Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc

The t.

$145M
Granted FY2025still arriving
2,900
Grants FY2025still arriving
52
States reached
$4.6M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0176% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2025.

Education$117MPhilanthropy$35MHealth$30MArts & Culture$22MInternational$21MHuman Services$21MYouth Development$11MCommunity Improvement$10MEnvironment$10MOther$142M
02FY2025 · 2900 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2,900 grants below total $132,526,568 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $144,929,825 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $12,403,257 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k795 grants · $5.5M
  • $10k–50k1612 grants · $31M
  • $50k–250k417 grants · $38M
  • $250k+76 grants · $58M
$13,650
Median grant
52
States reached
$648M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$4,627,660
TABOR ACADEMY$3,250,000
MAYO CLINIC$3,014,450
INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK$2,500,000
AMALGAMATED CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC$2,086,889
TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$2,067,070
COLGATE UNIVERSITY$2,024,000
FIDELITY CHARITABLE$1,868,551
VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM$1,621,513
THE EVERYMAN THEATRE INC$1,575,016
DAFGIVING360$1,490,304
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$1,304,870
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF BALTIMORE$1,243,550
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA$1,119,814
THE BRYN MAWR SCHOOL$1,059,450
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $14.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LEADING FOR KIDS: $200k → 7%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANCER RESEARCH: $101k → 6%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF ONONDAGA COUNTY: $200k → 14%SULLIVANARC FOUNDATION: $91k → 16%YOU GOTTA BELIEVE THE OLDER CHILD ADOPTION & PERMANENCY MOVEMENT: $75k → 20%WHISPERING MEADOWS RANCH: $300k → 9%GUADALUPE CENTER: $100k → 10%SHOES FOR CHILDREN INC: $1.2M → 13%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF SOUTH BROWARD INC: $150k → 13%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $722k → 11%STEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $200k → 9%ELDER SERVICES OF CAPE COD: $120k → 8%NEADS INC: $752k → 11%YOU GOTTA BELIEVE THE OLDER CHILD ADOPTION & PERMANENCY MOVEMENT: $70k → 20%WHISPERING MEADOWS RANCH: $70k → 9%STEP BY STEP FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $150k → 9%NEW YORK CITY RELIEF INC: $100k → 10%ELDER SERVICES OF CAPE COD: $75k → 8%WHISPERING MEADOWS RANCH: $70k → 9%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $100k → 23%WHISPERING MEADOWS RANCH: $70k → 9%MEMORIAL ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES: $150k → 16%WHISPERING MEADOWS RANCH: $70k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF CENTRAL MARYLAND: $617k → 19%SULAM: $110k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $148k → 14%ARCHDIOCESAN YOUTH EMPLOYMENT SERVICES: $120k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $122k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $120k → 14%BRIDGE FUND OF NEW YORK INC: $73k → 17%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $274k → 14%FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC: $154k → 11%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC: $100k → 11%OAK CREST VILLAGE INC: $81k → 11%OAK CREST VILLAGE INC: $72k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF BALTIMORE: $1.2M → 11%TURNAROUND TUESDAY INC: $1.0M → 19%ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE INC: $137k → 19%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC: $185k → 19%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC: $184k → 19%29TH STREET COMMUNITY CENTER: $75k → 19%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC: $174k → 19%CENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC: $144k → 19%HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC: $65k → 19%BELOVED COMMUNITY SERVICES CORPORATION: $100k → 19%ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $1.2M → 19%ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $1.1M → 19%ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $1.0M → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$341M · 1655 repeat orgs$29M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

1655 repeat relationships — 1376 still active in FY2025, 279 since wound down; 111 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

1655
155

Total granted

$341M
$18M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
0%

Still filing today

70%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    TABOR ACADEMY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $9.8M · revenue +54%
  • IC
    INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK
    4× · 2022–2025 · $7.9M · revenue +14%
  • CU
    COLGATE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5.1M · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • SF
    Shoes For Children
    one grant, 2022 · $1.2M · revenue -10% · 33% of their budget
  • RC
    RIORDAN CLINIC INC
    one grant, 2024 · $1.0M · revenue 0%
  • DOOR COUNTY LAND TRUST INC
    one grant, 2024 · $942k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

Founded 131 years ago, the boston architectural college is a recognized institution providing excellence in practice-integrated design education to members of diverse communities with students representing 35 countries. the bac offers…

—
2
University of New Haven

See schedule ouniversity of new haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts & professional education.

Education
3
United States Naval Institute

To advance professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power.

—
4
University of Denver

A higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees.

Education
5
Augustana College

Offer a challenging education that develops the qualities of mind, spirit and body for students.

Education
6
Furman University

Furman university is an institution of higher education providing distinctive undergraduate education emphasizing an engaged approach combining classroom learning with real world experiences and self-discovery.

Education
7
Oklahoma City University

Oklahoma city university prepares all learners to create, lead and serve.

Education
8
Salus University

Advancing integrated health care through innovative education, research and clinical services

—
9
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Columbia College

Columbia college provides educational opportunities that develop students' capacity for critical thought and expression, life-long learning, acceptance of personal responsibilty, and commitment to service and social justice.

Education
11
Fielding Graduate University

Fielding provides doctoral, master's and graduate-level certificate programs in the fields of educational leadership, organization development, and psychology.

—
12
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Black Hills Area Community and the most unlike its peers is Goucher College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-12 SchoolsEnvironmental Conservation …Jewish Community Organizati…Policy Research and AdvocacyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Senior Support ServicesCancer Support ServicesElementary Literacy TutoringWomen & Girls Leadership De…Youth Development ServicesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Local Food System Organizat…School District FoundationsEquine Therapy ProgramsAffordable Housing Developm…Dance Arts OrganizationsDevelopmental Disabilities …Lgbtq+ Community SupportImmigrant Worker SupportUnited Way AffiliatesYmca Youth DevelopmentSchool Parent OrganizationsPublic Library OperationsYouth Mentoring ProgramsFaith-Based Social ServicesLocal History MuseumsCommunity Food PantriesAddiction Recovery ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Domestic Violence ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsMilitary Veterans SupportChristian Youth CampsFood Banks and PantriesCommunity FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…Animal Rescue and ShelterHealth Access Advocacy and …Community Arts CentersCommunity College Foundatio…Youth Development CentersOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%39%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.4%21/5,423
the rest of the field
11%
206,143/1,814,142

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

1458 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1458 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

51
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
171
Early backer (in before they grew)
1436/1458
Grantees still filing
929/1458
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TABOR ACADEMY — $9,800,000 · EducationTABOR ACADEMYCOLGATE UNIVERSITY — $5,079,200 · EducationCOLGATE UNIVERSITYJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $4,849,975 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $3,555,557 · Education+68 more — $60,151,093 · Education+68 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $5,007,937 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICAFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $6,231,391 · OtherFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIF…THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN — $3,557,986 · Other+67 more — $58,006,916 · Other+67 moreNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $4,908,601 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHI…DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $3,632,169 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISE…THE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC — $3,625,810 · PhilanthropyTHE UNITED W…NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC — $3,175,890 · PhilanthropyNATL CHRISTI…Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc — $2,109,889 · PhilanthropyAmalgamated …VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $2,063,775 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHA…MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC — $1,472,884 · PhilanthropyMORGAN STANL…CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $1,034,344 · Philanthropy+8 more — $3,898,228 · Philanthropy+8 moreINFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK — $7,872,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC — $3,243,550 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $977,096 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $907,350 · HealthGREATER BALTIMORE MEDICAL CENTER INC — $863,750 · HealthTHE RACE INC — $825,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $801,923 · Health+3 more — $1,413,056 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $3,051,965 · InternationalMYRIAD USA INC — $1,519,896 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $1,203,615 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $1,129,460 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $837,410 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC — $805,100 · InternationalAnglican Relief and Development Fund — $680,750 · InternationalCONVOY OF HOPE — $623,470 · InternationalOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US — $582,400 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $567,470 · InternationalRAINFOREST TRUST — $504,800 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $481,400 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC — $455,834 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $448,310 · International+1 more — $435,202 · InternationalASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $4,574,573 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,902,636 · Human ServicesShoes For Children — $1,239,995 · Human ServicesTurnaround Tuesday Inc — $1,000,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR URBAN FAMILIES INC — $786,780 · Human ServicesNEADS INC — $751,500 · Human ServicesWHISPERING MEADOWS RANCH INC — $580,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC — $511,275 · Human ServicesEVERYMAN THEATRE INC — $3,754,212 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LES ARTS FLORISSANTS INC — $2,593,000 · Arts & CultureWORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC — $1,370,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Battlefield Trust — $765,205 · Arts & CultureARTIS-NAPLES INC — $750,150 · Arts & CultureAmerican Museum of Natural History — $600,000 · Arts & CultureWALTERS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC — $522,500 · Arts & CultureBALTIMORE MUSEUM OF ART — $415,475 · Arts & CultureCENTER STAGE ASSOCIATES INC — $386,370 · Arts & Culture
Education$83,435,825Other$72,804,230Philanthropy$25,921,590Health$16,903,725International$13,327,082Human Services$11,346,759Arts & Culture$11,156,912

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTABOR ACADEMY — $9,800,000 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetINFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK — $7,872,000 over 4y, 19% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $6,231,391 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOLGATE UNIVERSITY — $5,079,200 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $5,007,937 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $4,908,601 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $4,849,975 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $4,574,573 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetEVERYMAN THEATRE INC — $3,754,212 over 5y, 34% of budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $3,632,169 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC — $3,625,810 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetTHE NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN — $3,557,986 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $3,555,557 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $3,243,550 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC — $3,175,890 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $3,051,965 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LES ARTS FLORISSANTS INC — $2,593,000 over 3y, 92% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College — $2,574,643 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNew York University — $2,445,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University — $2,264,425 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMaryland Institute — $2,120,750 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc — $2,109,889 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $2,063,775 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFIORELLO H LAGUARDIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $2,025,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetSouthern Methodist University — $1,969,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,902,636 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT COLLEGE — $1,764,225 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHELPING UP MISSION INC — $1,718,865 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC — $1,656,765 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetBALTIMORE SQUASHWISE INC — $1,619,810 over 4y, 12% of budgetLINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY — $1,600,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetAFRICAN PARKS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $1,568,800 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE — $1,530,651 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC — $1,519,896 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $1,513,877 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNorwich University — $1,475,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC — $1,472,884 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $1,468,001 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRYN MAWR SCHOOL FOR GIRLS OF BALTIMORE CITY INC — $1,439,586 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetTHE DOOR - A CENTER OF ALTERNATIVES INC — $1,400,475 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetWORLD MONUMENTS FUND INC — $1,370,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetTHE HILL SCHOOL — $1,368,550 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $1,338,049 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetShoes For Children — $1,239,995 over 1y, 33% of budgetTHE ALLEN-STEVENSON SCHOOL — $1,224,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetMILLBROOK SCHOOL — $1,205,500 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $1,203,615 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGILMAN SCHOOL INCORPORATED — $1,201,229 over 5y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TABOR ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds INFORMED CONSENT ACTION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds COLGATE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERYMAN THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF LES ARTS FLORISSANTS INC ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds Maryland Institute ↗
  • Who funds Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds FIORELLO H LAGUARDIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds HELPING UP MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BALTIMORE SQUASHWISE INC ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN INSTITUTE OF LAND POLICY ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN PARKS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Norwich University ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

France-Merrick Founda…The John J Leidy Foun…The Marion I & Henry …T Rowe Price Foundati…The Morris Goldseker …The Bunting Family Fo…Middendorf Foundation…Dr Frank C Marino Fou…The Abell Foundation …Lockhart Vaughan Foun…Clayton Baker TrustLinehan Family Founda…
France-Merrick Foundation IncMD75.7× affinity149 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The John J Leidy Foundation Inc · The Marion I & Henry J Knott Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Foundation · The Morris Goldseker Foundation of Maryland Inc · The Bunting Family Foundation · Middendorf Foundation Inc · Dr Frank C Marino Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · Lockhart Vaughan Foundation · Clayton Baker Trust · Linehan Family Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 220%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Center for Urban Families Inc — 36% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
  • African People & Wildlife Fund Inc — 32% of income from government
  • University of Delaware — 30% of income from government
  • Baltimore Squashwise Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Epilepsy Foundation of America — 22% of income from government
  • Baltimore Corps Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Everyman Theatre Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Thread Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
  • Associated Catholic Charities Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Living Classrooms Foundation — 7% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • Center Stage Associates Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Helping Up Mission Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Loyola University Maryland Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Rebuild Metro Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Baltimore Museum of Art — 4% of income from government
  • Norwich University — 4% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Melvin J Berman Hebrew Academy — 2% of income from government
  • The United Way of Central Maryland Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Whispering Meadows Ranch Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Youth Co-Op Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Neads Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
  • National Aquarium Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Goucher College — 0% of income from government
  • Connecticut College — 0% of income from government
  • Mcdaniel College Inc — 0% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Greater Baltimore Medical Center Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Mcdonogh School Incorporated — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
22get no government money at all
33report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc?

Find your warmest path to T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 2000 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines