Skip to content

Texas · Nonprofit

6 STONES MISSION NETWORK

6 STONES MISSION NETWORK (Texas) receives grants from 48 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,901,140 to it, the largest being JE AND LE MABEE FOUNDATION INC ($2,000,000). 28 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$4.8M
Funders on record
48
Grants received
$4.9M
Net assets
$8.6M
28/48 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 15%
01What it does

What 6 Stones Mission Network does

Mission

To meet the needs of the less fortunate in the fort worth dallas metroplex in the following areas: food and clothing, housing, school supplies, and providing community service to lower income families in apartment communities.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Community powered revitalization- this program provides home renovations in hurst, bedford, euless, and grapevine, texas and surrounding communities for the underprivileged, disabled, and elderly individuals. Home renovations: 4 cities, 43 homes served, 916 unique homes since 2009, 8,653 volunteer hours in 2025

    $669,255 spent$63,786 earned by the program
    16% of program spending
  2. Compassion ministries- this program provides emergency assistance of food, clothing, and other resources to families in need. New hope center food pantry: 4,686 volunteers, 13,084 families served, 42,624 individuals served in 2025

    $2,917,203 spent$278,033 earned by the program
    70% of program spending
  3. School based initiatives- this program provides economically disadvantaged students with backpacks and school supplies. This program also provides gifts and christmas dinners to families in need. Night of hope christmas events: 2,409 volunteers, 19 church partners, 3,057 children served, 7,272 volunteer hours in 2025

    $583,059 spent$118,264 earned by the program
    14% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $4,169,517.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2019, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2019, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20192019 Revenue 100 ($2.4M) Expenses 100 ($2.0M) Net assets 100 ($783k)2020 Revenue 125 ($3.0M) Expenses 127 ($2.5M) Net assets 160 ($1.3M)2021 Revenue 145 ($3.4M) Expenses 128 ($2.5M) Net assets 280 ($2.2M)2022 Revenue 178 ($4.2M) Expenses 127 ($2.5M) Net assets 500 ($3.9M)2023 Revenue 236 ($5.6M) Expenses 141 ($2.7M) Net assets 860 ($6.7M)2024 Revenue 158 ($3.7M) Expenses 161 ($3.1M) Net assets 1095 ($8.6M)2025 Revenue 202 ($4.8M) Expenses 246 ($4.8M) Net assets 1093 ($8.6M)
2019202020212022202320242025
Revenue (202)Expenses (246)Net assets (1093)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $4.1M to $9.2M (+124%).

$857k
$1.4M
$2.3M
$4.1M
$9.2M
$9.7M
$9.7M
2019202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2019 8% · 2020 16% · 2021 8% · 2022 7% · 2023 43% · 2024 23% · 2025 46%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

89% of 6 STONES MISSION NETWORK’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (81% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 11,793 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 7 reported years ran a deficit.

$406k
’19
$471k
’20
$921k
’21
$1.7M
’22
$2.8M
’23
$584k
’24
−$19k
’25
3.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

2019202020212022202320242025
Listed20191924191921
Joined·+10+1+8+2+5+4
No longer listed·1113752
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 7 funders to 26 funders, grant income rose $54k → $426k.

16 of 48 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 23% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of 6 STONES MISSION NETWORK’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 48 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

6 STONES MISSION NETWORK leans on a few funders — its largest provides 41% of grant income and the top three 58%; half comes from just 3 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

28% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund 6 STONES MISSION NETWORK.

41%
largest funder
58%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 46% · 2018 47% · 2019 48% · 2020 33% · 2021 30% · 2022 18% · 2023 27% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

65% of 6 STONES MISSION NETWORK's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 58% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

69% of 6 STONES MISSION NETWORK's grant income comes from Texas funders.

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
RI
MO
AZ
TN
NC
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Texas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.2M arriving through sponsors registered in 13 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

6 STONES MISSION NETWORK is better cushioned than half of the 6,891 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−0% · below the median
Months of reserve3.4mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)12% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,891 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Organizations like 6 STONES MISSION NETWORK

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

87% of spending goes to programs.

Program 87%Management 9%Fundraising 4%

Governance

17
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for 6 STONES MISSION NETWORK: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds 6 STONES MISSION NETWORK?
6 STONES MISSION NETWORK (Texas) receives grants from 48 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,901,140 to it, the largest being JE AND LE MABEE FOUNDATION INC ($2,000,000). 28 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does 6 STONES MISSION NETWORK have?
IRS filings report 48 organizations giving $4,901,140 in grants to 6 STONES MISSION NETWORK, 28 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of 6 STONES MISSION NETWORK?
JE AND LE MABEE FOUNDATION INC is the largest funder on record, with $2,000,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like 6 STONES MISSION NETWORK find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds 6 Stones Mission Network →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2019–2025), and the filings of 48 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing