· Public charity
NEO Philanthropy Inc
Neo philanthropy, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k76 grants · $429k
- $10k–50k174 grants · $3.8M
- $50k–250k213 grants · $25M
- $250k+95 grants · $75M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Breakthrough Energy Foundation | $23,580,000 |
| Asian American Advancing Justice - AAJCInc | $3,675,000 |
| National Black Worker Center Inc | $2,598,740 |
| Ford Foundation | $2,123,725 |
| One Arizona | $1,780,000 |
| Blueprint North Carolina | $1,100,000 |
| Tides Center | $1,078,250 |
| Alliance For Youth Organizing | $1,050,000 |
| Oficina Legal Del Pueblo Unido Inc | $1,050,000 |
| Center For Civic Policy | $1,005,000 |
| Mississippi Engaged | $1,000,000 |
| State Power Fund | $953,500 |
| Rewriting The Code Inc | $945,000 |
| The Power Coalition for Equity and Justice | $940,000 |
| Tides Foundation | $840,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $49.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
558 repeat relationships — 292 still active in FY2024, 266 since wound down; 253 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AAASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC8× · 2017–2024 · $9.9M · revenue +356% · 37% of their budget
ONE ARIZONA8× · 2017–2024 · $8.0M · revenue +416%- SVSTATE VOICES8× · 2017–2024 · $7.9M · revenue +57%
Funded once
- CICOLORSTACK INCone grant, 2023 · $1.2M · revenue -8% · 55% of their budget
- SCSpelman Collegeone grant, 2022 · $1.1M · revenue -15%
- AAI4ALLone grant, 2021 · $862k · revenue -2% · 28% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…
Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…
Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…
The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.
The american civil liberties union of northern california (aclu nc union) defends and advances the principles of freedom, equality and justice contained in the united states constitution. aclu nc union, a california mutual benefit…
Advance democracy, equity, and self-determination in U.S. territories through participatory advocacy, narrative and cultural change, and ecosystem building.
Bold Impact is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting a democracy where all communities get to thrive.
To support the work of the amercian civil liberties union of louisiana through litigation, public education and limited lobbying in support of civil liberties.
The Equal Justice Society (EJS) is transforming the nations consciousness on racethrough law, social science, and the arts. EJS works to dismantle structural andinstitutional racism to advance robust equal protection under the Fourteenth…
Columbia legal services advocates for laws that advance social, economic, and racial equity for people living in poverty. our work is to end exclusionary policies that have invested in walls and bars rather than investing in people and…
The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Voices of Community Activists & Leaders (Vocal-Ny) Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Jacob and Valeria Langeloth Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
1162 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1162 of the 1,303 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Breakthrough Energy Foundation ↗
- Who funds MALDEF - MEXICAN AMERICAN LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC ↗
- Who funds ONE ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds STATE VOICES ↗
- Who funds PROGEORGIA STATE TABLE INC ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FORD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PENNSYLVANIA VOICE ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Markup News Inc ↗
- Who funds BLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA ↗
- Who funds UNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ORGANIZING ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY ALLIANCE OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds COMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CIVIC POLICY ↗
- Who funds Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law ↗
- Who funds National Coalition on Black Civic Partic ↗
- Who funds NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIA NEW MAJORITY EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds Detention Watch Network ↗
- Who funds NEW GEORGIA PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CASA INC ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE OHIO ORGANIZING COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL BLACK WORKER CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
- Who funds FUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICANS FOR CONTRACEPTION ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN COALITION FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds OFICINA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO UNIDO INC ↗
- Who funds Florida Immigrant Coalition Inc ↗
- Who funds Virginia Civic Engagement Table ↗
- Who funds ReThink Media ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL KOREAN AMERICAN SERVICE AND EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC ↗
- Who funds COLORADO IMMIGRANT RIGHTS COALITION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Borealis Philanthropy · Proteus Fund Inc · Solidago Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Groundswell Fund · Marguerite Casey Foundation · State Voices · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Way to Rise · Windward Fund · New Venture Fund · Ms Foundation for Women Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization NEO Philanthropy Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition Inc — 8% of income from government
- Casa Inc — 8% of income from government
- Hope Community Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.