· Private foundation
The Fidelity Bank Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $54k
- $10k–50k14 grants · $326k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $680k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Wichita Habitat for Humanity | $100,000 |
| HopeNet | $100,000 |
| Hunter Health Clinic Inc | $100,000 |
| EmberHope Youthville | $100,000 |
| American Red Cross | $70,000 |
| Wichita Family Crisis Center | $60,000 |
| KU Endowment | $50,000 |
| Orpheum Performing Arts Center Ltd | $50,000 |
| Sedgwick County Zoo | $50,000 |
| KPTS | $40,000 |
| United Way of the Plains | $40,000 |
| United Way of the Plains | $40,000 |
| Mulberry Arts Inc | $30,000 |
| Wichita Habitat for Humanity | $30,000 |
| Starkey Inc | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $569k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
32 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $408k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UWUNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC5× · 2021–2025 · $215k · revenue +8%
- HHHUNTER HEALTH CLINIC2× · 2021–2025 · $113k · revenue +52%
- HIHOPENET INC2× · 2024–2025 · $110k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- YAYMCA AT WSU INNOVATION CAMPUSone grant, 2021 · $25k
- HSHOLY SAVIORone grant, 2021 · $25k
- TYTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WICHITA KANSAS (2311)one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wichita indochinese center inc's mission is to teach english, employability skills, and life skills to any adult whose first language is not english and to help find jobs for those seeking work.
Engage community partners (including local governments, nonprofit organizations, and public institutions) to develop a community vision to address education, quality of life, infrastructure, workforce, and economic development and…
Wichita's littlest heroes (wlh) exists to provide hope, help, and happiness to families of children ages 0-18 in the kansas area who are battling life-threatening medical conditions. wlh strives to accomplish this be being a physical and…
To provide christ-centered programs and services that lead the homeless toward self-sufficiency.
To drive economic growth and community advancement in the wichita region.
The mission of Downtown Wichita is to cultivate opportunities that revitalize and enhance Wichita's urban core.
To improve the quality of life for residents of wichita county, ks through community and economic development activities.
To empower families with children to overcome homelessness and housing insecurity through a holistic approach, community involvement, and sustainable solutions.
Enriching western Kansas life through philanthropy, collaboration and leadership.
The kansas children's discovery center enhances the lives of children and enriches the communities it serves.
To engage in grant making to medical educational organizations and related charitable activities in the area of eye disease and vision disorder, and the care and treatment thereof.
Inspire and educate the community to engage in preservation through the kell house heritage center.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wichita Foundation and the most unlike its peers is La Familia Senior Community Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WICHITA FAMILY CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE ↗
- Who funds WICHITA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds HUNTER HEALTH CLINIC ↗
- Who funds HOPENET INC ↗
- Who funds EMBERHOPE INC ↗
- Who funds PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds EXPLORATION PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds ENVISION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ORPHEUM PERFORMING ARTS CENTRE LTD ↗
- Who funds EMPOWER EVERGREEN INC ↗
- Who funds WICHITA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MULBERRY ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN FIRST CEO KANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds WICHITA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds STARKEY INC ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WICHITA KANSAS (2311) ↗
- Who funds BOTANICA INC ↗
- Who funds WICHITA TOP CHILDRENS FUND ↗
- Who funds STARKEY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Guadalupe Clinic Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTER CITY ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds Wichita Art Museum Inc ↗
- Who funds KANSAS HISPANIC EDUCATION & DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Bike Walk Wichita Inc ↗
- Who funds WICHITA AREA SEXUAL ASSAULT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LEGACY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds EPISCOPAL SOCIAL SERVICES INC DBA BREAKTHROUGH ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF KANSAS HEARTLAND INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS AVIATION MUSEUM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wichita Foundation · United Way of the Plains Inc · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Berry Foundation Inc · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Lattner Family Foundation Inc · Belin Foundation · Kansas Health Foundation · Goebel Family-Star Lumber Charitable Trust · Ima Foundation · K T Wiedemann Foundation Inc · Daniel J Taylor Family Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Fidelity Bank Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.