Skip to content
Agilent Technologies Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Agilent Technologies Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
41
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$7.0MEducation$4.4MEmployment$1.6MInternational$916kScience & Tech$699kFood & Nutrition$543kEnvironment$333kHealth$321kOther$0
02FY2024 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $417k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.3M
  • $250k+2 grants · $3.1M
$25,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$942k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION$2,009,045
DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$1,043,585
SOS SAHEL USA INC$200,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$200,000
THE UK ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION$194,526
TECHNOSERVE INC$150,000
FRIENDS OF IHES INC$100,000
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$100,000
HAUS DES STIFTENS FUR UNTERNEHMEN & NON-PROFITS GGMBH$99,920
CHARITABLE GIVING$98,498
NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITYNEWRI$95,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE$50,000
CANADIAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION$31,527
SEEDING LABS A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION$25,000
UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 81% of grant dollars ($13M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 19% that went abroad ($3.1M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $539k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NATIONAL EDUCATION FOR ASSISTANCE DOG SERVICES INC: $250 → 11%THE PEACE CENTER INC: $250 → 6%HOSPICE OF THE FOOTHILLS: $700 → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $350 → 13%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF REDLANDS: $280 → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $4k → 14%SOS SAHEL USA INC: $200k → 15%THIRD PHASE INC: $2k → 5%MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $500 → 24%NVOLVE INC: $25k → 8%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $700 → 15%VALLEY OUTREACH: $250 → 6%MUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $25k → 8%THE FAMILY CENTER - LA FAMILIA: $350 → 11%FRIENDS OF THE FLETCHER FREE LIBRARY: $24k → 10%WARRIOR CANINE CONNECTION INC: $500 → 8%HOME OF THE INNOCENTS: $700 → 15%NETWORK OF VICTIM ASSISTANCE: $250 → 6%AUSTIN DIAPER BANK: $920 → 10%KIDS MOBILITY NETWORK INC: $1k → 8%HANDS OF THE CARPENTER: $1k → 7%CASA DE PAZ: $350 → 12%NVOLVE: $25k → 8%KIND TO KIDS FOUNDATION: $975 → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 10%BAPS CHARITIES INC: $306 → 8%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $5k → 10%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $280 → 10%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $100k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $69k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $500 → 14%FAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHERN CHESTER COUNTY: $694 → 6%KENNETT AREA SENIOR CENTER: $500 → 6%KENNETT AREA COMMUNITY SERVICE: $500 → 6%CHILDREN & FAMILIES FIRST ENDOWMENT INC: $580 → 10%OXFORD AREA NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES CENTER INC: $1k → 6%CITY SERVE OF THE TRI-VALLEY: $500 → 10%SERVICES & IMMIGRANT RIGHTS & EDUCATION NETWORK: $2k → 8%FAMILY PROMISE OF NORTHERN NEW CASTLE COUNTY INC: $2k → 10%ON YOUR FEET FOUNDATION NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $2k → 10%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $300 → 10%BAY AREA FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $500 → 8%MARTHAS KITCHEN: $1k → 8%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $1k → 8%ABILITIES UNITED: $688 → 8%ANIMAL ASSISTED HAPPINESS INC: $3k → 8%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SAN JOSE: $2k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $4k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 19% of all-years giving ($3.1M)

13 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$1.3M · 13 grants
Australia$698k · 8 grants
Singapore$303k · 3 grants
Germany$244k · 4 grants
India$172k · 2 grants
Japan$156k · 6 grants
Canada$93k · 15 grants
China$82k · 3 grants
Mexico$40k · 1 grant
Taiwan$25k · 3 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 50% of Agilent Technologies Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Agilent Technologies Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 20% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.1M · 31 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
704

Total granted

$7.1M
$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+32%

Still filing today

52%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $659k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $455k · revenue +63%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2019–2024 · $202k · revenue +39%
  • SI
    SCIENCE IS ELEMENTARY INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $84k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • C
    CYBERGRANTS
    one grant, 2018 · $430k
  • CE
    CYBERGRANTS EE MATCH
    one grant, 2019 · $221k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF INDIA
    one grant, 2021 · $149k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
6
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
10
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
11
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
12
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Northeastern & Central California; the most unlike its peers is Classical Arts Society of Houston. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

630 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 630 of the 774 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
124
Early backer (in before they grew)
622/630
Grantees still filing
472/630
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $6,383,839 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC+10 more: $243,758 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE: $650,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNETHE UK ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION: $515,627 · OtherTHE UK ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATIONQUEEN'S UNIVERSITY OF BELFAST FOUND: $500,000 · OtherQUEEN'S UNIVERSITY OF BELFAST FOUN…THE JK GROUP INC: $473,580 · OtherTHE JK GROUP INCCYBERGRANTS: $430,178 · OtherCYBERGRANTSNANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITYNEWRI: $270,000 · OtherNANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITYNE…CYBERGRANTS EE MATCH: $221,480 · OtherCHARITABLE GIVING: $198,639 · Other+101 more: $1,734,401 · Other+101 moreDELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,568,585 · EducationDELAWARE STATE UNIVERSI…Friends of IHES Inc: $200,600 · EducationFriends of IHES Inc+40 more: $563,411 · Education+40 moreInternational Rescue Committee INC: $455,122 · InternationalTECHNOSERVE INC: $150,000 · International+6 more: $56,651 · InternationalAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $202,035 · Human ServicesSOS SAHEL USA INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesNVOLVE INC: $49,400 · Human ServicesMUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $25,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF THE FLETCHER FREE LIBRARY: $24,045 · Human ServicesLund Family Center Inc: $20,000 · Human Services+11 more: $27,139 · Human ServicesTHE TECH INTERACTIVE: $25,140 · Arts & CultureSAN JOSE CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $10,000 · Arts & CultureRaleigh Symphony Orchestra Inc: $6,250 · Arts & CultureTHE EXPLORATORIUM: $5,835 · Arts & CultureWOW CHILDREN'S MUSEUM WORLD OF WONDER: $5,360 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $5,000 · Arts & CultureOpera Neo: $3,000 · Arts & CultureBOULDER COUNTY ARTS ALLIANCE INC: $3,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $6,794 · Arts & CultureSEEDING LABS A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION: $50,000 · Science & Tech
Philanthropy$6,627,597Other$4,993,905Education$3,332,596International$661,773Human Services$547,619Arts & Culture$70,379Science & Tech$50,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC: $6,383,839 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,568,585 over 3y, 10% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $455,122 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $202,035 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of IHES Inc: $200,600 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetTECHNOSERVE INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CANARY FUND DBA CANARY FOUNDATION: $95,562 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetUNITED WAY WORLDWIDE: $87,552 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSCIENCE IS ELEMENTARY INC: $84,328 over 2y, 15% of budgetSAN JOSE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetKeck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences: $70,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $52,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSEEDING LABS A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNVOLVE INC: $49,400 over 2y, 34% of budgetTHE TECH INTERACTIVE: $25,140 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROTECT OUR WINTERS: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetACHIEVEMENT REWARDS FOR COLLEGE SCIENTISTS FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSANA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE FLETCHER FREE LIBRARY: $24,045 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF GUEOUL INC: $23,800 over 1y, 20% of budgetDELAWARE BIOSCIENCE ASSOCIATION INC: $21,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetDELAWARE NATURE SOCIETY INC: $20,097 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetJunior Achievement of Northern California: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLund Family Center Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHarvey Mudd College: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $19,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Scranton: $12,998 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $12,929 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN CHESTER COUNTY: $12,617 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $11,220 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN JOSE CHILDREN'S DISCOVERY MUSEUM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMEDICAL COLLEGE OF VA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget826 BOSTON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIowa Biotechnology Association: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetASM MATERIALS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE KEYSTONE SCIENCE SCHOOL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDONALD N PARODI MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST: $8,800 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $8,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $7,115 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $6,751 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $6,701 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS LIONS CAMP INC: $6,509 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRaleigh Symphony Orchestra Inc: $6,250 over 1y, 11% of budgetSAN CARLOS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EXPLORATORIUM: $5,835 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBULLIS-PURISSIMA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $5,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Friends of IHES Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOS SAHEL USA INC ↗
  • Who funds TECHNOSERVE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CANARY FUND DBA CANARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY WORLDWIDE ↗
  • Who funds SCIENCE IS ELEMENTARY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN JOSE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Keck Graduate Institute of Applied Life Sciences ↗
  • Who funds THE MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SEEDING LABS A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds NVOLVE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Los Altos Mountain Vi…The Intuit FoundationSan Jose Mercury News…The Sobrato Family Fo…United Way of DelawareBright Funds Foundati…Rotary Club of San Jo…Gordon E and Betty I …Delaware Community Fo…The David and Lucile …Wsfs Cares FoundationDestination Home SV c…
Los Altos Mountain View Community FoundationCA60.8× affinity33 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · The Intuit Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · The Sobrato Family Foundation · United Way of Delaware · Bright Funds Foundation · Rotary Club of San Jose Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Delaware Community Foundation Inc · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Wsfs Cares Foundation · Destination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Agilent Technologies Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Agilent Technologies Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Family Promise of Northern New Castle County: 73% of income from government
  • Kind to Kids Foundation: 69% of income from government
  • United Way of Delaware: 58% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Lund Family Center Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Food Bank of Delaware Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Delaware Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Faithful Friends Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Delaware Nature Society Inc: 13% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • The Morgan State University Foundation Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Gaining Ground Inc: 5% of income from government
  • 826 Boston Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Seeding Labs a Non-Profit Corporation: 1% of income from government
  • Delaware Bioscience Association Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
40report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 774 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Agilent Technologies’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home