Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

Bellingham Festival of Music

Bellingham Festival of Music (Washington) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $310,604 to it, the largest being WHATCOM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($126,456). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 67% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$770k
Funders on record
10
Grants received
$311k
Net assets
$903k
5/10 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 14%
01What it does

What Bellingham Festival of Music does

Mission

To provide world class orchestra & chamber music concerts, master classes, educational rehearsals and other music education opportunities, and pre-concert lectures for audiences in the Pacific Northwest at an affordable price and/or for free.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Program

  1. The Bellingham Festival of Music assembled an orchestra of musicians from the major orchestras in North America, many of which hold the principal chair in their home orchestra. In addition, world class guest artists performed with the orchestra. Throughout the year the Festival supports robust music education programs and outreach in the local schools and community.

    $678,450 spentof which $10,000 as grants$769,991 earned by the program
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2025 Form 990. Program spending in total: $678,450.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($501k) Expenses 100 ($447k) Net assets 100 ($359k)2018 Revenue 99 ($494k) Expenses 110 ($490k) Net assets 101 ($363k)2019 Revenue 100 ($498k) Expenses 108 ($481k) Net assets 106 ($381k)2020 Revenue 41 ($208k) Expenses 24 ($106k) Net assets 134 ($482k)2021 Revenue 64 ($319k) Expenses 45 ($201k) Net assets 167 ($600k)2022 Revenue 105 ($527k) Expenses 110 ($492k) Net assets 177 ($634k)2023 Revenue 115 ($575k) Expenses 115 ($516k) Net assets 193 ($694k)2024 Revenue 164 ($819k) Expenses 145 ($647k) Net assets 241 ($865k)2025 Revenue 154 ($770k) Expenses 164 ($732k) Net assets 252 ($903k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (154)Expenses (164)Net assets (252)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $700k to $866k (+24%).

$360k
$364k
$391k
$483k
$600k
$644k
$700k
$866k
$905k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 6% · 2018 6% · 2019 4% · 2020 5% · 2021 4% · 2022 5% · 2023 2% · 2024 5% · 2025 4%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

78% of Bellingham Festival of Music’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (64% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 19,547 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$54k
’17
$4k
’18
$18k
’19
$102k
’20
$118k
’21
$35k
’22
$59k
’23
$172k
’24
$38k
’25
15
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Ron Woodard

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed191816161817151715
Joined·+2+0+1+3+0+0+2+5
No longer listed·32111207
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 5 funders to 3 funders, grant income rose $23k → $27k.

5 of 10 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 67% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Bellingham Festival of Music’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Bellingham Festival of Music leans on a few funders — its largest provides 41% of grant income and the top three 89%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

67% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Bellingham Festival of Music.

41%
largest funder
89%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 38% · 2018 51% · 2019 41% · 2020 52% · 2021 75% · 2022 76% · 2023 62% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

29% of Bellingham Festival of Music's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 50% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

67% of Bellingham Festival of Music's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $101k that is directly attributable, 95% of it comes from funders outside Washington, across 3 states.

WA
CT
CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $209k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Bellingham Festival of Music holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 11,634 arts & culture nonprofits its size.

Operating margin5% · above the median
Months of reserve14.7mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)6% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 11,634 arts & culture nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like Bellingham Festival of Music

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

93% of spending goes to programs.

Program 93%Management 3%Fundraising 4%

Governance

15
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

97%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

WA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Bellingham Festival of Music: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Bellingham Festival of Music?
Bellingham Festival of Music (Washington) receives grants from 10 organizations whose IRS filings report $310,604 to it, the largest being WHATCOM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($126,456). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 67% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does Bellingham Festival of Music have?
IRS filings report 10 organizations giving $310,604 in grants to Bellingham Festival of Music, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Bellingham Festival of Music?
WHATCOM COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $126,456 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Bellingham Festival of Music find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 10 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing