Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Kpmg US Foundation Inc

We will grow together, for better through trusted collaborations to improve inclusion and greater opportunities in our communities.

$35M
Granted FY2025still arriving
387
Grants FY2025still arriving
46
States reached
$2.2M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$88MHealth$12MHuman Services$7.6MInternational$6.7MPhilanthropy$6.3MYouth Development$6.3MEmployment$5.0MCivil Rights$4.1MOther$0
02FY2025 · 387 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 387 grants below total $33,481,387 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $34,502,718 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,021,331 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k53 grants · $358k
  • $10k–50k205 grants · $4.4M
  • $50k–250k101 grants · $10M
  • $250k+28 grants · $18M
$25,000
Median grant
46
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA$2,212,100
FIRST BOOK$2,002,000
NATIONAL BOARD FOR PROFESSIONAL$1,350,000
GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC$1,029,186
FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC$750,000
YEAR UP INC$750,000
BEYOND HOUSING INC$700,000
NAMI NATIONAL$675,000
NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION$650,000
CHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC$600,000
WHITMAN WALKER FOUNDATION INC$600,000
MENTAL HEALTH LEADERSHIP$600,000
DC CAP (AI GRANT)$600,000
THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDR$555,000
COOP CAREERS INC$525,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $8.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE PACK SHACK: $91k → 8%EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION: $1.1M → 11%ELEVATION SCHOLARS: $450k → 13%THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDR: $555k → 11%OPERATION STAND DOWN TENNESSEE: $75k → 14%YOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION INC: $113k → 17%WARREN VILLAGE INC: $75k → 12%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $343k → 24%Oasis- A Haven for Women and Children: $32k → 12%CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF: $250k → 19%The Pack Shack: $35k → 6%MELWOOD HORTICULTRAL TRAINING CENTER: $300k → 11%EMERGING WORKFORCE INITIATIVE INC: $75k → 15%CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES: $50k → 14%HEALTH ALLIANCE FOR THE UNINSURED: $50k → 16%THE PACK SHACK: $40k → 8%EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION: $411k → 11%UNITED COMMUNITY CENTER: $75k → 17%WHAM NOW INC: $500k → 9%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $95k → 24%THE UP CENTER: $75k → 19%COMFORT CASES INC: $30k → 8%MELWOOD HORTICULTURAL TRAINING: $30k → 11%EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $351k → 11%THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $75k → 11%Mississippi State University Foundation: $89k → 24%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $150k → 10%EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION: $125k → 11%WHAMNOW INC: $50k → 9%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $64k → 24%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $53k → 10%NY POLICE AND FIRE WIDOWS AND: $100k → 17%Mississippi State University Foundation: $57k → 24%SERVING SENIORS: $50k → 11%BAKERRIPLEY: $150k → 16%YWCA Greenwich: $28k → 9%Mississippi State University Foundation: $55k → 24%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $32k → 24%WESLEY FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 11%WESTSIDE FUTURE FUND: $150k → 13%PROJECT HOME: $75k → 22%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $75k → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $75k → 17%THE AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $27k → 14%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $1.0M → 17%The Innocence Project: $75k → 17%Girls Who Code Inc: $135k → 17%GIRLS WHO CODE INC: $75k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$121M · 494 repeat orgs$20M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

494 repeat relationships — 293 still active in FY2025, 201 since wound down; 69 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

494
235

Total granted

$121M
$13M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+10%

Still filing today

85%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA
    5× · 2018–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +165%
  • EA
    EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $1.9M · revenue +10%
  • NN
    NAMI National
    5× · 2020–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +274%

Funded once

  • HS
    HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT
    one grant, 2024 · $1.0M · revenue -15%
  • PB
    PURPOSE BUILT COMMUNITIES FOUNDATIONINCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $750k · revenue +417%
  • CH
    CONTINUUM HEALTH PARTNERS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $525k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
4
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
5
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
6
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
8
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
9
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
10
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
11
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
12
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint Peter's University and the most unlike its peers is Urban Schools Human Capital Academy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Elementary Literacy TutoringYouth Development ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Military Veterans SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Addiction Recovery ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportIndependent K-12 SchoolsYouth Development CentersYouth Sports ProgramsJewish Community Organizati…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Affordable Housing Construc…Community Arts CentersSenior Support ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesCommunity FoundationsLocal Food System Organizat…Cancer Support ServicesFood Banks and PantriesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Policy Research and AdvocacyCommunity College Foundatio…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 55 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%51%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%39%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.2%2/826
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,818,739

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

710 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 710 of the 826 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
56
Early backer (in before they grew)
707/710
Grantees still filing
491/710
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIRST BOOK — $4,413,204 · EducationFIRST BOOKUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $2,097,722 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC — $1,882,086 · Education+98 more — $45,344,074 · Education+98 moreUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS — $2,029,141 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXASJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA — $2,989,500 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USANATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING FUND — $1,260,000 · Other+60 more — $24,938,654 · Other+60 moreNAMI National — $1,750,000 · HealthFOUNTAIN HOUSE INC — $1,050,000 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE INC — $700,000 · HealthWHITMAN-WALKER FOUNDATION INC — $680,000 · HealthActive Minds Inc — $675,000 · HealthNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $650,000 · HealthCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC — $600,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $552,675 · HealthCONTINUUM HEALTH PARTNERS INC — $525,000 · HealthAdventHealth Foundation Inc — $450,000 · HealthNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR BEHAVIORAL HEALTH — $450,000 · HealthTHE JED FOUNDATION — $450,000 · Health+1 more — $205,000 · HealthEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC — $1,945,657 · Human ServicesHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT — $1,000,000 · Human ServicesMississippi State University Foundation Inc — $744,087 · Human ServicesTHE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN — $630,000 · Human ServicesWHAMNOW INC — $550,000 · Human ServicesELEVATION SCHOLARS INC — $450,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS WHO CODE INC — $360,000 · Human ServicesMELWOOD HORTICULTURAL TRAINING CENTER INC — $330,000 · Human ServicesCHILD & FAMILY SERVICES OF EASTERN VA INC D/B/A THE UP CENTER — $325,000 · Human Services+2 more — $408,650 · Human ServicesGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $4,870,648 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $506,104 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF — $504,321 · InternationalPLAN INTERNATIONAL USA INC — $490,034 · InternationalCONVOY OF HOPE — $222,535 · InternationalBATTIER TAKE CHARGE FOUNDATION — $1,470,000 · PhilanthropyRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc — $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $910,000 · PhilanthropyPURPOSE BUILT COMMUNITIES FOUNDATIONINC — $750,000 · PhilanthropyPOINTS OF LIGHT FOUNDATION — $390,000 · PhilanthropySEATTLE FOUNDATION — $300,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PHD PROJECT ASSOCIATION — $4,035,000 · Civil Rights
Education$53,737,086Other$31,217,295Health$8,737,675Human Services$6,743,394International$6,593,642Philanthropy$4,820,000Civil Rights$4,035,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC — $4,870,648 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetFIRST BOOK — $4,413,204 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetTHE PHD PROJECT ASSOCIATION — $4,035,000 over 5y, 88% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA — $2,989,500 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac — $2,097,722 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC — $1,945,657 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC — $1,882,086 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetNAMI National — $1,750,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetNATIONAL BOARD FOR PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS — $1,725,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetNAF — $1,615,000 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetBATTIER TAKE CHARGE FOUNDATION — $1,470,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetYEAR UP INC — $1,420,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $1,314,237 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING FUND — $1,260,000 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetIndiana University Foundation — $1,052,454 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNTAIN HOUSE INC — $1,050,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $1,032,638 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT — $1,000,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetBEYOND HOUSING INC — $1,000,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE — $956,435 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY — $928,991 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION — $910,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetURBAN SCHOOLS HUMAN CAPITAL ACADEMY INC — $900,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetDREAM CHARTER SCHOOL — $875,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION — $851,622 over 8y, 0.3% of budget3DE NATIONAL LLC — $850,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetLIFT ORLANDO INC — $850,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetWilliam & Mary Foundation — $843,933 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION — $805,497 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMINDSPARK LEARNING — $800,000 over 2y, 32% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation — $788,977 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $785,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPURPOSE BUILT COMMUNITIES FOUNDATIONINC — $750,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetMississippi State University Foundation Inc — $744,087 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COLLEGE ACCESS PROGRAM — $725,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetThe Kansas University Endowment Association — $708,583 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH LEADERSHIP INITIATIVE INC — $700,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetWHITMAN-WALKER FOUNDATION INC — $680,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetActive Minds Inc — $675,000 over 2y, 7.9% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $659,818 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC — $659,673 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters Of America — $645,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA HEALTH & WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN TRUST — $635,900 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetTHE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN — $630,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNIDADES LATINAS UNIDAS EN SERVICO INC — $625,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INC — $625,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE — $601,964 over 8y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST BOOK ↗
  • Who funds THE PHD PROJECT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT USA ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI National ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BOARD FOR PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS ↗
  • Who funds NAF ↗
  • Who funds BATTIER TAKE CHARGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
  • Who funds BAYLOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ACADEMY OF ENGINEERING FUND ↗
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds URBAN SCHOOLS HUMAN CAPITAL ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds DREAM CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds 3DE NATIONAL LLC ↗
  • Who funds LIFT ORLANDO INC ↗
  • Who funds William & Mary Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MINDSPARK LEARNING ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds PURPOSE BUILT COMMUNITIES FOUNDATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds Mississippi State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COLLEGE ACCESS PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds The Kansas University Endowment Association ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Collegiate A…Ernst & Young Foundat…Deloitte FoundationAmerican Chemical Soc…Folds of Honor Founda…United Way of Bergen …Council of Independen…The Northrop Grumman …Tulsa Community Found…Ibm International Fou…Charles Koch Foundati…Strada Education Foun…
National Collegiate Athletic AssociationIN73.7× affinity48 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · Ernst & Young Foundation · Deloitte Foundation · American Chemical Society · Folds of Honor Foundation · United Way of Bergen County · Council of Independent Colleges · The Northrop Grumman Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Charles Koch Foundation · Strada Education Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Kpmg US Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Melwood Horticultural Training Center Inc — 73% of income from government
  • The Village for Families and Children — 50% of income from government
  • University of Delaware — 30% of income from government
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of America — 21% of income from government
  • Yale University — 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Bentley University — 1% of income from government
  • Seton Hall University — 1% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
  • Saint Peter's University — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
34report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 826 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home