· Private foundation
J Walton Bissell Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k20 grants · $115k
- $10k–50k65 grants · $943k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHARTER OAK AMATEUR BOXING ACADEMY | $25,000 |
| UNDERGROUND NE THE | $25,000 |
| MCEVIR INC DBA MAKERSPACECT | $25,000 |
| SECOND CHANCE RE-ENTRY INITIATIVE PROGRAM | $25,000 |
| URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER HARTFORD THE | $20,000 |
| CONNECTICUT PUERTO RICAN FORUM INC | $20,000 |
| BUSHNELL PARK FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| REAL ART WAYS | $20,000 |
| URISE VENTURES | $20,000 |
| HARRIET BEECHER STOWE CENTER | $20,000 |
| SPECTRUM IN MOTION DANCE THEATER ENSEMBLE INC | $20,000 |
| RE- CENTER RACE & EQUITY IN EDUCATION | $20,000 |
| THEATERWORKS | $20,000 |
| GREATER HARTFORD FESTIVAL OF JAZZ | $20,000 |
| COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN ACTION | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $530k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
102 repeat relationships — 62 still active in FY2024, 40 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $245k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- COCHARTER OAK AMATEUR BOXING ACADEMY AND YOUTH DEV PROGRAM INC3× · 2020–2024 · $95k · revenue +271% · 29% of their budget
- BBBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CONNECTICUT INC4× · 2020–2024 · $80k · revenue +101%
- CPCOMMUNITY PARTNERS IN ACTION INC4× · 2020–2024 · $78k · revenue +111%
Funded once
- UWUNITED WAY INC (CONNECTICUT UNITED WAY COVID-19 RESPONSE FUND)one grant, 2020 · $150k
- HKHARTFORD KNIGHTS CORP (MASKS MATTER COLLABORATIVE PROJECT)one grant, 2020 · $53k
- HIHARTFORD INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOR RELIGION AND PEACEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +145%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The connecticut housing coalition works to expand housing opportunity and to increase the quantity and quality of affordable housing available to people with low and moderate incomes in connecticut through advocacy, education and…
To compete aggressively and successfully for jobs, talent and capital.
To be an educational, cultural, social and recreational "safe have" of opportunity for the diverse ethnic populations of Greater Hartford
To promote and enhance the city of hartford by providing uniformed guides who provide information and assistance to the public in the downtown and other areas of hartford.
Hartford Preservation Alliance's primary mission is to preserve and revitalize Hartford's unique architectural heritage and neighborhood character.
Community action agency of new haven, inc. offers pathways to prosperity to those in poverty in the greater new haven area through: service - collaboration - advocacy - knowledge generation.
We encourage Connecticut residents to participate in government and their communities and we conduct public interest lobbying to advocate for consumer and environmental concerns.
The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.
To grow the local economy and improve economic stability in all communities by providing employers with a trained and qualified workforce and connecting residents to jobs.
The mission of the connecticut association for community action is to strengthen the capacities of its members to empower people in need and improve the communities in which they live.
The connecticut project, a 501c3 organization, brings together people, ideas, and resources to build opportunity.
We exist to be a catalyst for the arts and promote an equitable arts ecosystem in Greater Hartford.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hartford Performs Inc and the most unlike its peers is Music and Poetry Synchronized Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
132 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 132 of the 161 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HARTFORD FOUNDATION FOR PUBLIC GIVING ↗
- Who funds RECENTER RACE & EQUITY IN EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHARTER OAK AMATEUR BOXING ACADEMY AND YOUTH DEV PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CONNECTICUT INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS IN ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds LOVE146 INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND CHANCE RE-ENTRY INITIATIVE PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds KNOX INC ↗
- Who funds COMPASS YOUTH COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds THE ARTISTS COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY INC UNITED WAY OF CENT & NE CONNECTICUT ↗
- Who funds FORGE CITY WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds BUSHNELL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds CHARTER OAK TEMPLE RESTORATION ASSOC D/B/A CHARTER OAK CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR LATINO PROGRESS CONNECTICUT PUERTO RICAN FORUM INC ↗
- Who funds PRUDENCE CRANDALL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds The Riseup Group Inc ↗
- Who funds CAMP COURANT INC ↗
- Who funds iQuilt Partnership Inc ↗
- Who funds HANDS ON HARTFORD INC ↗
- Who funds GRACE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds HARTFORD CITY MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER HARTFORD FESTIVAL OF JAZZ INC ↗
- Who funds HARTFORD PERFORMS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BRAILLE PRESS INC ↗
- Who funds HARTFORD INTERVAL HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds INTEGRATED REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds HARTFORD PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds THE VILLAGE FOR FAMILIES AND CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds MALTA HOUSE OF CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds REAL ART WAYS INC ↗
- Who funds Hartford Health Inititative Inc ↗
- Who funds Ebony Horsewomen Inc ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT NEWS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTIKIDS INC ↗
- Who funds IMMACARE INC ↗
- Who funds KENEY PARK SUSTAINABILITY PROJECT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Farmington Bank Community Foundation Inc · The Betty Knox Foundation Inc · The William and Alice Mortensen Foundation · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · United Way Inc United Way of Cent & Ne Connecticut · William Caspar Graustein Memorial Fund · Sbm Charitable Foundation Inc · The Maximilian E and Marion O Hoffman Foundation Inc · The Fund for Greater Hartford Inc · American Savings Foundation Inc · Aetna Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization J Walton Bissell Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- IQuilt Partnership Inc — 100% of income from government
- Chrysalis Center Inc — 93% of income from government
- Harc Inc — 92% of income from government
- Community Partners in Action Inc — 90% of income from government
- Friendship Service Center Inc — 85% of income from government
- Jewish Association for Community Living Inc — 84% of income from government
- Mercy Housing & Shelter Corporation — 77% of income from government
- Blue Hills Civic Association — 72% of income from government
- Connecticut Network for Children and Youth Inc — 70% of income from government
- Hartford Knights Corp — 68% of income from government
- Organized Parents Make a Difference Inc — 66% of income from government
- Brain Injury Alliance of Connecticut — 62% of income from government
- The Bridge Family Center Inc — 61% of income from government
- The Open Hearth Association — 59% of income from government
- Immacare Inc — 52% of income from government
- Operation Fuel Incorporated — 51% of income from government
- The Village for Families and Children — 50% of income from government
- The Diaper Bank of Connecticut Inc — 49% of income from government
- LOVE146 Inc — 49% of income from government
- Real Art Ways Inc — 38% of income from government
- Keney Park Sustainability Project — 37% of income from government
- Integrated Refugee and Immigrant Services — 37% of income from government
- The Artists Collective Inc — 35% of income from government
- Covenant to Care for Children Inc — 35% of income from government
- Prudence Crandall Center Inc — 30% of income from government
- South Park Inn Inc — 29% of income from government
- My Sisters' Place Inc — 26% of income from government
- Connecticut Council for Philanthropy — 24% of income from government
- Second Chance Re-Entry Initiative Program — 23% of income from government
- She Leads Justice Inc — 22% of income from government
- Our Piece of the Pie Inc — 21% of income from government
- The Boys and Girls Clubs of Hartford — 20% of income from government
- Hockanum Valley Community Council — 20% of income from government
- Hands On Hartford Inc — 20% of income from government
- Lawyers for Children America Inc — 19% of income from government
- Ebony Horsewomen Inc — 18% of income from government
- Big Brothers Big Sisters of Connecticut Inc — 15% of income from government
- Arts for Learning Connecticut — 14% of income from government
- Compass Youth Collaborative — 13% of income from government
- Connecticut Veterans Legal Center Inc — 12% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc — 10% of income from government
- Community First School Inc — 9% of income from government
- Night Fall Inc — 8% of income from government
- Urban League of Greater Hartford Inc — 8% of income from government
- Ywca Hartford Region Inc — 7% of income from government
- Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
- Center for Childrens Advocacy Inc — 5% of income from government
- Harriet Beecher Stowe Center Inc — 4% of income from government
- Theaterworks Inc — 3% of income from government
- The Carroll Center for the Blind Inc — 3% of income from government
- Layavinyasa Company — 3% of income from government
- Hartford Stage Company Inc — 3% of income from government
- Hartford Performs Inc — 3% of income from government
- Queen Ann Nzinga Center Inc — 3% of income from government
- Hartford Health Inititative Inc — 2% of income from government
- Justice Dance Performance Project Inc — 2% of income from government
- Knox Inc — 2% of income from government
- Cuatro Puntos Inc — 2% of income from government
- Connecticut Ballet Inc — 2% of income from government
- Hartford Artisans Weaving Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Forge City Works Inc — 1% of income from government
- First Night Hartford Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Riseup Group Inc — 1% of income from government
- Connecticut Immigrant & Refugee Coalition — 0% of income from government
- Hartford Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- National Braille Press Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to J Walton Bissell Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to J Walton Bissell Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.