Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

REGIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION

REGIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION (California) receives grants from 66 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,690,278 to it, the largest being KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ($475,000). 32 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 54% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$4.0M
Funders on record
66
Grants received
$2.7M
Net assets
$23M
32/66 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 10%
01What it does

What Regional Parks Foundation does

Mission

The Regional Parks Foundation encourages private contributions in support of the east bay regional park district.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Program

  1. Youth development: the foundation is committed to ensuring more young people can learn from and enjoy life-changing experiences in the parks. Through hands-on science education and outdoor skills, we inspire the next generation of environmental leaders. Our youth programs give local students the chance to learn about the environment and connect with nature in their own neighborhoods, helping them become the park stewards of tomorrowhealth, wellness & safety: spending time in nature boosts both our mental and physical well-being. The Regional Parks Foundation supports healthier communities by helping people get outdoors and stay active. We provide everything from water safety programs and trail gear to rescue equipment, giving park visitors and staff the tools and confidence they need to safely enjoy our parks and recreational spaces. Environmental stewardship: as extreme weather events and industrial activities continue to shape our world, the foundation works to protect habitats and wildlife so they can not only survive but thrive. We invest in and support community engagement, education, and stewardship efforts to keep natural habitats and surrounding communities safe and…

    $2,290,981 spentof which $2,290,981 as grants
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2025 Form 990. Program spending in total: $2,290,981.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($3.5M) Expenses 100 ($1.6M) Net assets 100 ($6.3M)2018 Revenue 91 ($3.2M) Expenses 120 ($2.0M) Net assets 109 ($6.9M)2019 Revenue 136 ($4.7M) Expenses 144 ($2.4M) Net assets 156 ($9.8M)2020 Revenue 148 ($5.1M) Expenses 206 ($3.4M) Net assets 199 ($13M)2021 Revenue 204 ($7.1M) Expenses 119 ($2.0M) Net assets 295 ($19M)2022 Revenue 94 ($3.3M) Expenses 99 ($1.6M) Net assets 284 ($18M)2023 Revenue 83 ($2.9M) Expenses 104 ($1.7M) Net assets 342 ($21M)2024 Revenue 116 ($4.0M) Expenses 218 ($3.6M) Net assets 370 ($23M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (116)Expenses (218)Net assets (370)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $13M to $19M (+46%).

$6.3M
$7.0M
$9.9M
$13M
$19M
$18M
$22M
$24M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$1.8M
’17
$1.2M
’18
$2.3M
’19
$1.7M
’20
$5.1M
’21
$1.6M
’22
$1.2M
’23
$426k
’24
1.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Holly Potter

Board chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed2118212019201718
Joined·+5+4+2+0+3+4+3
No longer listed·8131272
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 11 funders to 21 funders, grant income fell $316k → $275k.

10 of 66 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 54% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of REGIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 66 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

REGIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 18% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

81% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund REGIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION.

18%
largest funder
45%
top three
~10
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 52% · 2018 31% · 2019 35% · 2020 36% · 2021 17% · 2022 20% · 2023 21% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

31% of REGIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 48% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

54% of REGIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $1.2M that is directly attributable, 85% of it comes from California funders.

WA
MI
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CA
NE
MO
VA
MD
DE
NC
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $1.4M arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like REGIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

73% of spending goes to programs.

Program 73%Management 16%Fundraising 11%

Governance

17
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

81%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • East Bay Regional Park District · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for REGIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds REGIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION?
REGIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION (California) receives grants from 66 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,690,278 to it, the largest being KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ($475,000). 32 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 54% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does REGIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION have?
IRS filings report 66 organizations giving $2,690,278 in grants to REGIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION, 32 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of REGIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION?
KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS is the largest funder on record, with $475,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like REGIONAL PARKS FOUNDATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 66 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing