· Private foundation
The William and Alice Mortensen Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k20 grants · $122k
- $10k–50k34 grants · $434k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $160k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| REAL ART WAYS | $60,000 |
| UCONN FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| CHARTER OAK CULTURAL CENTER | $50,000 |
| FIRST NIGHT HARTFORD | $30,000 |
| HARTFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY | $26,020 |
| WADSWORTH ATHENEUM MUSEUM OF ART | $20,000 |
| NEW ENGLAND AIR MUSEUM | $17,500 |
| NEW BRITAIN MUSEUM OF ART INC | $15,587 |
| CONNECTICUT SCIENCE CENTER | $15,466 |
| SOUTH PARK INN | $15,000 |
| CONNECTICUT PUBLIC BROADCASTING NETWORK | $15,000 |
| NEW HORIZONS INC | $15,000 |
| ELIZABETH PARK CONSERVANCY INC | $15,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF HARTFORD | $13,740 |
| FRESH START PALLET INC | $12,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $443k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
114 repeat relationships — 54 still active in FY2025, 60 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- THTHE HORACE BUSHNELL MEMORIAL HALL7× · 2017–2024 · $596k · revenue +101%
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $526k · revenue +79%
- RRRIVERFRONT RECAPTURE INC5× · 2017–2023 · $279k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- RLRUSSELL LIBRARYone grant, 2020 · $53k
- MHMALTA HOUSE OF CARE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2020 · $38k · revenue 0%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCHOOL OF LAWone grant, 2023 · $35k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To preserve historically significant properties in the hartford community, purchasing same, if possible, and maintaining them as historical landmarks.
Hartford Preservation Alliance's primary mission is to preserve and revitalize Hartford's unique architectural heritage and neighborhood character.
The connecticut housing coalition works to expand housing opportunity and to increase the quantity and quality of affordable housing available to people with low and moderate incomes in connecticut through advocacy, education and…
The hartford foundation for public giving puts philanthropy into action to create lasting solutions that result in vibrant communities within the greater hartford region. as the region's community foundation, it is a public, grantmaking…
The Hospital of Central Connecticut is dedicated to fostering, sustaining and improving the health status of the people in the communities we serve.
To compete aggressively and successfully for jobs, talent and capital.
To improve the health and healing of the people and communities we serve.
Protect Connecticuts farmland for agricultural use by purchasing and accepting donations of agricultural conservation easements
Dedicated to learning, personal growth, knowledge creation, and the betterment of society. the university engages students in aquiring the knowledge, skills, and values necessary to thrive in and contribute to a pluralistic, complex world.
The association is the leader in providing services to and advocating for, the state's providers of long-term, subacute, rehabilitative, and assisted living care. additionally, the association serves as a clearing house for information…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
To provide medical services for the residents of the greater hartford connecticut area. to provide quality health care services to low and moderate income individuals in the greater hartford connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hartford Performs Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ethel Walker Charitable and Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
118 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 118 of the 171 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE HORACE BUSHNELL MEMORIAL HALL ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE MARK TWAIN MEMORIAL ↗
- Who funds RIVERFRONT RECAPTURE INC ↗
- Who funds KNOX INC ↗
- Who funds HARTFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT AERONAUTICAL HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds HARTFORD INTERVAL HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HILL-STEAD MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds FIRST NIGHT HARTFORD INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT VETERANS LEGAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HARTFORD SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CONNECTICUT INC ↗
- Who funds FORGE CITY WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds CHARTER OAK TEMPLE RESTORATION ASSOC D/B/A CHARTER OAK CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF HARTFORD ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SAINT JOSEPH ↗
- Who funds ELIZABETH PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION FUEL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds HARC INC ↗
- Who funds NEW BRITAIN MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTIKIDS INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds NEW HORIZONS INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT SCIENCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Cinestudio Inc ↗
- Who funds AURORA WOMEN AND GIRLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HARTFORD CHORALE INC ↗
- Who funds FOODSHARE INC ↗
- Who funds REAL ART WAYS INC ↗
- Who funds THE ANTIQUARIAN & LANDMARKS SOCIETY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · J Walton Bissell Foundation Inc · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · The Maximilian E and Marion O Hoffman Foundation Inc · Sbm Charitable Foundation Inc · Connecticut Humanities Council Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc · The Zachs Family Foundation Inc · The Betty Knox Foundation Inc · United Way Inc United Way of Cent & Ne Connecticut · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · Edward C & Ann T Roberts Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The William and Alice Mortensen Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- IQuilt Partnership Inc — 100% of income from government
- Harc Inc — 92% of income from government
- Jewish Association for Community Living Inc — 84% of income from government
- Mercy Housing & Shelter Corporation — 77% of income from government
- The Bridge Family Center Inc — 61% of income from government
- The Open Hearth Association — 59% of income from government
- Community Solutions Inc — 55% of income from government
- Operation Fuel Incorporated — 51% of income from government
- The Village for Families and Children — 50% of income from government
- Noah Webster House Inc — 46% of income from government
- Connecticut Harm Reduction Alliance Inc — 43% of income from government
- Special Olympics Connecticut Inc — 42% of income from government
- Building Healthy Families — 41% of income from government
- Connecticut River Watershed Council Inc — 40% of income from government
- Horizons Inc — 39% of income from government
- Real Art Ways Inc — 38% of income from government
- American School at Hartford for the Deaf — 32% of income from government
- South Park Inn Inc — 29% of income from government
- 4-H Education Center at Auerfarm Inc — 25% of income from government
- The Mark Twain Memorial — 22% of income from government
- She Leads Justice Inc — 22% of income from government
- The Boys and Girls Clubs of Hartford — 20% of income from government
- Hands On Hartford Inc — 20% of income from government
- Ebony Horsewomen Inc — 18% of income from government
- Coram Deo Inc — 17% of income from government
- Big Brothers Big Sisters of Connecticut Inc — 15% of income from government
- Connecticut Science Center Inc — 14% of income from government
- Connecticut Veterans Legal Center Inc — 12% of income from government
- Natchaug Hospital Inc — 11% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc — 10% of income from government
- Seniors Job Bank Inc — 8% of income from government
- New Britain Museum of American Art Inc — 7% of income from government
- Hill-Stead Museum — 7% of income from government
- Wadsworth Atheneum Museum of Art — 5% of income from government
- Harriet Beecher Stowe Center Inc — 4% of income from government
- New Horizons Inc — 4% of income from government
- Hartford Stage Company Inc — 3% of income from government
- Hartford Performs Inc — 3% of income from government
- Riverfront Recapture Inc — 2% of income from government
- Knox Inc — 2% of income from government
- University of Saint Joseph — 2% of income from government
- Hartford Artisans Weaving Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Forge City Works Inc — 1% of income from government
- First Night Hartford Inc — 1% of income from government
- Goodspeed Opera House Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Healing Meals Foundation Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Hartford Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- Trinity College — 0% of income from government
- Aurora Women and Girls Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Hartford Marathon Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.