Skip to content

Louisiana · Nonprofit

CEDAR CREEK SCHOOLS

CEDAR CREEK SCHOOLS (Louisiana) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $95,353 to it, the largest being COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH LOUISIANA ($81,315). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 97% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$6.9M
Funders on record
5
Grants received
$95k
Net assets
$7.3M
2/5 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%
01What it does

What Cedar Creek Schools does

Mission

To provide a superior college preparatory educational experience to its students.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. The effectiveness of cedar creek's curriculum is apparent in the students' academic accomplishments, such as the high number of ap scholars and admission to prestigious colleges. Advanced honors courses are available to academically gifted students beginning in the sixth grade. Dual enrollment and instructional partnerships with louisiana tech university provide rich and rigorous classroom experiences. Stem curriculum begins in elementary school with coding and robotics. Students have opportunities to demonstrate their learning through academic competitions such as the louisiana high school literary rally, the scholastic art and writing awards, and various organization conferences. Cedar creek's curriculum also offers experiences beyond the classroom such as, field trips, community service, national and international travel, academic and arts competitions, clubs and organizations, and more.

    $3,814,449 spentof which $4,940 as grants$5,065,491 earned by the program
    92% of program spending
  2. Cedar creek athletics offer cross country, football, girls and boys basketball, softball, baseball, track and field, golf, tennis, swimming, and powerlifting. A number of these programs, along with private lessons and camps, are also available to younger students. Cedar creek is extremely competitive in lhsaa athletics, and many graduates have been signed to ncaa collegiate programs. Some of cedar creek's recent state championships include softball, girls and boys cross country, and powerlifting.

    $194,070 spent$58,758 earned by the program
    5% of program spending
  3. Cedar creek makes other services available to students such as after school care and transportation.

    $133,724 spent$87,453 earned by the program
    3% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $4,142,243.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($6.6M) Expenses 100 ($5.7M) Net assets 100 ($5.8M)2018 Revenue 98 ($6.5M) Expenses 102 ($5.8M) Net assets 111 ($6.5M)2019 Revenue 93 ($6.1M) Expenses 99 ($5.6M) Net assets 120 ($6.9M)2020 Revenue 88 ($5.8M) Expenses 101 ($5.8M) Net assets 120 ($7.0M)2021 Revenue 102 ($6.7M) Expenses 100 ($5.7M) Net assets 138 ($8.0M)2022 Revenue 88 ($5.8M) Expenses 101 ($5.7M) Net assets 134 ($7.8M)2023 Revenue 92 ($6.0M) Expenses 98 ($5.6M) Net assets 144 ($8.4M)2024 Revenue 105 ($6.9M) Expenses 103 ($5.8M) Net assets 125 ($7.3M)2025 Revenue 104 ($6.9M) Expenses 110 ($6.3M) Net assets 127 ($7.3M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (104)Expenses (110)Net assets (127)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $14M to $10M (−27%).

$13M
$14M
$14M
$10M
$9.4M
$8.4M
$9.5M
$7.6M
$7.5M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2021 12% · 2022 2% · 2024 1% · 2025 1%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$892k
’17
$666k
’18
$475k
’19
$22k
’20
$1.0M
’21
$74k
’22
$459k
’23
$1.1M
’24
$607k
’25
1.3
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed1099976101011
Joined·+1+0+0+3+1+6+2+2
No longer listed·20052221
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base held at 3 funders, grant income rose $3k → $35k.

3 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 97% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $2.0M from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest Green and Gold Academics and Athletics Inc). These are real filings, and they are not money CEDAR CREEK SCHOOLS raised.

From the IRS filings of CEDAR CREEK SCHOOLS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

CEDAR CREEK SCHOOLS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 85% of grant income and the top three 98%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

97% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CEDAR CREEK SCHOOLS.

85%
largest funder
98%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 78% · 2021 98% · 2022 99% · 2023 71% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

97% of CEDAR CREEK SCHOOLS's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $3k that is directly attributable, 83% of it comes from funders outside Louisiana, across 2 states.

CT
LA

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $92k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like CEDAR CREEK SCHOOLS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Louisiana

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

95% of spending goes to programs.

Program 95%Management 5%Fundraising 0%

Governance

11
board members
91%
independent
–Conflict-of-interest policy–Whistleblower policy–Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Footprint & structure

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Green and Gold Academics · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CEDAR CREEK SCHOOLS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds CEDAR CREEK SCHOOLS?
CEDAR CREEK SCHOOLS (Louisiana) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $95,353 to it, the largest being COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH LOUISIANA ($81,315). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 97% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does CEDAR CREEK SCHOOLS have?
IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $95,353 in grants to CEDAR CREEK SCHOOLS, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of CEDAR CREEK SCHOOLS?
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH LOUISIANA is the largest funder on record, with $81,315 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like CEDAR CREEK SCHOOLS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Louisiana. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Cedar Creek Schools →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 5 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing