONS LEARNING CENTERS: $90k → 9%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF LARIMER COUNTY: $150k → 11%HEALTHY CHILD CARE COLORADO: $125k → 12%HEALTHY CHILD CARE COLORADO: $125k → 12%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF LARIMER COUNTY: $150k → 11%HEALTHY CHILD CARE COLORADO: $115k → 12%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF BOULDER COUNTY: $137k → 12%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF BOULDER COUNTY: $137k → 12%HEALTHY CHILD CARE COLORADO: $100k → 12%HEALTHY CHILD CARE COLORADO: $100k → 12%EARLY CHILDHOOD PARTNERS: $100k → 7%HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $200k → 7%EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF BOULDER: $110k → 12%WARREN VILLAGE: $150k → 12%HEALTHY CHILD CARE COLORADO: $250k → 12%HEALTHY CHILD CARE COLORADO: $100k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
IL
NY
WY
IN
CA
CO
KY
AZ
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$79M · 498 repeat orgs$18M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

498 repeat relationships — 303 still active in FY2025, 195 since wound down; 89 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

498
272

Total granted

$79M
$13M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+1%

Still filing today

62%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF THE SAN LUIS VALLEY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +43%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +2%
  • HS
    HEALTH SOLUTIONS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $885k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FNDN BUELL EARLY CHILDHOOD LEADERSHIP PROGRAM
    one grant, 2021 · $460k
  • HC
    Holyoke Community Childcare
    one grant, 2022 · $400k · revenue -27% · 68% of their budget
  • MA
    MASLOW ACADEMY AND BRIGHT BEGINNINGS
    one grant, 2022 · $320k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Center Inc

Early childhood education

Education
2
Early Childhood University

The organization's mission is to provide low-cost preschool and daycare services for low-income families in the greeley, colorado, area.

Education
3
The Rise School of Denver

The purpose of the Rise School of Denver is to provide the highest quality inclusive early childhood education and therapy for children with and without developmental disabilities. We do this by providing exemplary school- and clinic-based…

Education
4
High Rockies Community School

Our mission is to provide individualized educational options where students and teachers engage in playful, exploratory learning by creating a culture of collaboration in a safe, diverse, multi-age environment. Our students are encouraged…

Education
5
Early Childhood Collective of Douglas County Inc

Early Childhood Collective connects the coalition of early childhood resources that serves growing families in Douglas County. ECCo serves as the fiscal agent and administrative hub for community-based early childhood programs that provide…

Education
6
Copper Community Childcare

Our mission is to provide an immersive learning experience that empowers children to be active, engaged learners who appreciate the beauty and intricacies of the natural world. We believe that parents are an integral part of their childs…

Education
7
Colorado Learning Connections

Through individualized learning and responsive mentoring, we inspire, guide and empower students and families.

Education
8
Denver Center Child Care Association Dba Junior Jets

Our philosophy relects our commitment to creating programs that adjust to the developmental needs of children. we are committed to setting and maintaining the highest standards that reflect innovative thinking in the child development…

Human Services
9
Eagle River Valley Childcare

Eagle river valley childcare is strategically designed to address the childcare supply and affordability issues in the eagle county, colorado community.

Human Services
10
Denver Cooperative Preschool

Preschool programs for children

Education
11
Albuquerque Preschool Cooperative

To provide quality pre-school education and childcare for children ages 2 to 6 years old in an un-hurried, pressure-free environment.

Education
12
Stride Learning Center

To provide comprehensive, quality services for children with special needs and their families in a safe and compassionate environment so that they may achieve their fullest potential.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthy Child Care Colorado and the most unlike its peers is Lifelong Learning of Estes Valley. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPrivate Philanthropic Found…Affordable Housing & Suppor…Industry Trade AssociationsInternational Christian Min…Youth Development & Mentori…Social Justice Legal Advoca…Animal Rescue and WelfareVulnerable Population Suppo…Food Access and SecurityAmateur Sports OrganizationsOutdoor Conservation Educat…Arts and Cultural Organizat…Child Welfare & Adoption Se…Behavioral Health ServicesYouth Education Programs
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%4%<5yr15%8%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr17%30%20–35yr11%24%35–55yr13%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%2%<5yr15%7%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr17%28%20–35yr11%28%35–55yr13%20%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%11/477
the rest of the field
13%
3,485/25,840

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

427 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 427 of the 871 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

13
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
70
Early backer (in before they grew)
412/427
Grantees still filing
269/427
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL LEADERSHIP — $945,000 · Other+98 more — $27,256,713 · Other+98 moreHEALTHY CHILD CARE COLORADO — $1,735,000 · Human ServicesHEALTHY CHILD CARE COLORAD…EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF THE SAN LUIS VALLEY INC — $1,100,000 · Human ServicesEARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF…COLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC — $830,000 · Human ServicesCOLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NUR…FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ASSOCIATION — $614,000 · Human ServicesNORTHERN COLORADO KIDS THRIVE — $600,000 · Human ServicesEARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE INC — $565,000 · Human ServicesEARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF BOULDER COUNTY — $563,000 · Human Services+34 more — $9,077,285 · Human Services+34 moreUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $1,071,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO …DENVER EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL — $941,527 · EducationDENVER EARLY CHILDHOOD …Early Childhood Partnership of Adams Cou — $697,812 · EducationARAPAHOE COUNTY EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL INC — $690,000 · EducationEARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF LA PLATA COUNTY INC — $590,000 · EducationGRAND BEGINNINGS — $565,000 · EducationVALLEY SETTLEMENT — $561,000 · EducationPARENT POSSIBLE — $546,800 · EducationFAMILY STAR INC — $490,000 · EducationTINY TIM CENTER INC DBA TLC LEARNING CENTER — $450,000 · Education+26 more — $6,770,810 · Education+26 moreHEALTH SOLUTIONS — $885,000 · HealthNORTH RANGE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $540,000 · HealthJEFFERSON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH — $480,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation — $433,000 · HealthROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $425,000 · HealthTRAILHEAD INSTITUTE — $425,000 · HealthABILITY CONNECTION COLORADO INC — $410,000 · HealthHILLTOP HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION — $270,000 · HealthTHE ARCHER GROUP — $264,125 · HealthARAPAHOE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER — $239,333 · HealthCommunity Coalition for Families and Children — $213,000 · HealthAURORA COMPREHENSIVE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $176,000 · Health+2 more — $319,245 · HealthGIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER — $344,000 · Youth DevelopmentINVEST IN KIDS — $240,000 · Youth DevelopmentCONNECTIONS 4 KIDS — $228,650 · Youth DevelopmentREACH OUT AND READ COLORADO — $225,000 · Youth DevelopmentFOCUSEDKIDS — $153,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOLORADO FORUM FUND INC — $1,000,000 · Social ScienceTHE CHILDRENS MUSEUM OF DENVER INC — $300,000 · Arts & CultureROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $195,000 · Arts & CultureCOLORADO HUMANITIES — $190,000 · Arts & CultureCENTRAL CITY OPERA HOUSE ASSOCIATION — $160,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$28,201,713Human Services$15,084,285Education$13,373,949Health$5,079,703Youth Development$1,190,650Social Science$1,000,000Arts & Culture$845,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHEALTHY CHILD CARE COLORADO — $1,735,000 over 5y, 34% of budgetEARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF THE SAN LUIS VALLEY INC — $1,100,000 over 5y, 7.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $1,071,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL — $941,527 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetHEALTH SOLUTIONS — $885,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetDENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION — $865,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetCOLORADO CHILDREN'S CAMPAIGN — $850,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetCENTENNIAL MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $830,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCOLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC — $830,000 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetEarly Childhood Partnership of Adams Cou — $697,812 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetARAPAHOE COUNTY EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL INC — $690,000 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetCOLORADO STATEWIDE PARENT COALITION — $638,000 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetFAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ASSOCIATION — $614,000 over 5y, 9.4% of budgetNORTHERN COLORADO KIDS THRIVE — $600,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetEARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF LA PLATA COUNTY INC — $590,000 over 5y, 38% of budgetEARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE INC — $565,000 over 2y, 38% of budgetGRAND BEGINNINGS — $565,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetEARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF BOULDER COUNTY — $563,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetVALLEY SETTLEMENT — $561,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetPARENT POSSIBLE — $546,800 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetNORTH RANGE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $540,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION — $515,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetFAMILY STAR INC — $490,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetJEFFERSON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH — $480,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBRIGHT FUTURES — $461,000 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetTINY TIM CENTER INC DBA TLC LEARNING CENTER — $450,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetSEWALL CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $437,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation — $433,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER — $428,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $425,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTRAILHEAD INSTITUTE — $425,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetWARREN VILLAGE INC — $415,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetFLORENCE CRITTENTON SERVICES OF COLORADO — $413,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetABILITY CONNECTION COLORADO INC — $410,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetEARLY CHILDHOOD PARTNERS INC — $400,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetHolyoke Community Childcare — $400,000 over 1y, 68% of budgetMontessori del Mundo Charter School — $400,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetCommunity Partnership for Child Development — $390,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetGROWING HOME INC — $385,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetRegional Home Visitation Program dba Baby Bear Hugs — $375,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetCIVIC NEWS COMPANY — $375,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHRIVING FAMILIES — $355,000 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF PUEBLO INC — $345,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER — $344,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetHOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO — $336,500 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetHope Center Inc — $330,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetNew Legacy Charter School — $319,300 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetFAMILY VISITOR PROGRAM OF GARFIELD COUNTY INC — $318,000 over 3y, 7.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEALTHY CHILD CARE COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF THE SAN LUIS VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO FORUM FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO CHILDREN'S CAMPAIGN ↗
  • Who funds CENTENNIAL MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Early Childhood Partnership of Adams Cou ↗
  • Who funds ARAPAHOE COUNTY EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO STATEWIDE PARENT COALITION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN COLORADO KIDS THRIVE ↗
  • Who funds EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF LA PLATA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds GRAND BEGINNINGS ↗
  • Who funds EARLY CHILDHOOD COUNCIL OF BOULDER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY SETTLEMENT ↗
  • Who funds PARENT POSSIBLE ↗
  • Who funds NORTH RANGE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds THE WESTERN STOCK SHOW ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY STAR INC ↗
  • Who funds JEFFERSON CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT FUTURES ↗
  • Who funds TINY TIM CENTER INC DBA TLC LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SEWALL CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds TRAILHEAD INSTITUTE ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Caring for Colorado F…Early Milestones Colo…The Colorado Health F…Anschutz Family Found…Rose Community Founda…El Pomar FoundationColorado Gives Founda…Daniels FundThe Denver FoundationGates Family Foundati…The Sam S Bloom Found…The Colorado Trust
Caring for Colorado FoundationCO177.1× affinity112 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Caring for Colorado Foundation · Early Milestones Colorado · The Colorado Health Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Daniels Fund · The Denver Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · The Sam S Bloom Foundation · The Colorado Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    132report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 871 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home