Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Tides Center

TIDES CENTER provides social change leaders comprehensive fiscal sponsorship - including operational, grantmaking, and capacity-building support - to propel the work of community-led organizations.

$51M
Granted FY2024still arriving
461
Grants FY2024still arriving
42
States reached
$13M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Civil Rights$152MEmployment$68MPhilanthropy$56MCrime & Legal$43MEnvironment$27MHealth$26MArts & Culture$22MEducation$21MOther$0
02FY2024 · 461 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k33 grants · $228k
  • $10k–50k260 grants · $5.5M
  • $50k–250k148 grants · $13M
  • $250k+20 grants · $36M
$25,000
Median grant
42
States reached
$297M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TIDES ADVOCACY$13,095,792
TIDES FOUNDATION$8,837,683
TRANSFORMING RESEARCH INTO ACTION TO IMPROVE THE LIVES OF STUDENTS$5,362,697
WOMEN BUILDING UP INC$1,459,854
HASER INC$826,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY$800,723
COUNTY OF SOLANO$725,000
ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC$621,200
GIVSUM FOUNDATION$457,012
REINVENT SOUTH STOCKTON COALITION$447,014
THE BRONX DOCUMENTARY CENTER$421,900
FIRST FOCUS ON CHILDREN$405,000
WESTERN ORGANIZATION OF RESOURCE EDUCATION PROJECT$400,000
MOUNTAIN ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT$400,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS$400,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $33.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LOFT THE LESBIAN AND GAY COMMUNITY SERVICES CENTER INC: $201k → 9%LOFT THE LESBIAN AND GAY COMMUNITY SERVICES CENTER INC: $101k → 9%REALITY SPEAKING INC: $100k → 7%WORKER S CENTER OF CENTRAL NEW YORK INC: $123k → 14%FIERCE ADVOCATES FAMILIES AND INDIVIDUALS EQUITABLY ROOTED IN CO: $996k → 9%WILLOW DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $113k → 14%VILLAGE CONNECT INC: $150k → 10%VILLAGE CONNECT INC: $100k → 10%FILIPINO AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $288k → 10%REINVENT SOUTH STOCKTON COALITION: $447k → 12%MINKWON CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION INC: $118k → 13%FILIPINO ADVOCATES FOR JUSTICE: $338k → 10%FILIPINO ADVOCATES FOR JUSTICE: $130k → 10%INDIGENOUS JUSTICE: $120k → 12%HAITIAN BRIDGE ALLIANCE: $200k → 11%PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS: $160k → 11%CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER CARECEN OF CALIFORNIA: $446k → 14%BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC: $2.5M → 17%TIDES FOUNDATION: $5.0M → 10%TIDES FOUNDATION: $3.5M → 10%TIDES FOUNDATION: $1.1M → 10%CHILD WELFARE INNOVATION INCORPORATED: $1.0M → 10%TIDES FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 10%TIDES FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 10%TIDES FOUNDATION: $566k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $296k → 10%TIDES FOUNDATION: $222k → 10%WILLAMETTE RIVER NETWORK: $130k → 10%EMERGENT WORKS INC: $1.3M → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $295k → 17%MUJERES UNIDAS Y ACTIVAS: $309k → 10%GARMENT WORKER CENTER: $466k → 14%GARMENT WORKER CENTER: $125k → 14%KOREAN RESOURCE CENTER INC: $150k → 14%YWCA OF GREATER BATON ROUGE: $445k → 19%YWCA GREATER BATON ROUGE: $150k → 19%FIRST FOCUS: $1.5M → 14%FIRST FOCUS ON CHILDREN: $810k → 14%FIRST FOCUS: $500k → 14%FIRST FOCUS ON CHILDREN: $500k → 14%SOUTHERN PARTNERS FUND INC: $143k → 13%FIRST FOCUS ON CHILDREN: $405k → 14%OPERATION RESTORATION: $406k → 23%SOUTHERN PARTNERS FUND INC: $125k → 13%WE THE PEOPLE OF DETROIT: $215k → 21%MASSACHUSETTS BAIL FUND INC: $880k → 8%CHILD WELFARE INNOVATION INCORPORATED: $300k → 16%DETENTION WATCH NETWORK: $431k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$295M · 535 repeat orgs$97M to everyone else

535 repeat relationships — 280 still active in FY2024, 255 since wound down; 169 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

535
831

Total granted

$295M
$85M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+23%

Still filing today

86%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCivil RightsHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    TIDES ADVOCACY
    4× · 2019–2024 · $35M · revenue +75%
  • CM
    CHRIST-CENTERED MINISTRIES
    2× · 2018–2019 · $13M · revenue +171% · 36% of their budget
  • AF
    ALLIANCE FOR SAFETY AND JUSTICE
    2× · 2021–2022 · $12M · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • CF
    Cooperatives for a Better World
    one grant, 2022 · $15M · revenue -90% · 94% of their budget
  • SC
    SHELTERWOOD COLLECTIVE
    one grant, 2023 · $9.6M · revenue -76% · 73% of their budget
  • I
    IFWHENHOWgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3.1M · revenue +28% · 36% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
3
Justice Funders

Serve as a partner, educator, and guide for philanthropy in reimagining practices that advance a thriving and just world.

—
4
The Alliance for Collective Action

The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…

Environment
5
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
6
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
7
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
8
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
9
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal
10
Chicago United for Equity

Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.

Civil Rights
11
Equal Justice Society

The Equal Justice Society (EJS) is transforming the nations consciousness on racethrough law, social science, and the arts. EJS works to dismantle structural andinstitutional racism to advance robust equal protection under the Fourteenth…

Civil Rights
12
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Families for Justice As Healing Inc and the most unlike its peers is John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyEnvironmental Conservation …Community Arts CentersImmigrant Worker SupportYouth Development CentersChristian Missionary Organi…Affordable Housing Developm…Dance Arts OrganizationsJewish Community Organizati…Youth Sports ProgramsYouth Development ServicesLocal History MuseumsDevelopmental Disabilities …Community Food PantriesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Ymca Youth DevelopmentIndependent K-12 SchoolsDomestic Violence ServicesSenior Support ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…School District FoundationsElementary Literacy TutoringUnited Way AffiliatesYouth Mentoring ProgramsLgbtq+ Community SupportChristian Youth CampsSchool Parent OrganizationsAddiction Recovery ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Local Food System Organizat…Cancer Support ServicesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community FoundationsFaith-Based Social ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Pregnancy Support ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Women & Girls Leadership De…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%6%<5yr14%18%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%6%<5yr14%34%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%3%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%35/1,547
the rest of the field
13%
240,363/1,818,018

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

1316 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1316 of the 1,573 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

122
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
321
Early backer (in before they grew)
1283/1316
Grantees still filing
770/1316
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TIDES FOUNDATION — $63,247,772 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDATIONCONNECT HUMANITY — $3,261,912 · PhilanthropyPrime Produce Limited — $2,765,000 · Philanthropy+13 more — $11,610,211 · Philanthropy+13 moreONETEN COALITION INC — $63,411,202 · Civil RightsONETEN COALITION INCIFWHENHOW — $3,121,256 · Civil Rights+20 more — $13,772,882 · Civil Rights+20 moreTIDES ADVOCACY — $34,619,059 · OtherTIDES ADVOCACY401 STATE STREET WBU LLC — $17,145,000 · Other401 STATE STREET WBU LLCSHELTERWOOD COLLECTIVE — $9,598,594 · OtherSHELTERWOOD COLLECTIVEAlliance for Global Justice Corp — $6,529,299 · OtherAlliance for Global Justice Corp+100 more — $54,161,723 · Other+100 moreCHRIST-CENTERED MINISTRIES — $12,647,348 · Human ServicesCHRIST-CEN…TIDES CENTER — $6,128,860 · Human ServicesTIDES CENT…First Focus on Children — $3,715,000 · Human ServicesFirst Focu…BLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC — $2,510,730 · Human ServicesBLUE MERID…Child Welfare Innovation Inc — $1,412,361 · Human Services+20 more — $11,129,523 · Human Services+20 moreWITNESS TO INNOCENCE — $16,140,627 · Crime & LegalWITNESS T…ALLIANCE FOR SAFETY AND JUSTICE — $12,447,789 · Crime & LegalALLIANCE …EMERGENCY RELEASE FUND — $1,724,500 · Crime & LegalEMERGENCY…+4 more — $1,273,612 · Crime & LegalCooperatives for a Better World — $14,630,616 · Arts & CultureTHE OPPORTUNITY AGENDA INC — $3,637,442 · Arts & CultureTHE BRONX DOCUMENTARY CENTER — $1,265,700 · Arts & Culture+11 more — $4,362,025 · Arts & CultureNational AIDS Memorial Inc — $7,355,438 · HealthTRANSFORMING RESEARCH INTO ACTION TO IMPROVE THE LIVES OF STUDENTS — $5,362,697 · HealthCHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION — $872,683 · HealthIMOGEN ROCHE FOUNDATION INC — $843,800 · HealthSAN FRANCISCO GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $685,751 · HealthEYELLIANCE INC — $609,032 · Health+6 more — $2,264,054 · Health
Philanthropy$80,884,895Civil Rights$80,305,340Other$122,053,675Human Services$37,543,822Crime & Legal$31,586,528Arts & Culture$23,895,783Health$17,993,455

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetONETEN COALITION INC — $63,411,202 over 2y, 45% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $63,247,772 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetTIDES ADVOCACY — $34,619,059 over 4y, 20% of budgetWITNESS TO INNOCENCE — $16,140,627 over 3y, 23% of budgetCooperatives for a Better World — $14,630,616 over 1y, 94% of budgetCHRIST-CENTERED MINISTRIES — $12,647,348 over 2y, 36% of budgetALLIANCE FOR SAFETY AND JUSTICE — $12,447,789 over 2y, 19% of budgetSHELTERWOOD COLLECTIVE — $9,598,594 over 1y, 73% of budgetNational AIDS Memorial Inc — $7,355,438 over 2y, 17% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp — $6,529,299 over 5y, 85% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $6,128,860 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetFirst Focus on Children — $3,715,000 over 5y, 49% of budgetTHE OPPORTUNITY AGENDA INC — $3,637,442 over 2y, 30% of budgetCONNECT HUMANITY — $3,261,912 over 2y, 35% of budgetIFWHENHOW — $3,121,256 over 1y, 36% of budgetPrime Produce Limited — $2,765,000 over 4y, 74% of budgetBLUE MERIDIAN PARTNERS INC — $2,510,730 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE CALIFORNIA ENDOWMENT — $2,386,369 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC — $1,926,454 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetPROJECT EVIDENT INC — $1,809,688 over 3y, 94% of budgetEMERGENCY RELEASE FUND — $1,724,500 over 2y, 45% of budgetWOMEN BUILDING UP INC — $1,607,737 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetHASER Inc — $1,479,114 over 5y, 37% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $1,441,721 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetChild Welfare Innovation Inc — $1,412,361 over 2y, 14% of budgetADVOCACY INSTITUTE INC — $1,348,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetDIRECT WOMEN — $1,345,878 over 1y, 77% of budgetINTERACTION THE AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR VOLUNTARY INT'L ACTION INC — $1,323,472 over 4y, 8.5% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $1,283,078 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetTHE BRONX DOCUMENTARY CENTER — $1,265,700 over 2y, 31% of budgetNorCal Resist — $1,254,220 over 5y, 36% of budgetEMERGENT WORKS INC — $1,250,000 over 1y, 53% of budgetPUBLIC RIGHTS PROJECT — $1,184,468 over 1y, 14% of budgetNATIONAL ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN WOMEN'S FORUM — $1,169,883 over 3y, 24% of budgetGATES FOUNDATION — $1,168,428 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAY YES BUFFALO SCHOLARSHIP INC — $1,135,900 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetLEADERSHIP COUNSEL FOR JUSTICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY — $1,121,372 over 3y, 19% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA — $1,006,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIERCE Advocates Families & Individuals Equitably Rooted in Collective Empowerme — $995,747 over 1y, 40% of budgetMassachusetts Bail Fund — $988,660 over 5y, 14% of budgetPILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN — $942,140 over 2y, 26% of budgetAKWESASNE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $932,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetBRONXNET PUBLIC MEDIA CORPORATION(FORMER BRONX COMMUNITY CABLE PROGRAMMING CORP ) — $927,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetCHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION — $872,683 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetMONUMENT IMPACT — $844,890 over 2y, 15% of budgetIMOGEN ROCHE FOUNDATION INC — $843,800 over 1y, 69% of budgetST LAWRENCE COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL — $827,550 over 2y, 88% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Proteus Fund IncActblue Charities IncNEO Philanthropy IncMovement Strategy Cen…The Heising-Simons Fo…Evelyn and Walter Haa…Solidago FoundationAmalgamated Charitabl…Borealis PhilanthropyGroundswell FundCalifornia Physicians…Common Counsel Founda…
Proteus Fund IncMA87× affinity131 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Proteus Fund Inc · Actblue Charities Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Movement Strategy Center · The Heising-Simons Foundation · Evelyn and Walter Haas Jr Fund · Solidago Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · Groundswell Fund · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Common Counsel Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tides Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Ironbound Community Corporation — 100% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
  • Fusion Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Anthropocene Alliance — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
67report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 1573 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines