Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

MONUMENT IMPACT

MONUMENT IMPACT (California) receives grants from 51 organizations whose IRS filings report $13,839,868 to it, the largest being THE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ($2,363,500). 31 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 70% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$4.3M
Funders on record
51
Grants received
$14M
Net assets
$4.0M
31/51 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 77%
01What it does

What Monument Impact does

Mission

Our mission is to serve as an advocate and resource in contra costa county that guides, educates, and connects low-income communities.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Community engagement programs help local residents build their leadership capacity for engaging key issues such as immigrant rights and housing justice that impact their families and improving the community. Community engagement program have served and outreach 3027 residents in the immigrant community through tenants legal clinics, community organizing, housing justice forums, and tenants rights resources. Social media reached over 45,000 people. Mi was able to serve 72 day labor members, 32 of the members obtained fulltime permanent jobs and facilitating a total 13,266 daily job placements.

    $1,198,356 spent
    38% of program spending
  2. Elevate concord - in partnership with the city of concord, Monument Impact (mi) received $1.5m in arpa funding to support elevate concord, a two-year program. Mi also received other funding from partners, the latino community foundation, y&h soda, and community financial resources. The program stabilized 120 families by providing $500 for 12 months + $2500 at the start. Mi partnered with uptogether to help randomly select the families based on specific criteria to ensure fairness and transparency and process the monthly payments. The required program criteria were as follows: single parents who are concord residents have at least one child under 12 years old earns $55,000 or less annually we are working with dr. Rosa maria sternberg on a two (2) year evaluation, which includes both qualitative and quantitative data collection, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the program's effectiveness. The surveys are sent quarterly, and families receive $35 for their responses.

    $894,870 spent
    28% of program spending
  3. Asset building programs - our program empowers individuals to achieve economic self-sufficiency through skill-building, confidence, and personalized support. We served 276 community members to gain job-ready skills, from beginner to advanced levels. Classes are offered in spanish, farsi, and english, with advanced sessions including professional development and mock interviews. We supported 28 new businesses, awarded 15 mini-grants ($1,000$1,200), and issued 14 business loans ($2,500$5,000). 44 clients received employment readiness support. 35 secured jobs through job search and placement services.

    $510,154 spent
    16% of program spending
  4. Healthy communities programs promote mental health, physical activity, diabetes management, and access to health care. Mi served a total of 293 in healthy community program and outreach/campaign 21,105 community members. Social media reached 12,069 people. Healthy communities program had 19 active health promoters.

    $316,401 spent
    10% of program spending
  5. Rental and recovery fund in 2020 the emergency relief & recovery fund was established to respond to covid-19 pandemic and its impact on low income immigrants and their families experiencing job loss. In 2022 Monument Impact distributed a total of $25,196 in rental assistance and direct aid to 19 people.

    $223,652 spent
    7% of program spending

The 5 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $3,143,433.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.0M) Expenses 100 ($1.0M) Net assets 100 ($247k)2018 Revenue 101 ($1.1M) Expenses 102 ($1.1M) Net assets 102 ($252k)2019 Revenue 123 ($1.3M) Expenses 115 ($1.2M) Net assets 142 ($350k)2020 Revenue 321 ($3.4M) Expenses 266 ($2.8M) Net assets 384 ($947k)2021 Revenue 254 ($2.7M) Expenses 229 ($2.4M) Net assets 497 ($1.2M)2022 Revenue 312 ($3.3M) Expenses 224 ($2.3M) Net assets 883 ($2.2M)2023 Revenue 397 ($4.2M) Expenses 276 ($2.9M) Net assets 1410 ($3.5M)2024 Revenue 406 ($4.3M) Expenses 356 ($3.7M) Net assets 1637 ($4.0M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (406)Expenses (356)Net assets (1637)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $1.6M to $3.0M (+94%).

$300k
$309k
$411k
$1.1M
$1.6M
$3.0M
$4.2M
$4.5M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 20% · 2018 18%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

88% of MONUMENT IMPACT’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (16% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 1,617 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$10k
’17
$5k
’18
$98k
’19
$597k
’20
$279k
’21
$953k
’22
$1.3M
’23
$560k
’24
12
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed78888998
Joined·+4+3+1+1+3+2+4
No longer listed·3311225
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 5 funders to 21 funders, grant income rose $153k → $2.1M.

14 of 51 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 70% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of MONUMENT IMPACT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 51 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

MONUMENT IMPACT has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 17% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

89% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund MONUMENT IMPACT.

17%
largest funder
45%
top three
~11
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 46% · 2018 34% · 2019 53% · 2020 45% · 2021 27% · 2022 59% · 2023 30% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of MONUMENT IMPACT's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 61% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

70% of MONUMENT IMPACT's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $4.1M that is directly attributable, 89% of it comes from California funders.

WA
MN
NY
OR
IN
CA
DE

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $9.7M arriving through sponsors registered in 6 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

MONUMENT IMPACT holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 1,551 employment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin13% · above the median
Months of reserve11.8mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)22% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,551 employment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Organizations like MONUMENT IMPACT

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

85% of spending goes to programs.

Program 85%Management 12%Fundraising 3%

Governance

8
board members
88%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MONUMENT IMPACT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds MONUMENT IMPACT?
MONUMENT IMPACT (California) receives grants from 51 organizations whose IRS filings report $13,839,868 to it, the largest being THE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ($2,363,500). 31 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 70% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does MONUMENT IMPACT have?
IRS filings report 51 organizations giving $13,839,868 in grants to MONUMENT IMPACT, 31 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of MONUMENT IMPACT?
THE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $2,363,500 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like MONUMENT IMPACT find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 51 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing