Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Borealis Philanthropy

BOREALIS PHILANTHROPY directs resources to people building powerful, thriving communities that serve all of us, with those most impacted by injustice leading the way.

$40M
Granted FY2024still arriving
360
Grants FY2024still arriving
43
States reached
$1.3M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Civil Rights$68MPhilanthropy$31MArts & Culture$22MCrime & Legal$19MCommunity Improvement$17MHuman Services$14MHealth$11MEducation$8.6MOther$0
02FY2024 · 360 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 360 grants below total $37,308,475 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $40,129,865 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,821,390 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $125k
  • $10k–50k101 grants · $2.1M
  • $50k–250k217 grants · $26M
  • $250k+24 grants · $9.2M
$80,000
Median grant
43
States reached
$78M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS$1,283,000
SOCIAL GOOD FUND$988,000
HISPANICS IN PHILANTHROPY$558,000
HIGHLANDER RESEARCH AND EDUCATION CENTER$529,000
ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS$452,400
FUNDERS FOR LGBTQ ISSUES$329,000
TIDES CENTER$329,000
THE KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS SOCIETY$321,000
MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND$304,000
BEYOND THE BARS$300,000
SOLIDAIRE NETWORK$300,000
EQUITY IN THE CENTER$294,000
TRANSGENDER LAW CENTER$289,000
ASSOCIATION OF BLACK FOUNDATION EXECUTIVES$279,000
NATIVE AMERICANS IN PHILANTHROPY$279,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $24.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE CITY SCHOOL: $150k → 16%SILICON VALLEY DE-BUG: $165k → 8%TRANSLASH MEDIA: $150k → 17%MANO AMIGA: $365k → 10%AUSTIN JUSTICE COALITION: $150k → 10%NM COMUNIDADES EN ACCION Y DE FE: $173k → 23%SWOP BEHIND BARS INC: $158k → 13%TRANSGENDER ADVOCATES KNOWLEDGEABLE EMPOWERING: $265k → 16%THE KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS SOCIETY: $321k → 33%FREEDOM INC: $490k → 10%HMONG AMERICAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION: $220k → 17%IMAGINE BLACK FUTURES: $200k → 8%JUNTOS: $150k → 22%HAITIAN BRIDGE ALLIANCE: $200k → 11%EL CENTRO DE IGUALDAD Y DERECHOS: $173k → 14%FREEDOM INC: $155k → 10%SISTERS PGH: $208k → 11%PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS: $150k → 11%MANO AMIGA: $165k → 10%AUSTIN JUSTICE COALITION: $240k → 10%FREEDOM INC: $150k → 10%BARRED BUSINESS FOUNDATION: $230k → 14%JUVENILE JUSTICE COALITION: $150k → 15%SISTERS PGH: $174k → 11%FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNESS: $300k → 16%UNTIL WE ARE ALL FREE MOVEMENT: $150k → 11%FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNESS: $279k → 16%DOMESTIC WORKERS UNITED: $200k → 20%FREEDOM INC: $500k → 10%FREEDOM INC: $250k → 10%FREEDOM INC: $166k → 10%OPERATION RESTORATION: $312k → 23%DOCUMENTED: $250k → 17%OPERATION RESTORATION: $250k → 23%TRANSLASH MEDIA: $270k → 20%TRANSLASH MEDIA: $150k → 20%COLEMAN ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN & YOUTH: $150k → 10%TGI JUSTICE PROJECT: $260k → 10%TGI JUSTICE PROJECT: $200k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $1.9M → 10%TIDES CENTER: $1.2M → 10%YA-YA NETWORK: $150k → 17%TIDES CENTER: $470k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $325k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $300k → 10%ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT: $250k → 17%CENTRAL AMERICAN MARTYRS CENTER: $200k → 14%SPM DISABILITY JUSTICE FUND: $185k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
VT
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of Borealis Philanthropy’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Borealis Philanthropylessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$173M · 459 repeat orgs$25M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

459 repeat relationships — 243 still active in FY2024, 216 since wound down; 111 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

459
350

Total granted

$173M
$18M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+16%

Still filing today

87%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsHuman ServicesCrime & LegalArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $6.2M · revenue +490%
  • Asian AmericansPacific Islanders in Philanthropy Inc
    6× · 2018–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +24% · 63% of their budget
  • HIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2.9M · revenue +132%

Funded once

  • GU
    GuideStar USA Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $300k · revenue -91%
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $265k · revenue +174%
  • AS
    ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
National Legal Advocacy Network Dba Glow

The National Legal Advocacy Network d/b/a Grassroots Law & Organizing for Workers is a legal non-profit organization dedicated to using legal strategies as a tool to build power for marginalized workers and create systemic change through…

Crime & Legal
3
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
4
Equal Justice Center

The Equal Justice Center is a non-profit law firm and employment justice organization which empowers low-income families, workers, and communities to achieve fair treatment in the workplace, in the justice system, and in our shared society…

Civil Rights
5
Queer Power Alliance

Queer Power Alliance is rooted in the LGBTQIA+ community and in solidarity with other marginalized communities. We strive for equity by disrupting systems of oppression holding back LGBTQIA+ communities through advocating, educating,…

Human Services
6
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
7
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
8
Alliance to Mobilize Our Resistance

AMOR is an alliance of community based grassroots organizations mobilizing at the intersections of race, class, gender, sexual orientation, and immigration status to prevent, to respond to, and to end state violence against our community.

Human Services
9
Civil Liberties Defense Center

CIVIL LIBERTIES DEFENSE CENTER (CLDC) educates the general public about their rights and privileges under the US Constitution and provides free legal support to climate and social justice activists.

Civil Rights
10
Fair Work Center

We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…

Employment
11
National Latina Institute for Reproductive Justice

We demand health, dignity, and justice for our communities. We center and amplify Latine voices as we work to transform oppressive systems and narratives and to reclaim control over our bodies and lives. We build power by organizing our…

Health
12
The International Institute On Race Equality and Human Rights

The international institute on race, equality and human rights contributes to the promotion and defense of human rights, through training, technical assistance, advocacy, and strategic litigation conducted at the regional and international…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voices of Community Activists & Leaders (Vocal-Ny) Inc and the most unlike its peers is Voice News Network. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLgbtq+ Community SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…Environmental Conservation …Affordable Housing Developm…Health Access Advocacy and …Developmental Disabilities …Faith-Based Social ServicesCommunity Arts CentersChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Dance Arts OrganizationsCommunity FoundationsYouth Mentoring ProgramsCommunity Food PantriesIndependent K-12 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community College Foundatio…Senior Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsPregnancy Support ServicesLocal Food System Organizat…Youth Development ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Domestic Violence ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyImmigrant Worker Support
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 13 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%11%<5yr14%27%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%5%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%5%<5yr14%21%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%6%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
40/936
the rest of the field
13%
240,356/1,818,629

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

824 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 824 of the 937 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

131
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
264
Early backer (in before they grew)
791/824
Grantees still filing
502/824
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ASSOCIATION OF BLACK FOUNDATION EXECUTIVES INC — $2,804,000 · OtherNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR RESPONSIVE PHILANTHROPY — $2,479,000 · OtherTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC — $2,852,000 · Other+93 more — $52,502,337 · Other+93 moreFUNDERS FOR LESBIAN AND GAY ISSUES INC DBA FUNDERS FOR LGBTQ ISSUES — $1,589,000 · Civil RightsFUNDERS FOR LES…Transgender Law Center — $1,386,700 · Civil RightsTransgender Law…Native Americans in Philanthropy — $1,364,000 · Civil RightsNative American…MALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND — $1,275,200 · Civil RightsMALDEF - MEXICA…EQUITY IN THE CENTER — $1,129,000 · Civil RightsEQUITY IN THE C…SOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC — $1,061,500 · Civil RightsNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER — $1,005,000 · Civil RightsBYP100 Education Fund — $980,000 · Civil RightsSPARK REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE NOW — $962,845 · Civil RightsChinese for Affirmative Action — $715,060 · Civil Rights+22 more — $9,262,858 · Civil Rights+22 moreTIDES CENTER — $4,831,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTERFREEDOM INC — $1,955,900 · Human ServicesFREEDOM INCTHE KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS SOCIETY INC — $879,100 · Human ServicesBOLD FUTURES NM — $821,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION RESTORATION — $783,000 · Human ServicesDocumented LTD — $750,000 · Human ServicesTransgender Advocates Knowledgeable Empowering — $688,800 · Human ServicesFUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNES — $629,000 · Human Services+14 more — $6,216,275 · Human Services+14 moreAsian AmericansPacific Islanders in Philanthropy Inc — $3,019,000 · PhilanthropyAsian Ameri…TIDES FOUNDATION — $2,335,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUND…UNITED PHILANTHROPY FORUM — $1,870,600 · PhilanthropyUNITED PHIL…GRANTMAKERS FOR EFFECTIVE ORGANIZATIONS — $1,301,500 · PhilanthropyGRANTMAKERS…CFLEADS — $1,114,000 · PhilanthropyCFLEADSASSOCIATION OF SMALL FOUNDATIONS — $1,029,000 · PhilanthropyASSOCIATION…PEAK GRANTMAKING INC — $1,011,500 · PhilanthropyPEAK GRANTM…CANDID — $894,000 · PhilanthropyCANDID+6 more — $2,571,000 · Philanthropy+6 moreNonprofit Information Networking Association — $1,644,000 · Arts & CultureNonprofit I…BOARDSOURCE — $1,423,500 · Arts & CultureBOARDSOURCEALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC — $1,299,600 · Arts & CultureALLIED MEDI…THE LEGACY ARTS PROJECT INC — $1,133,920 · Arts & CultureTHE LEGACY …DANCERS GROUP — $877,000 · Arts & CultureDANCERS GRO…MIJENTE SUPPORT COMMITTEE — $654,200 · Arts & CultureINDIJ PUBLIC MEDIA — $650,000 · Arts & CultureACCION LATINA — $620,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTH SEATTLE EMERALD — $600,000 · Arts & CultureVISIONARIES OF THE CREATIVE ARTS — $547,500 · Arts & CultureAlternate RootsInc — $535,000 · Arts & CultureSOUND THEATRE COMPANY — $510,000 · Arts & Culture+10 more — $3,814,500 · Arts & Culture+10 moreSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $6,194,160 · EnvironmentHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $2,904,000 · EnvironmentCenter for Diversity and the Environment — $472,000 · EnvironmentSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $3,580,285 · EducationWomens Funding Network — $829,000 · EducationBLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA — $805,000 · EducationSahan Journal — $705,000 · EducationINDIGENOUS MEDIA FREEDOM ALLIANCE — $650,000 · EducationEVERYBLACKGIRL INC — $646,500 · EducationScalawag — $450,000 · EducationDISABILITY LEAD — $430,000 · EducationCOMMUNICATION FIRST — $345,000 · EducationFREE ALAS — $340,000 · EducationTHE RUCKUS SOCIETY — $305,000 · Education
Other$60,637,337Civil Rights$20,731,163Human Services$17,554,075Philanthropy$15,145,600Arts & Culture$14,309,220Environment$9,570,160Education$9,085,785

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $6,194,160 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $4,831,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $3,580,285 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetAsian AmericansPacific Islanders in Philanthropy Inc — $3,019,000 over 6y, 63% of budgetHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $2,904,000 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC — $2,852,000 over 8y, 8.8% of budgetASSOCIATION OF BLACK FOUNDATION EXECUTIVES INC — $2,804,000 over 6y, 45% of budgetNATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR RESPONSIVE PHILANTHROPY — $2,479,000 over 6y, 48% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $2,335,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFREEDOM INC — $1,955,900 over 8y, 6.4% of budgetHISPANICS IN PHILANTHROPY — $1,918,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetUNITED PHILANTHROPY FORUM — $1,870,600 over 6y, 30% of budgetNonprofit Information Networking Association — $1,644,000 over 6y, 28% of budgetFUNDERS FOR LESBIAN AND GAY ISSUES INC DBA FUNDERS FOR LGBTQ ISSUES — $1,589,000 over 6y, 23% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc — $1,489,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetBOARDSOURCE — $1,423,500 over 6y, 9.2% of budgetTransgender Law Center — $1,386,700 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetNative Americans in Philanthropy — $1,364,000 over 6y, 43% of budgetWomen With A Vision — $1,326,000 over 8y, 11% of budgetPROVIDENCE YOUTH STUDENT MOVEMENT — $1,317,000 over 8y, 40% of budgetGRANTMAKERS FOR EFFECTIVE ORGANIZATIONS — $1,301,500 over 6y, 9.8% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC — $1,299,600 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetMALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND — $1,275,200 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetTHE LEGACY ARTS PROJECT INC — $1,133,920 over 4y, 59% of budgetEQUITY IN THE CENTER — $1,129,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetCFLEADS — $1,114,000 over 5y, 39% of budgetPoder in Action — $1,075,000 over 7y, 12% of budgetSOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC — $1,061,500 over 7y, 7.6% of budgetAlliance for Global Justice Corp — $1,035,700 over 8y, 6.6% of budgetASSOCIATION OF SMALL FOUNDATIONS — $1,029,000 over 6y, 9.9% of budgetPEAK GRANTMAKING INC — $1,011,500 over 6y, 14% of budgetSOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE — $1,009,000 over 8y, 11% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER — $1,005,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetBYP100 Education Fund — $980,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetAUTISTIC WOMEN AND NONBINARY NETWORK — $965,000 over 5y, 36% of budgetSPARK REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE NOW — $962,845 over 8y, 14% of budgetCANDID — $894,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $889,300 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS SOCIETY INC — $879,100 over 8y, 40% of budgetDANCERS GROUP — $877,000 over 5y, 8.1% of budgetPROJECT SOUTH INC — $855,000 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetWomens Funding Network — $829,000 over 5y, 8.6% of budgetBOLD FUTURES NM — $821,000 over 8y, 13% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICE CARE INC — $820,000 over 4y, 31% of budgetKHMER GIRLS IN ACTION — $812,000 over 8y, 9.9% of budgetCHAINLESS CHANGE INC — $807,000 over 5y, 82% of budgetBLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA — $805,000 over 5y, 9.9% of budgetHELPING EDUCATE TO ADVANCE THE RIGHTS OF THE DEAF — $793,500 over 5y, 70% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Asian AmericansPacific Islanders in Philanthropy Inc ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PRAXIS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF BLACK FOUNDATION EXECUTIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR RESPONSIVE PHILANTHROPY ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM INC ↗
  • Who funds HISPANICS IN PHILANTHROPY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED PHILANTHROPY FORUM ↗
  • Who funds Nonprofit Information Networking Association ↗
  • Who funds FUNDERS FOR LESBIAN AND GAY ISSUES INC DBA FUNDERS FOR LGBTQ ISSUES ↗
  • Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOARDSOURCE ↗
  • Who funds Transgender Law Center ↗
  • Who funds Native Americans in Philanthropy ↗
  • Who funds Women With A Vision ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE YOUTH STUDENT MOVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds GRANTMAKERS FOR EFFECTIVE ORGANIZATIONS ↗
  • Who funds ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE LEGACY ARTS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUITY IN THE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CFLEADS ↗
  • Who funds Poder in Action ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Alliance for Global Justice Corp ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF SMALL FOUNDATIONS ↗
  • Who funds PEAK GRANTMAKING INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN VISION ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BYP100 Education Fund ↗
  • Who funds AUTISTIC WOMEN AND NONBINARY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds SPARK REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE NOW ↗
  • Who funds CANDID ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds THE KNIGHTS & ORCHIDS SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds DANCERS GROUP ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Groundswell FundProteus Fund IncNEO Philanthropy IncSolidaire Network IncAmalgamated Charitabl…Ms Foundation for Wom…The Astraea Foundatio…Common Counsel Founda…Wellspring Philanthro…Solidago FoundationMarguerite Casey Foun…Fwdus Education Fund …
Groundswell FundCA166.7× affinity128 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Groundswell Fund · Proteus Fund Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Solidaire Network Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Ms Foundation for Women Inc · The Astraea Foundation Inc · Common Counsel Foundation · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Solidago Foundation · Marguerite Casey Foundation · Fwdus Education Fund Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Borealis Philanthropy funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 150%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Baltimore Safe Haven Corp — 28% of income from government
  • Center for Intercultural Organizing — 28% of income from government
  • Justice for Housing Inc — 22% of income from government
  • Community Service Care Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Chainless Change Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Cfleads — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
15get no government money at all
45report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 937 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home