· Public charity
Tiaa Charitable Inc
Tiaa charitable is formed to encourage philanthropy and charitable giving by receiving gifts of money or property, investing and reinvesting the same, providing support and assistance to encourage the making of charitable contributions, and applying the income and principal thereof through contributions to the organizations or directly…
Read this first · the figures below need context
70% of Tiaa Charitable Inc’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 300 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Tiaa Charitable Inc named its own grantees at scale: 1043 organizations, $35M. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 1,091 grants below total $35,044,434 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $50,549,920 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $15,505,486 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2020
- Under $10k398 grants · $2.7M
- $10k–50k594 grants · $11M
- $50k–250k82 grants · $7.3M
- $250k+17 grants · $14M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| American Endowment Foundation FBO Bert Fish Founda | $2,945,727 |
| BNY Mellon Charitable Gift Fund | $2,387,016 |
| Brown University | $1,399,050 |
| The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Cente | $1,200,000 |
| Penn State University | $930,602 |
| Renaissance Charitable Foundation | $840,396 |
| Chance Academy | $685,000 |
| Friends of the Institute for Advanced Study | $603,500 |
| The U C Davis Foundation | $526,800 |
| University of Wisconsin Foundation | $516,860 |
| Third Avenue Playhouse Inc | $400,000 |
| Protestant Episcopal Cathedral Foundation of DC | $362,450 |
| Doctors with Borders | $356,135 |
| Cambridge in America | $340,000 |
| Harvard Art Museums | $299,835 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–20, $791k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.
726 repeat relationships — 608 still active in FY2020, 118 since wound down; 515 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACHANCE ACADEMY3× · 2018–2020 · $2.2M · revenue +66% · 100% of their budget
- FAFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC2× · 2020–2021 · $1.8M · revenue +56%
INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY - LOUIS BAMBERGER & MRS FELIX FULD FOUNDATION3× · 2019–2021 · $1.2M · revenue +98%
Funded once
- WRWILL ROGERS HIGH SCHOOL COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONone grant, 2019 · $500k · revenue -76% · 60% of their budget
- TBTEMPLE BETH OR PRESCHOOLone grant, 2019 · $276k
- UBUNITED BOARD FOR CHRISTIAN HIGHER EDUCATION IN ASIAgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $200k · revenue +420%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of America and the most unlike its peers is Paul S Veneklasen Research Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1213 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1213 of the 1,674 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BANK OF AMERICA CHARITABLE GIFT FD ↗
- Who funds UT SOUTHWESTERN HEALTH SYSTEMS ↗
- Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BNY MELLON CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds CHANCE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds RAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED STUDY - LOUIS BAMBERGER & MRS FELIX FULD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds Illinois Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Greater Kansas City Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds CAMBRIDGE IN AMERICA ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds THE UC DAVIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WILL ROGERS HIGH SCHOOL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds THIRD AVENUE PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds THE GRADUATE CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL AVIARY IN PITTSBURGH INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds A JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ernst & Young Foundation · Kpmg US Foundation Inc · Deloitte Foundation · Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc · Altman Foundation · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Arlington Community Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Ibm International Foundation · Rochester Area Community Foundation Depository Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Douglas County Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tiaa Charitable Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hias Inc — 88% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation — 7% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- The Trustees of the Smith College — 1% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Wgbh Educational Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Amherst College Trustees — 0% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Rutgers University Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.