Skip to content
Plinth
← FundingAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Texas · Nonprofit

CIVIC DEVELOPMENT INC

CIVIC DEVELOPMENT INC (Texas) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $18,600 to it, the largest being COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS INC ($13,100). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 70% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

$147k
Revenue FY2022
3
Funders on record
$19k
Grants received
$0
Net assets
1/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 5%

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($72k) Expenses 100 ($303k) Net assets 100 ($5.1M)2018 Revenue 271 ($194k) Expenses 114 ($346k) Net assets 95 ($4.9M)2019 Revenue 154 ($111k) Expenses 126 ($381k) Net assets 93 ($4.8M)2020 Revenue 176 ($126k) Expenses 129 ($390k) Net assets 87 ($4.5M)2021 Revenue 194 ($139k) Expenses 129 ($392k) Net assets 83 ($4.3M)2022 Revenue 206 ($147k) Expenses 54 ($162k) Net assets 0 ($0)
201720182019202020212022
Revenue (206)Expenses (54)Net assets (0)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$231k
17
$152k
18
$271k
19
$264k
20
$253k
21
$15k
22
0.7
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2020: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $11k → $5k.

1 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF)70% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of CIVIC DEVELOPMENT INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CIVIC DEVELOPMENT INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 70% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

70% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CIVIC DEVELOPMENT INC.

70%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 53% · 2019 83% · 2020 100%growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

70% of CIVIC DEVELOPMENT INC's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $6k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Texas funders.

TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

18
19
Texas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $13k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 stateis excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 3 funders put you under-funded among the 184 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like CIVIC DEVELOPMENT INC

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

93% of spending goes to programs.

Program 93%Management 7%Fundraising 0%

Governance

12
board members
100%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CIVIC DEVELOPMENT INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CIVIC DEVELOPMENT INC?
CIVIC DEVELOPMENT INC (Texas) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $18,600 to it, the largest being COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS INC ($13,100). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 70% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does CIVIC DEVELOPMENT INC have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $18,600 in grants to CIVIC DEVELOPMENT INC, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CIVIC DEVELOPMENT INC?
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS INC is the largest funder on record, with $13,100 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CIVIC DEVELOPMENT INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2022 (financials across 2017–2022), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing