Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Evelyn and Walter Haas Jr Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$25M
Granted FY2024still arriving
180
Grants FY2024still arriving
13
States reached
$3.3M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Civil Rights$54MEducation$37MPhilanthropy$35MRecreation & Sports$14MFood & Nutrition$9.3MCommunity Improvement$9.2MPublic Benefit$8.9MHuman Services$4.7MOther$0
02FY2024 · 180 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k48 grants · $138k
  • $10k–50k46 grants · $953k
  • $50k–250k68 grants · $8.8M
  • $250k+18 grants · $15M
$34,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$484M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TIDES CENTER$3,312,500
GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY$2,179,400
POSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE$1,607,500
CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND$1,524,500
NEO PHILANTHROPY INC$750,000
FOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES$690,000
CALIFORNIA CALLS EDUCATION FUND$650,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION$640,750
SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION$420,000
COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC$418,525
COMPLETE COLLEGE AMERICA INC$345,000
PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS$320,000
COMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND$305,000
Individual grant recipient$300,000
NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER$300,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $22.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ALIENTO EDUCATION FUND: $115k → 11%PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS: $320k → 11%DEFINE AMERICAN: $117k → 14%DEFINE AMERICAN: $100k → 15%PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS: $157k → 11%DEFINE AMERICAN: $114k → 14%DEFINE AMERICAN: $100k → 15%HAITIAN BRIDGE ALLIANCE: $207k → 10%PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS: $125k → 11%DEFINE AMERICAN: $100k → 15%HAITIAN BRIDGE ALLIANCE: $75k → 10%PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS: $100k → 11%DEFINE AMERICAN: $100k → 14%SERVICES IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND EDUCATION NETWORK: $92k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $100k → 11%SERVICES IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND EDUCATION NETWORK: $85k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $100k → 11%SERVICES IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND EDUCATION NETWORK: $85k → 8%SERVICES IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND EDUCATION NETWORK: $85k → 8%SERVICES IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND EDUCATION NETWORK: $85k → 8%SERVICES IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND EDUCATION NETWORK: $85k → 8%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $82k → 14%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $75k → 14%YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $75k → 14%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $530k → 10%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $500k → 10%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $150k → 10%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $135k → 10%ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT INC: $145k → 17%ASYLUM SEEKER ADVOCACY PROJECT: $107k → 17%COLEMAN CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES: $100k → 10%COLEMAN CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES: $100k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $3.3M → 10%TIDES CENTER: $2.0M → 10%TIDES CENTER: $1.6M → 10%TIDES CENTER: $1.6M → 10%TIDES CENTER: $1.2M → 10%TIDES CENTER: $1.2M → 10%TIDES CENTER: $1.2M → 10%TIDES CENTER: $1.1M → 10%TIDES CENTER: $600k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $575k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $300k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $200k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $200k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $125k → 10%DEFINE AMERICAN: $100k → 14%DEFINE AMERICAN: $100k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
HI
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of Evelyn and Walter Haas Jr Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Evelyn and Walter Haas Jr Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$152M · 296 repeat orgs$7.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

296 repeat relationships — 122 still active in FY2024, 174 since wound down; 40 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

296
181

Total granted

$152M
$5.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+29%

Still filing today

85%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCivil RightsHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $14M · revenue +189%
  • CS
    CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND
    8× · 2017–2024 · $8.4M · revenue +96%
  • PC
    POSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $4.9M · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • CC
    COMMUNITY CHANGE
    one grant, 2023 · $207k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $200k
  • PI
    PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS
    one grant, 2017 · $165k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
2
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
3
American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California

The american civil liberties union of northern california (aclu nc union) defends and advances the principles of freedom, equality and justice contained in the united states constitution. aclu nc union, a california mutual benefit…

—
4
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
5
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
6
Public Advocates Inc

For more than five decades, public advocates has challenged the systemic causes of poverty and racial discrimination by strengthening community voices in public policy and achieving tangible legal victories advancing education, housing,…

—
7
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
8
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
9
First Amendment Coalition

The first amendment coalition protects and promotes a free press, freedom of expression and the people's right to know. continued on schedule o.

—
10
The Bar Association of San Francisco

The bar association of san francisco champions equal access to justice and promotes humanity, excellence, and diversity in the legal profession. we provide legal services to disadvantaged and underserved individuals in san francisco. we…

—
11
Unitedly

Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Human Services
12
Sf Partnership

SF Partnership is an organization comprised of SF's leading employers dedicated to supporting an equitable, resilient, and vibrant economy shared by all people working and living in San Francisco. Through education, advocacy, and research,…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Policylink and the most unlike its peers is Cares Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports ProgramsEnvironmental Conservation …Community FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…Immigrant Worker SupportChristian Missionary Organi…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Women & Girls Leadership De…Youth Development ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Independent K-12 SchoolsLocal History MuseumsCommunity FoundationsCancer Support ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Animal Rescue and ShelterDevelopmental Disabilities …School District FoundationsSchool Parent OrganizationsJewish Community Organizati…Military Veterans SupportOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community Food PantriesSenior Support ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesHealth Access Advocacy and …Policy Research and AdvocacyFood Banks and PantriesAffordable Housing Developm…Lgbtq+ Community Support
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%3%<5yr15%7%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr17%32%20–35yr11%26%35–55yr13%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%1%<5yr15%6%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr17%42%20–35yr11%25%35–55yr13%14%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%7/464
the rest of the field
14%
26,001/186,514

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

440 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 440 of the 556 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

10
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
105
Early backer (in before they grew)
425/440
Grantees still filing
311/440
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $13,514,550 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CALIFOR…POSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE — $4,927,000 · EducationPOSITIVE COACHING ALL…SPARK SF PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $3,717,500 · EducationSPARK SF PUBLIC SCHOO…CAMPAIGN FOR COLLEGE OPPORTUNITY — $1,573,500 · Education+26 more — $10,866,679 · Education+26 moreCALIFORNIA CALLS EDUCATION FUND — $3,008,500 · Civil RightsCALIFORNIA CALLS ED…CALIFORNIA IMMIGRANT POLICY CENTER — $2,548,000 · Civil RightsCALIFORNIA IMMIGRAN…MALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND — $2,329,500 · Civil RightsMALDEF - MEXICAN AM…UNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC — $1,857,000 · Civil RightsUNITED WE DREAM NET…MOVEMENT ADVANCEMENT PROJECT — $1,742,000 · Civil RightsMOVEMENT ADVANCEMEN…EQUALITY FEDERATION INSTITUTE — $1,675,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK — $1,477,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER — $1,383,000 · Civil RightsThe Pride Foundation — $1,193,000 · Civil RightsCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS — $1,124,500 · Civil Rights+26 more — $13,119,600 · Civil Rights+26 moreCOACHING CORPS — $6,336,410 · OtherCOACHING CORPSFREEDOM FOR ALL AMERICANS EDUCATION FUND — $4,133,000 · OtherFREEDOM FOR ALL AMERICANS EDUCATIO…NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE — $2,119,400 · OtherNEO Philanthropy Inc — $4,138,000 · OtherNEO Philanthropy Inc+87 more — $38,246,150 · Other+87 moreTIDES CENTER — $15,409,382 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTERIMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER — $1,323,500 · Human ServicesIMMIGRANT LEG…DEFINE AMERICAN INC — $979,500 · Human ServicesPARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS — $752,000 · Human Services+11 more — $3,374,500 · Human Services+11 moreCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $4,283,900 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY IN…THE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $3,632,562 · PhilanthropyTHE SAN FRAN…GRANTMAKERS CONCERNED WITH IMMIGRANTS AND REFUGEES — $1,936,900 · PhilanthropyGRANTMAKERS …Silicon Valley Community Foundation — $1,738,000 · PhilanthropySilicon Vall…TIDES FOUNDATION — $1,400,000 · PhilanthropyTIDES FOUNDA…ASIAN AMERICAN FUTURES — $1,261,500 · PhilanthropyASIAN AMERIC…Rockwood Leadership Institute — $855,000 · PhilanthropyInland Empire Community Foundation — $775,000 · Philanthropy+14 more — $3,540,188 · Philanthropy+14 moreGOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY — $7,868,525 · EnvironmentAsian Pacific Environmental Network — $715,000 · Environment+3 more — $400,334 · EnvironmentCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND — $8,417,483 · Food & Nutrition
Education$34,599,229Civil Rights$31,457,100Other$54,972,960Human Services$21,838,882Philanthropy$19,423,050Environment$8,983,859Food & Nutrition$8,417,483

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTIDES CENTER — $15,409,382 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $13,514,550 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND — $8,417,483 over 8y, 12% of budgetGOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY — $7,868,525 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetCOACHING CORPS — $6,336,410 over 5y, 36% of budgetPOSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE — $4,927,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $4,283,900 over 8y, 6.2% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc — $4,138,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetFREEDOM FOR ALL AMERICANS EDUCATION FUND — $4,133,000 over 6y, 39% of budgetSPARK SF PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $3,717,500 over 6y, 9.3% of budgetTHE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $3,632,562 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCALIFORNIA CALLS EDUCATION FUND — $3,008,500 over 8y, 7.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA IMMIGRANT POLICY CENTER — $2,548,000 over 7y, 18% of budgetMALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND — $2,329,500 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetNATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE — $2,119,400 over 7y, 7.3% of budgetGRANTMAKERS CONCERNED WITH IMMIGRANTS AND REFUGEES — $1,936,900 over 8y, 16% of budgetUNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC — $1,857,000 over 6y, 5.5% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR LGBTQ RIGHTS FKA NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS — $1,755,375 over 7y, 6.9% of budgetMOVEMENT ADVANCEMENT PROJECT — $1,742,000 over 7y, 17% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation — $1,738,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEQUALITY FEDERATION INSTITUTE — $1,675,000 over 7y, 23% of budgetCAMPAIGN FOR COLLEGE OPPORTUNITY — $1,573,500 over 7y, 24% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE — $1,560,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetNATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK — $1,477,000 over 7y, 7.3% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $1,400,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER — $1,383,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION FORUM — $1,357,000 over 7y, 5.1% of budgetIMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER — $1,323,500 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN FUTURES — $1,261,500 over 4y, 25% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $1,214,000 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetThe Pride Foundation — $1,193,000 over 6y, 6.0% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND — $1,166,500 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetHorizons Foundation — $1,144,525 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetCHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION — $1,142,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS — $1,124,500 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetThe Education Trust Inc — $1,107,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetCENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICS EDUCATION FUND — $1,039,000 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetPOWER CALIFORNIA — $1,037,250 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $1,007,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetDEFINE AMERICAN INC — $979,500 over 8y, 8.3% of budgetFAITH IN PUBLIC LIFE INC — $972,000 over 7y, 7.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $966,059 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC RELIGION RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $907,000 over 7y, 7.2% of budgetRockwood Leadership Institute — $855,000 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetPROTEUS FUND INC — $845,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetThe Institute for College Access & Success — $842,000 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES — $821,470 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetADVOCATES FOR TRANS EQUALITY EDUCATION FUND — $797,000 over 7y, 7.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds COACHING CORPS ↗
  • Who funds POSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY INITIATIVES ↗
  • Who funds NEO Philanthropy Inc ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM FOR ALL AMERICANS EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds SPARK SF PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA CALLS EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA IMMIGRANT POLICY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL LGBTQ TASK FORCE ↗
  • Who funds GRANTMAKERS CONCERNED WITH IMMIGRANTS AND REFUGEES ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR LGBTQ RIGHTS FKA NATIONAL CENTER FOR LESBIAN RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds MOVEMENT ADVANCEMENT PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Silicon Valley Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds EQUALITY FEDERATION INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CAMPAIGN FOR COLLEGE OPPORTUNITY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY CHANGE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION FORUM ↗
  • Who funds IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN FUTURES ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds The Pride Foundation ↗
  • Who funds COMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds Horizons Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds The Education Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICS EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds POWER CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DEFINE AMERICAN INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The James Irvine Foun…The California Wellne…The California Endowm…The San Francisco Fou…The David and Lucile …Crankstart FoundationEast Bay Community Fo…Tides CenterThe Heising-Simons Fo…The William & Flora H…California Physicians…Stupski Foundation
The James Irvine FoundationCA119.5× affinity95 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The James Irvine Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · The California Endowment · The San Francisco Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Crankstart Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Tides Center · The Heising-Simons Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · Stupski Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Evelyn and Walter Haas Jr Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Centerlink Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
  • Uaspire Inc — 1% of income from government
  • The Center for Effective Philanthropy Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Glbtq Legal Advocates & Defenders Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
49report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Evelyn and Walter Haas Jr Fund?

Find your warmest path to Evelyn and Walter Haas Jr Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 556 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home