How much did COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS (TAX grant in FY2024?

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS (TAX reported 742 grants totaling $45,388,649 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS (TAX based?

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS (TAX is based in TX.

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS (TAX

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Community foundation

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS (TAX

To strengthen the community through civic leadership and to encourage philanthropy by providing community knowledge and reliable stewardship to those who wish to fulfill their charitable goals in a meaningful way--either during or beyond their lifetimes.

$45M

Granted FY2024

742

Grants

Communities

$1.5M

Largest

01What you fund

0174% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$45MHealth$20MHuman Services$17MPhilanthropy$14MYouth Development$12MArts & Culture$8.0MAnimals$8.0MHousing & Shelter$6.4MReligion$3.6MOther$69M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

memory parentsparents marymary ryanryan johnjohn wilsonanonymoustracy jackson

2019

happy ableask pleaseplease removeremove mailingmailing listlist thankrequest donor

2020

covid relieftoolbox awardcovid pandemicpresenting worthworth deliberationstaff recommendedrecommended holiday

2021

winter stormimmediate sufferingsuffering extraordinaryextraordinary duecovid februaryfebruary winterstorm crises

2022

tower healthmethodist fortpledge paymentdarden philiprecovery impactimpact covidtoolbox board

2023

toolbox consultantmauimcfadden distributionrelief countryboarding trainingabandoned pupssearcy

2024

attachmentstrategy consultingtohelpbehavorialvolunteer charitabilecharitabile dedicateddedicated rescuing

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 742 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k128 grants · $935k
$10k–50k476 grants · $8.4M
$50k–250k106 grants · $11M
$250k+32 grants · $17M

$15,000

Median grant

States reached

$545M

Total assets

Largest grants

SAVING HOPE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND$1,500,000
TEXAS HEALTH RESOURCES FOUNDATION$1,050,000
CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF SMITH COUNTY$1,000,000
MENTORING ALLIANCE$1,000,000
MOSAIC COUNSELING CENTERS OF EAST TEXAS INC$1,000,000
CHURCHOME$1,000,000
EAST TEXAS VETERANS COMMUNITY COUNCIL$1,000,000
TEXAS WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY - ADVANCEMENT OFFICE$988,800
NEW LEAF COMMUNITY SERVICES$950,000
LIFE OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHURCHES INC$580,000
NATIONAL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC$540,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS FOUNDATION$515,812
ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF FORT WORTH$500,000
CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING LIVES$500,000
FORT WORTH INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT$450,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $10.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$181M · 1033 repeat orgs$23M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

1033 repeat relationships — 364 still active in FY2024, 669 since wound down; 104 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1033

863

Total granted

$181M

$14M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%

+39%

Still filing today

79%

71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8.3M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TT
TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $11M · revenue +27%
IP
IDEA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
4× · 2018–2021 · $3.6M · revenue +137%
ABILENE CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
5× · 2017–2024 · $3.5M · revenue +72%

Funded once

GP
GRAHAM PUBLIC ED FOUNDgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $2.6M · revenue +115% · 93% of their budget
AC
AUSTIN COLLEGE
one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +1%
FW
FORT WORTH NOWgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $370k · revenue +178% · 82% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

North Texas Christian Foundation

As the North Texas affiliate of the National Christian Foundation (NCF), our mission is to serve and encourage givers to grow as faithful stewards who give wisely to further the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

Philanthropy

Aclu Foundation of Texas Inc

To be Texas' foremost champion of individual rights & freedoms through education & litigation.

Civil Rights

Texas a&M Research Foundation

To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.

Education

Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

To advocate the interest and enhance the viability of hospitals in dallas, fort worth, and north texas and to strengthen the relationship of hospitals to the communities they serve

—

Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education

Texans Care for Children Inc

Texas Care for Children shapes public policies and brings Texans together to make children a statewide priority. We work so kids can have what they need to be healthy, secure, and thriving and so every Texan can have the best start to life.

Crime & Legal

Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights

Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services

University of Dallas

The university of dallas is dedicated to the pursuit of wisdom, of truth, and of virtue as the proper and primary ends of education. the university seeks to educate its students so they may develop the intellectual and moral virtues,…

Education

Valor Texas Education Foundation

Valor Public Schools educates the whole person in authentic communities for a full human life.

Education

Texas Health Physicians Group

A FAITH-BASED ORGANIZATION WHOSE MISSION IS TO IMPROVE THE HEALTH OF the people in the communities it serves, regarless of thier ability to pay.

Health

Texas Business Hall of Fame Foundation

Annually, the Texas Business Hall of Fame inducts six transformational business leaders and funds an awards program for up to 40 entrepreneurial students in the higher education space, veteran company, high school business education space…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Transforming Lives and the most unlike its peers is National Gallery of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%33/1,979

the rest of the field

13%

17,150/134,825

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

1573 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

508

Early backer (in before they grew)

1503/1573

Grantees still filing

1147/1573

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$86,968,193Education$45,467,283Health$19,714,829Human Services$17,106,422Philanthropy$14,098,761Youth Development$12,205,952Arts & Culture$8,044,298

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan FoTX166.3× affinity133 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo · United Way of Tarrant County · The Morris Foundation · Rainwater Charitable Foundation · Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation · The Junior League of Fort Worth Inc · Ann L Rhodes and Carol Greene Rhodes · Helen Irwin Littauer Educational Trust · The Roach Foundation Inc · The Rees-Jones Foundation · Garvey Texas Foundation Inc · Leo Potishman Foundation Xxxxx3002

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS (TAX funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: TAPESTRY MINISTRIES INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.9× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 270643027 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on TAPESTRY MINISTRIES INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 97% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax?

Find your warmest path to Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

More from the funding graph

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

Strange bedfellows

the named clusters of US funding

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home

State money flows

the interactive map of money crossing state lines