Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Anschutz Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
314
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Human Services$3.2MEducation$1.5MHousing & Shelter$1.4MFood & Nutrition$1.3MYouth Development$1.1MCrime & Legal$898kHealth$897kArts & Culture$377kOther$0
02FY2025 · 314 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k210 grants · $1.6M
  • $10k–50k104 grants · $1.1M
$8,500
Median grant
10
States reached
$47M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Escuela de Guadalupe$20,000
CASA of Pueblo$15,000
Community Resource Center Inc$15,000
Mountain Family Center$15,000
Craig Hospital Foundation$15,000
Rocky Mountain PBS$15,000
Manna Soup Kitchen$15,000
Boys & Girls Clubs of Pueblo County$15,000
Brothers Redevelopment Inc$12,500
Catholic Charities of Southern Colorado$12,000
BeyondHome$12,000
Pueblo Cooperative Care Center$12,000
Family & Intercultural Resource Center (FIRC)$12,000
Adams County Food Bank$10,000
Safe Passage$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $3.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LINK Inc: $10k → 14%Wellspring Community: $10k → 3%Teller Senior Coalition: $10k → 8%Northern Colorado Veterans Resource Center: $10k → 9%Grand Valley Catholic Outreach Inc: $30k → 11%Custer County Community Sharing Center Inc: $10k → 11%The Family Center - La Familia: $10k → 11%Holyoke Community Childcare Initiative: $10k → 11%Seniors Resource Center: $10k → 12%Jackson County Council on Aging: $13k → 14%Kit Carson Rural Development: $10k → 14%The Family Resource Center: $10k → 15%Kindred Kids Child Advocacy Center Inc: $11k → 17%Tri-County Family Care Center Inc: $10k → 23%Wellspring Community: $10k → 3%Broomfield FISH: $10k → 5%Teller Senior Coalition: $10k → 8%A Woman's Place Inc: $10k → 9%Prairie Family Center Inc: $10k → 11%Seniors Resource Center: $10k → 12%Kit Carson Rural Development: $10k → 14%The Family Resource Center: $10k → 15%Loaves and Fishes Ministries of Fremont County: $10k → 17%Tri-County Family Care Center Inc: $10k → 23%A Precious Child Inc: $10k → 5%Mesa County Partners: $10k → 11%Prairie Family Center: $10k → 11%Colorado East Community Action Agency: $10k → 16%Loaves and Fishes Ministries of Fremont County: $10k → 17%Tri-County Family Care Center Inc: $10k → 23%Community Services of Broomfield Inc: $10k → 5%Family & Intercultural Resource Center (FIRC): $12k → 9%Prairie Family Center: $10k → 11%Colorado East Community Action Agency: $10k → 16%Loaves and Fishes Ministries of Fremont County: $10k → 17%Las Animas Helping Hands: $10k → 27%Broomfield FISH: $10k → 5%Lift-Up of Routt County: $10k → 6%Park County Senior Coalition: $10k → 8%Family & Intercultural Resource Center (FIRC): $10k → 9%Mesa County Partners: $10k → 11%Yuma Children's Academy: $10k → 13%Colorado East Community Action Agency: $10k → 16%Pueblo Cooperative Care Center: $12k → 15%Pueblo Cooperative Care Center: $12k → 15%Pueblo Cooperative Care Center: $12k → 15%Pueblo Cooperative Care Center: $12k → 15%Warren Village Inc: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
IN
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
KS
AR
NC
DC
OK
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of Anschutz Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in CO; read by stated purpose it is 84% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Anschutz Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.0% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$13M · 520 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

520 repeat relationships — 256 still active in FY2025, 264 since wound down; 51 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

520
156

Total granted

$13M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+6%

Still filing today

88%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $413k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    SALISBURY SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $133k · revenue +81%
  • RM
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $115k · revenue +25%
  • LP
    LA PUENTE HOME INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $110k · revenue +331%

Funded once

  • GV
    GRAND VALLEY CATHOLIC OUTREACH INC
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue -10%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue +3%
  • MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Colorado Food Cluster Inc

Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.

Food & Nutrition
2
Colorado Thrives

Colorado Thrives exists to support Coloradans to achieve economic mobility through access to good jobs.

Community Improvement
3
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
4
Sunshine Home Share Colorado

Sunshine home share colorado ensures quality of life for older adults and strengthens communities through a safe home-sharing model, supportive economic empowerment, and connections to resources and services.

Housing & Shelter
5
Denver Community Ventures

To empower low-income families and individuals towards self-sufficiency and independent living.

Housing & Shelter
6
Urban Outreach Denver

Urban Outreach Denver exists to connect people to God and to a community of support by caring for both short-term and long-term needs in the areas of food, clothing, shlter, medical care, education and job preparation.

Human Services
7
Colorado Casa Inc

Colorado CASA is a nonprofit organization that works to strengthen local CASA organizations and advocate for children in the child welfare system.

Civil Rights
8
Colorado Springs Independence Center

We work with people with disabilities, their families and the community to create independence so that all may thrive.

Human Services
9
Colorado Jobs With Justice Inc

Advance workers rights & social justice through building sustained relationships and taking direct action to create concrete change in the lives of working families

Employment
10
Arc of West Central Colorado

The Arc of West Central Colorado is organized exclusively for charitable, religious, educational and scientific purposes, including, for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organizations…

Human Services
11
Summitstone Health Partners

SummitStone provides comprehensive behavioral health services across all care levels: 24/7 crisis services, inpatient and outpatient treatment, housing, residential care, and peer support. We partner with law enforcement, schools, and…

Health
12
Focus Reentry

To promote successful second chances, reduce recidivism, and enhance the well-being and safety of our community.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jackson County Council On Aging. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%3%<5yr15%10%5–10yr21%18%10–20yr17%31%20–35yr12%29%35–55yr13%8%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%1%<5yr15%8%5–10yr21%17%10–20yr17%32%20–35yr12%31%35–55yr13%11%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%5/623
the rest of the field
13%
4,362/32,794

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

606 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 606 of the 731 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
198
Early backer (in before they grew)
601/606
Grantees still filing
431/606
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

+60 more — $2,053,407 · Human Services+60 moreESCUELA DE GUADALUPE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — $165,000 · OtherESCUELA DE GUADALUPE ELEMENTARY SCHOOLLA PUENTE HOME INC — $110,000 · OtherROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $115,000 · Other+75 more — $2,570,392 · Other+75 moreADAMS COUNTY EMERGENCY FOOD BANK — $48,500 · Food & NutritionWELD FOOD BANK — $43,500 · Food & NutritionMOUNTAIN ROOTS FOOD PROJECT — $42,500 · Food & NutritionSAN LUIS VALLEY LOCAL FOODS COALITION — $40,000 · Food & NutritionWEDONTWASTE INC — $40,000 · Food & NutritionColorado Farm to Table Inc — $34,000 · Food & NutritionEARTH MOUNTAIN EDUCATION FARM — $32,220 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC — $32,000 · Food & NutritionSPROUT CITY FARMS — $32,000 · Food & NutritionCOAL CREEK MEALS ON WHEELS — $31,000 · Food & NutritionCapitol Hill Community Services — $31,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR HOPE — $30,500 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS OF LOVELAND AND BERTHOUD INC — $30,000 · Food & NutritionDENVER FOOD RESCUE — $30,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD TO POWER (FKA COLORADO SPRINGS FOOD RESCUE) — $30,000 · Food & NutritionSALISBURY SCHOOL INC — $133,000 · EducationRIVERSIDE EDUCATIONAL CENTER — $37,500 · EducationPARTNERS IN ROUTT COUNTY — $36,000 · EducationYOUTHENTITY — $36,000 · EducationHBA FOUNDATION DBA HOME BUILDERS FOUNDATION — $35,000 · EducationNorthwest Colorado Center for Independence Inc — $33,000 · EducationBOOK TRAILS INC — $32,000 · EducationEnglish in Action — $32,000 · EducationTINY TIM CENTER INC DBA TLC LEARNING CENTER — $31,000 · EducationEMILY GRIFFITH FOUNDATION — $30,000 · EducationDENVER KIDS INC — $30,000 · EducationHAVERN CENTER INC — $30,000 · EducationCANON LITERACY CENTER INC — $29,500 · EducationPOSADA — $55,000 · Housing & ShelterBROTHERS REDEVELOPMENT INC — $47,500 · Housing & ShelterSAN LUIS VALLEY HOUSING COALITION INC — $42,500 · Housing & ShelterCHAFFEE HOUSING TRUST — $40,000 · Housing & ShelterRising Up — $38,500 · Housing & ShelterHOPE COMMUNITIES INC — $36,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE DELORES PROJECT — $34,500 · Housing & ShelterTHE BRIDGE EMERGENCY SHELTER — $33,500 · Housing & ShelterTHE INN BETWEEN OF LONGMONT INC — $32,500 · Housing & ShelterCOLORADO HOMELESS FAMILIES INC — $32,000 · Housing & ShelterHomeward Pikes Peak — $31,500 · Housing & ShelterARCHWAY HOUSING & SERVICES — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterENERGY RESOURCE CENTER — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterPartners in Housing Inc — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE SAN LUIS VALLEY INC — $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS — $40,285 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LA PLATA COUNTY INC — $38,500 · Youth DevelopmentBoys and Girls Club of South Park — $37,000 · Youth DevelopmentTEENS INC — $33,000 · Youth DevelopmentelevateHER — $31,337 · Youth DevelopmentFOUR CORNERS CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER INC — $31,000 · Youth DevelopmentBLACK CANYON BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC — $31,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHAFFEE COUNTY — $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST COLO — $28,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FREMONT COUNTY INC — $28,500 · Youth DevelopmentCASA OF PUEBLO INC — $55,000 · Crime & LegalSAN LUIS VALLEY IMMIGRANT RESOURCE — $40,000 · Crime & LegalCHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM — $40,000 · Crime & LegalPORCHLIGHT A FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER — $34,000 · Crime & LegalTHE CRAWFORD CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER — $33,000 · Crime & LegalPROJECT SAFEGUARD — $32,000 · Crime & LegalCHILDSAFE COLORADO INC — $32,000 · Crime & LegalFAMILY VISITOR PROGRAM OF GARFIELD COUNTY INC — $31,000 · Crime & LegalTHE CONFLICT CENTER — $30,000 · Crime & Legal
Human Services$2,053,407Other$2,960,392Food & Nutrition$527,220Education$525,000Housing & Shelter$513,500Youth Development$419,122Crime & Legal$327,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSALISBURY SCHOOL INC — $133,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $115,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLA PUENTE HOME INC — $110,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE SAN LUIS VALLEY INC — $90,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCASA OF PUEBLO INC — $55,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetPOSADA — $55,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetPARARESCUE FOUNDATION — $53,500 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION — $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Pueblo County — $49,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetADAMS COUNTY EMERGENCY FOOD BANK — $48,500 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetPueblo Cooperative Care Center — $48,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBROTHERS REDEVELOPMENT INC — $47,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMANNA - THE DURANGO SOUP KITCHEN — $45,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetWARREN VILLAGE INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWELD FOOD BANK — $43,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAN LUIS VALLEY HOUSING COALITION INC — $42,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN ROOTS FOOD PROJECT — $42,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetHOMEWARD ALLIANCE INC — $42,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS — $40,285 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMariposa Center for Safety — $40,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetAlternative Horizons Corporation — $40,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetSAN LUIS VALLEY IMMIGRANT RESOURCE — $40,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetSAN LUIS VALLEY LOCAL FOODS COALITION — $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetDenver Inner City Parish Inc — $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetFOCUS POINTS FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER — $40,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCommunity Coalition for Families and Children — $40,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCROSSROADS SAFEHOUSE INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCHILD AND FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAM — $40,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTEACHING TREE EARLY CHILDHOOD LEARNING CENTER — $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSparkHope Automotive — $40,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetWEDONTWASTE INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER URBAN GARDENS — $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCHAFFEE HOUSING TRUST — $40,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetFULL CIRCLE OF LAKE COUNTY INC — $40,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetSAFEHOUSE DENVER INC — $40,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES - DENVER CASA — $40,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC — $39,750 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSUN VALLEY YOUTH CENTER INC — $38,500 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetA Sanctuary for Military Families Inc DBA Project Sanctuary — $38,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetRising Up — $38,500 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetA WOMAN'S PLACE INCORPORATED — $38,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetALIGHT ALLIANCE TO LEAD IMPACT IN GLOBAL — $38,500 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LA PLATA COUNTY INC — $38,500 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetRIVERSIDE EDUCATIONAL CENTER — $37,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSt Anne's Episcopal School Inc — $37,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTeller Senior Coalition Inc — $37,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetDELTA MONTROSE YOUTH SERVICES INC — $37,500 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetSIX POINTS EVALUATION AND TRAINING INC — $37,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Av Hunter Trust Incor…El Pomar FoundationThe Colorado Health F…Colorado Gives Founda…Trailhead InstituteCaring for Colorado F…The Colorado TrustRocky Mountain Health…Temple Hoyne Buell Fo…The Edmund T & Eleano…Gates Family Foundati…Nextfifty Initiative
Av Hunter Trust IncorporatedCO234.7× affinity132 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Av Hunter Trust Incorporated · El Pomar Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Trailhead Institute · Caring for Colorado Foundation · The Colorado Trust · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · The Edmund T & Eleanor Quick Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Nextfifty Initiative

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Anschutz Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    145report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Anschutz Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Anschutz Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 731 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home