· Private foundation
Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1102 grants · $1.3M
- $10k–50k86 grants · $1.5M
- $50k–250k10 grants · $892k
- $250k+1 grant · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC | $500,000 |
| SUPPORT FOR CATHOLIC SCHOOLS INC | $197,969 |
| AGAPE TINH-THUONG FOR VIETNAM | $146,143 |
| CROSSROADS RHODE ISLAND | $120,000 |
| WICHITA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $90,000 |
| KINH 5 FOUNDATION | $74,200 |
| THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY | $60,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUNTY | $53,908 |
| KANSAS AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM | $50,000 |
| UNITED WAY SOUTHEASTERN NEW ENGLAND | $50,000 |
| ATLANTIC COUNCIL FOR THE U S | $50,000 |
| NATIONAL MERIT SCHOLARSHIP CORPORATION | $47,625 |
| UNION RESCUE MISSION OF WICHITA INC | $31,130 |
| COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED | $31,079 |
| EMBRACE OF WICHITA INC | $30,118 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
1232 repeat relationships — 767 still active in FY2024, 465 since wound down; 176 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $441k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UWUNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC5× · 2020–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +17%
- WHWICHITA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC5× · 2020–2024 · $442k · revenue +95%
CROSSROADS RHODE ISLAND5× · 2020–2024 · $429k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- NCNATIONAL CRYPTOLOGIC MUSEUMone grant, 2020 · $200k
- STST THOMAS AQUINAS CATHOLIC SCHOOL INCone grant, 2020 · $51k
- MCMAGDALEN CATHOLIC SCHOOLone grant, 2020 · $41k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Uniting communities to alleviate hunger.
A people-centered approach to the conservation of gorillas and their habitats in Africa
Allosource responsibly processes and distributes human donated tissue that enhances and saves lives.
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
Advancing the science of water to improve the quality of life.
To advance professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power.
Witness helps people use video and technology to protect and defend human rights. the organization operates globally. witness' global team designs solutions, provides guidance, and co-develops strategies that enable human rights defenders…
Furman university is an institution of higher education providing distinctive undergraduate education emphasizing an engaged approach combining classroom learning with real world experiences and self-discovery.
To advance the rights and opportunities of children and youth worldwide.
Offer a challenging education that develops the qualities of mind, spirit and body for students.
Advancing health through research, education, clinical practice, and community partnerships; providing each person the best care in the right place, at the right time, every time.
Pathfinder builds lasting and trusted local partnerships to strengthen health systems, forging resilient pathways to sexual and reproductive health and rights for all.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Servants Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Love Pit. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1579 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1579 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC ↗
- Who funds WICHITA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS RHODE ISLAND ↗
- Who funds SEDGWICK COUNTY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Support for Catholic Schools Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds National Merit Scholarship Corporation ↗
- Who funds WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
- Who funds KINH 5 FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PROVIDENCE ↗
- Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS RHODE ISLAND INC ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds EMBRACE OF WICHITA INC ↗
- Who funds WATERFIRE PROVIDENCE ↗
- Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR STRATEGIC AND BUDGETARY ASSESSMENTS ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES FOUNDATION FOR THE COMMEMORATION OF WORLD WARS ↗
- Who funds THE GENESIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR OKLAHOMA CITY CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds KANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds CLINICA ESPERANZA HOPE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds AIR & SPACE FORCES AID SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF KANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED METHODIST OPEN DOOR ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Berry Foundation Inc · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Wichita Foundation · Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable Trust · Bruce G Cochener Foundation · The Fidelity Bank Foundation · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · United Way of the Plains Inc · Sid W Richardson Foundation · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · Amon G Carter Foundation · Belin Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Center for Women & Enterprise Inc — 27% of income from government
- Force-Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered Inc — 15% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Loyola University Maryland Inc — 6% of income from government
- Norwich University — 4% of income from government
- Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc — 3% of income from government
- Entrepreneurship for All Inc — 2% of income from government
- United Way Suncoast Inc — 1% of income from government
- Heart of Florida United Way Inc — 0% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353?
Find your warmest path to Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.