· Private foundation
Aetna Foundation Inc
Its FY2021 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2021
- Under $10k5 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k29 grants · $644k
- $50k–250k23 grants · $2.3M
- $250k+8 grants · $4.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION INC | $1,000,000 |
| PARTNERS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC | $500,000 |
| PARTNERS HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC | $500,000 |
| HARTFORD BISHOPS FOUNDATION INC | $500,000 |
| UPSTREAM USA INC | $500,000 |
| AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION INC | $499,838 |
| UPSTREAM USA INC | $400,000 |
| NORTHERN SHENANDOAH SUBSTANCE ABUSE COALITION | $250,000 |
| AMERICARES INC | $225,000 |
| NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL NURSES INC | $213,750 |
| NORTHERN SHENANDOAH SUBSTANCE ABUSE COALITION | $150,000 |
| HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC | $136,195 |
| CRISIS TEXT LINE INC | $135,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT HEALTH CENTER | $126,560 |
| NORTH CAROLINA HARM REDUCTION COALITION INC | $125,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $842k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
29 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2021, 0 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $940k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- APAMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION2× · 2020–2021 · $1.4M · revenue +54%
AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC2× · 2020–2021 · $1.1M · revenue +28%- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc2× · 2020–2021 · $841k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- PDPENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHone grant, 2020 · $350k
- IIINTERCOMMUNITY INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue +61%
- JCJERSEY CARES INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $148k · revenue +31%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
See schedule ouniversity of new haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts & professional education.
Advancing health through research, education, clinical practice, and community partnerships; providing each person the best care in the right place, at the right time, every time.
Uniting communities to alleviate hunger.
To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.
The humane compassionate treatment of all animals.
Children's services
Animal welfare organization
Improving the lives of animals and people through advocacy, education, and support.
Central maine healthcare corporation supports its affiliated healthcare institutions in order for these entities to provide exceptional healthcare services.
Provide sanctuary to wild cats in need and inspire change to end the captive wildlife crisis.
Offer a challenging education that develops the qualities of mind, spirit and body for students.
To ensure healthy outcomes for all children in connecticut by advancing effective policies, stronger systems, and innovative practices.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kingdom Rock. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1537 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1537 of the 2,000 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Upstream USA Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN SHENANDOAH VALLEY SUBSTANCE USE COALITION ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA ALCOHOL & DRUG ABUSE ASSOC ↗
- Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds CRISIS TEXT LINE INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD ↗
- Who funds BILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ARCHDIOCESE OF HARTFORD ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL NURSES ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL HISPANIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds National Medical Association ↗
- Who funds HOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds INTERCOMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN NURSES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF PROVIDENCE ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA HARM REDUCTION COALITION ↗
- Who funds JERSEY CARES INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY INC UNITED WAY OF CENT & NE CONNECTICUT ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CVS HEALTH EMPLOYEE RELIEF FUND ↗
- Who funds OUR PIECE OF THE PIE INC ↗
- Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds FOODSHARE INC ↗
- Who funds COPPER BEECH INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF HARTFORD ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The William and Alice Mortensen Foundation · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · J Walton Bissell Foundation Inc · United Way Inc United Way of Cent & Ne Connecticut · Sbm Charitable Foundation Inc · American Savings Foundation Inc · The Maximilian E and Marion O Hoffman Foundation Inc · The Fund for Greater Hartford Inc · The Ahearn Family Foundation · Sandra & Arnold Chase Family Foundation Inc · The Robert & Margaret Patricelli Family Foundation · Rockville Bank Community Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Aetna Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Health Center Assoc of Connecticut Inc — 85% of income from government
- Blue Hills Civic Association — 72% of income from government
- Operation Fuel Incorporated — 51% of income from government
- Redlands Christian Migrant Association Inc — 51% of income from government
- The Village for Families and Children — 50% of income from government
- Institute for Community Research Inc — 48% of income from government
- Catholic Charities Inc Archdiocese of Hartford — 39% of income from government
- Intercommunity Inc — 34% of income from government
- Greater Hartford Arts Council Inc — 24% of income from government
- Our Piece of the Pie Inc — 21% of income from government
- The Boys and Girls Clubs of Hartford — 20% of income from government
- Hands On Hartford Inc — 20% of income from government
- Lawyers for Children America Inc — 19% of income from government
- National Association of School Nurses — 15% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc — 10% of income from government
- Community Health Center Inc — 10% of income from government
- Ywca Hartford Region Inc — 7% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Hill-Stead Museum — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Jersey Cares Inc — 6% of income from government
- Loyola University Maryland Inc — 6% of income from government
- Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
- Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art — 5% of income from government
- Connecticut Children's Medical Center — 5% of income from government
- Upstream Usa Inc — 4% of income from government
- Old Sturbridge Inc — 4% of income from government
- Theaterworks Inc — 3% of income from government
- Hartford Stage Company Inc — 3% of income from government
- Connecticut Public Broadcasting Inc — 3% of income from government
- Jack and Jill Children's Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Riverfront Recapture Inc — 2% of income from government
- Girl Scouts of Connecticut Inc — 2% of income from government
- United Way of Northeast Florida Inc — 2% of income from government
- University of Hartford — 1% of income from government
- Mcphs University — 1% of income from government
- Nantucket Historical Association — 1% of income from government
- The Connecticut Historical Society Connecticut Museum of Culture & History — 1% of income from government
- The United Way of Lee County Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Children's Home Inc — 0% of income from government
- Hartford Hospital — 0% of income from government
- High Hopes Therapeutic Riding Inc — 0% of income from government
- Hartford Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
- Williams College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Aetna Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Aetna Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.