· Private foundation
The Anschutz Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 155 grants below total $37,743,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $70,370,780 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $32,627,780 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k25 grants · $106k
- $10k–50k58 grants · $1.2M
- $50k–250k49 grants · $4.4M
- $250k+23 grants · $32M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| University of Colorado Foundation | $10,000,000 |
| Princeton University | $3,000,000 |
| Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation | $2,000,000 |
| Kent Denver School | $2,000,000 |
| National Western Stock Show Association | $2,000,000 |
| University of Colorado Foundation | $1,400,000 |
| American Museum of Western Art, The | $1,200,000 |
| The Stead School | $1,000,000 |
| Metropolitan State University of Denver Foundation, Inc | $1,000,000 |
| Foundation for a Better Life | $1,000,000 |
| Denver Zoological Foundation, Inc. | $1,000,000 |
| Denver Health Foundation | $1,000,000 |
| Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation | $800,000 |
| Communities of Coastal Georgia Foundation | $759,000 |
| Air Force Academy Foundation | $675,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
281 repeat relationships — 109 still active in FY2024, 172 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.9M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCROSSPURPOSE4× · 2021–2024 · $3.2M · revenue +150%
DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2024 · $2.6M · revenue +1%- KDKENT DENVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL4× · 2021–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +90%
Funded once
- CSCharter Schools Growth Fundone grant, 2023 · $2.0M
- HLHIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCYone grant, 2023 · $1.5M · revenue -29%
- CCColorado Coalition for the Homelessone grant, 2021 · $1.5M
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
To provide timely, credible and accessible analyses of fiscal and economic issues facing colorado to inform public policy debates and promote economic prosperity
The mission of education commission of the states is to advocate for attaining educational excellence for all and to help state leaders identify, develop and implement public policy for education that addresses current and future needs of…
The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…
Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.
To deliver meaningful news, music, and cultural experiences to everyone in colorado using the power of the human voice in all its forms
The mission of the center for legal inclusiveness (cli) is to advance diversity in the legal profession by actively educating and supporting private and public sector legal organizations in their individual campaigns to create cultures of…
Our mission is to empower colorado students to achieve a lifetime of economic understanding and financial freedom. how will we achieve this mission? by providing economic and personal financial education to students through training…
Every child deserves a great educator. pebc works across the nation to prepare outstanding new teachers, help practicing teachers and leaders become exceptional, and shape systems and policies in order to foster vibrant growth and lasting…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Groundfloor Media Foundation D/B/a Getgrounded Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
374 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 374 of the 474 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
- Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR A BETTER LIFE ↗
- Who funds CROSSPURPOSE ↗
- Who funds DSST PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DENVER HEALTH AND HOSPITALS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KENT DENVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN STATE UNIVERSITY OF DENVER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds FOUNTAIN VALLEY SCHOOL OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX MULTISPORT INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC ↗
- Who funds MILE HIGH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds DENVER ZOOLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RANDOM ACTS OF KINDNESS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The STEAD School ↗
- Who funds CITY FUND ↗
- Who funds Aurora Public Schools Foundation ↗
- Who funds US Chamber of Commerce Foundation ↗
- Who funds Sarah Shaw Anschutz Foundation ↗
- Who funds COLORADO METH PROJECT ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES OF COASTAL GEORGIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNIO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AXIS ↗
- Who funds BENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rose Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Daniels Fund · The Colorado Health Foundation · Schlessman Foundation Inc · El Pomar Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Hill Foundation Wells Fargo Bank Na · Gates Family Foundation · Caring for Colorado Foundation · Kenneth Kendal King Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Anschutz Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Anschutz Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.