· Public charity
Actblue Charities Inc
Actblue charities' mission is to democratize charitable giving by facilitating grassroots online fundraising to eligible 501(c)(3) charitable organizations.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $57,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $64,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $6,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| POWER RISING | $50,000 |
| STATE VOICES | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
Colorofchange.org works to strengthen the voice of black americans and increase the level of accountability and responsiveness of elected officials to underrepresented black constituencies using the internet as a lobbying and…
Detention Watch Network seeks to end the cruel system of immigration detention via programs of grassroots organizing, strategic communications, and collective advocacy.
Serve as a partner, educator, and guide for philanthropy in reimagining practices that advance a thriving and just world.
The Equal Justice Society (EJS) is transforming the nations consciousness on racethrough law, social science, and the arts. EJS works to dismantle structural andinstitutional racism to advance robust equal protection under the Fourteenth…
The Black Organizing Project is a Black, member-led community organization working for racial, social, and economic justice through grassroots organizing and community building across the Bay Area.
Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…
Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.
Help formerly incarcerated people who are disproportionately affected by the US legal system.
The promise of justice initiative works to create positive change for people in the criminal legal system at the intersection of impact litigation, direct services and community engagement.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naacp Empowerment Programs Inc and the most unlike its peers is Building Audacity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 14. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
95 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 95 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BLACK LIVES MATTER GLOBAL NETWORK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TAKEACTION MN EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds NAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds Alliance for Global Justice Corp ↗
- Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Civic Nation ↗
- Who funds POWER RISING ↗
- Who funds COLOR OF CHANGEORG EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA FREEDOM FUND ↗
- Who funds PROGRESSIVE LEADERSHIP ALLIANCE OF NEVADA ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO COMMUNITY BOND FUND ↗
- Who funds Unicorn Riot ↗
- Who funds WE THE PROTESTERS INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL POLICE ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds CATALYST CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds UNIDOSUS ↗
- Who funds THE BAIL PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Kaleidoscope Community Organization ↗
- Who funds THE MARSHALL PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE PRAXIS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds BLACK AND PINK INC ↗
- Who funds Massachusetts Bail Fund ↗
- Who funds Freedom Fund Network Inc ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN COMMUNITY BAIL FUND INC ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA BAIL FUND INC ↗
- Who funds RESTORING JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds Northwest Community Bail Fund ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE YOUTH STUDENT MOVEMENT ↗
- Who funds ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MOVEMENT ALLIANCE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY BONDS INC ↗
- Who funds NorCal Resist ↗
- Who funds BUSINESS COALITION FOR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds NASHVILLE COMMUNITY BAIL FUND ↗
- Who funds UNION THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY ↗
- Who funds FAITH IN TEXAS - PICO ↗
- Who funds FUSION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Tides Center · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · Entertainment Industry Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Common Counsel Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Proteus Fund Inc · Tides Foundation · New Venture Fund · Robert F Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights · The Yelp Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Actblue Charities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Building Audacity — 24% of income from government
- Tulsa Community Foundation — 11% of income from government
- Fusion Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.