Skip to content

Texas · Nonprofit

OPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTH

OPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTH (Texas) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $735,000 to it, the largest being DOUBLE EAGLE CHARITIES INC ($410,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$92k
Funders on record
6
Grants received
$735k
Net assets
$331k
1/6 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year
01What it does

What Operation Progress Fort Worth does

Mission

Operation Progress Fort Worth empowers underserved youth to become educated, ethical and productive adults who reach their full potential and positively contribute to society. To do this, we are committed to supporting participating scholars from elementary school through college with our comprehensive program called the five pillars of success.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Scholarship and academic support: Operation Progress Fort Worth (opfw) provided individualized academic case management to each scholar. Academic programming focused on transforming scholars into knowledgeable and critical thinkers, allows them to develop and perfect effective study strategies, requires them to minimally achieve a 3.0 gpa, and aims to shift the scholars' mindset to make academics a key priority. Additionally, opfw provides scholarship assistance for such scholars.

    $60,413 spentof which $25,057 as grants
    42% of program spending
  2. Comprehensive expanded learning: our programs are rooted in our five pillars of success. The five pillars of success are academics, life skills, health and wellness, service and safety, and support. The goal of the five pillars of success is for the scholars to build character, social competency, leadership skills, and emotional intelligence. The expanded learning programs provided fundamental educational opportunities that scholars otherwise would not have and will include arts, music, coping skills and fitness.

    $66,011 spent
    46% of program spending
  3. Mentorship: fort worth police officers serve as mentors and engage with scholars at least one time per month. Additionally, officers participated in mentor training one time per month. Such mentoring aided in providing support and safety, and built trust in the police-community relationship. The supportive relationship of mentors, parents, staff, and other caring adults are essential in the biopsychosocial growth of youth; mentoring provides a formal, structured caring relationship.

    $16,242 spent
    11% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $142,666.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($225k) Expenses 100 ($4k) Net assets 100 ($221k)2021 Revenue 18 ($39k) Expenses 3844 ($141k) Net assets 54 ($120k)2022 Revenue 28 ($63k) Expenses 4219 ($155k) Net assets 12 ($27k)2023 Revenue 110 ($246k) Expenses 4929 ($181k) Net assets 42 ($92k)2024 Revenue 239 ($537k) Expenses 4591 ($169k) Net assets 208 ($461k)2025 Revenue 41 ($92k) Expenses 6033 ($222k) Net assets 149 ($331k)
202020212022202320242025
Revenue (41)Expenses (6033)Net assets (149)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $92k to $465k (+404%).

$221k
$120k
$27k
$92k
$465k
$335k
202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2023 0% · 2024 11% · 2025 86%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

90% of OPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTH’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (99% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 6,261 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$221k
’20
−$102k
’21
−$92k
’22
$65k
’23
$368k
’24
−$130k
’25
17
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Myeshia Smith

Executive director

Board chair

Dr Johnny Nhan

Board president

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

202020212022202320242025
Listed666586
Joined·+3+1+0+4+1
No longer listed·31113
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2022: the base narrowed from 3 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $175k → $50k.

1 of 6 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 10% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of OPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTH’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

OPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTH leans on a few funders — its largest provides 56% of grant income and the top three 83%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

66% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund OPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTH.

56%
largest funder
83%
top three
~3
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 43% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

92% of OPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTH's grant income comes from Texas funders.

TN
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’20
’21
’22
Texas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $75k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

OPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTH is better cushioned than half of the 3,200 youth development nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−142% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve16.7mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−16% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,200 youth development nonprofits under $100k, FY2025

Organizations like OPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTH

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

64% of spending goes to programs.

Program 64%Management 20%Fundraising 16%

Governance

6
board members
83%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

71%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for OPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTH: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds OPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTH?
OPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTH (Texas) receives grants from 6 organizations whose IRS filings report $735,000 to it, the largest being DOUBLE EAGLE CHARITIES INC ($410,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does OPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTH have?
IRS filings report 6 organizations giving $735,000 in grants to OPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTH, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of OPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTH?
DOUBLE EAGLE CHARITIES INC is the largest funder on record, with $410,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like OPERATION PROGRESS FORT WORTH find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 6 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing