Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Community foundation

San Antonio Area Foundation

To serve as your most trusted and impactful philanthropic partner.

$44M
Granted FY2024still arriving
379
Grants FY2024still arriving
23
States reached
$3.2M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$60MHealth$51MHuman Services$31MArts & Culture$18MYouth Development$18MFood & Nutrition$16MPhilanthropy$13MRecreation & Sports$10MOther$0
02FY2024 · 379 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 379 grants below total $35,418,375 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $44,323,810 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $8,905,435 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k55 grants · $398k
  • $10k–50k184 grants · $3.9M
  • $50k–250k108 grants · $10M
  • $250k+32 grants · $21M
$25,406
Median grant
23
States reached
$641M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND$3,197,710
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS - WASHINGTON DC$1,518,344
UNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY$1,358,848
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION$1,020,500
AID THE SILENT$1,006,618
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY$1,001,403
NEW BRAUNFELS FOOD BANK$809,350
BRIGHTON CENTER$760,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SAN ANTONIO$735,000
HAVEN FOR HOPE OF BEXAR COUNTY$660,750
DORA MAAR CULTURAL CENTER$640,000
LIFTFUND INC$545,500
CENTERS FOR APPLIED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY NETWORK$507,339
UT HEALTH SAN ANTONIO$468,697
CLASSICAL MUSIC INSTITUTE CMI$466,286
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $45.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OPERATION WARM INC: $221k → 10%ST JUDES RANCH FOR CHILDREN TEXAS REGION INC: $1.0M → 7%NATIONAL COMPASSION FUND LLC: $1.8M → 9%ST JUDES RANCH FOR CHILDREN TEXAS REGION INC: $500k → 7%ST JUDE'S RANCH FOR CHILDREN: $250k → 7%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS - WASHINGTON DC: $1.5M → 14%ST JUDE'S RANCH FOR CHILDREN - TEXAS REGION INC: $250k → 7%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS - WASHINGTON DC: $234k → 14%BOYSVILLE INC: $116k → 16%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION YWCA - SAN ANTONIO: $1.1M → 16%SAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN HOPE RESOURCE CENTER INC: $290k → 16%MADONNA CENTER INCORPORATED: $270k → 16%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO: $1.3M → 16%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO: $205k → 16%REACHING MAXIMUM INDEPENDENCE INC: $357k → 16%CHILDSAFE: $3.5M → 16%CHILDSAFE: $1.3M → 16%CHILDSAFE: $142k → 16%CHILDSAFE: $141k → 16%MORGANS WONDERLAND INCLUSION FOUNDATION: $14.4M → 16%AMERICAN INDIANS IN TEXAS AT THE SPANISH COLONIAL MISSIONS: $160k → 16%THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $858k → 16%THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $702k → 16%CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $522k → 16%THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER: $518k → 16%HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $275k → 16%AMERICAN INDIANS IN TEXAS AT THE SPANISH COLONIAL MISSIONS: $205k → 16%HOUSE OF NEIGHBORLY SERVICE: $204k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO: $186k → 16%GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO: $126k → 16%CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY INC: $511k → 16%GUARDIAN HOUSE: $1.0M → 16%CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $724k → 16%CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $618k → 16%GUARDIAN HOUSE: $336k → 16%MORNINGSIDE MINISTRIES: $282k → 16%CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $248k → 16%CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $216k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION: $211k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION: $165k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION: $148k → 16%ANY BABY CAN - SAN ANTONIO: $135k → 16%CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $134k → 16%PUTTING AN END TO ABUSE THROUGH COMMUNITY EFFORTS INITIATIVE: $166k → 16%PUTTING AN END TO ABUSE THROUGH COMMUNITY EFFORTS INITIATIVE: $165k → 16%MISSION ROAD DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: $253k → 16%SILVER AND BLACK GIVE BACK: $205k → 16%AMERICAN RED CROSS SAN ANTONIO AREA CHAPTER: $167k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$238M · 550 repeat orgs$26M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

550 repeat relationships — 306 still active in FY2024, 244 since wound down; 64 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

550
406

Total granted

$238M
$24M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+26%

Still filing today

83%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureAnimalsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO ACADEMY OF TEXAS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $12M · revenue +80% · 41% of their budget
  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK
    8× · 2017–2024 · $7.8M · revenue +60%
  • CC
    CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $6.8M · revenue +72% · 30% of their budget

Funded once

  • AE
    ARRAY EDUCATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $4.5M · revenue +170% · 47% of their budget
  • NC
    NATIONAL CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF CRIME INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1.8M · revenue +29% · 47% of their budget
  • INT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $1.6M · revenue -11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Antonio Medical Foundation

The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.

Health
2
Greater Satx

The mission of greater:satx is to lead the developemnt and diversification of san antonio regional economy through the recruitment and expansion of qualify employers and job producing investments.

—
3
San Antonio Area Foundation

To serve as your most trusted and impactful philanthropic partner.

Philanthropy
4
San Antonio Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Inc

The mission of the san antonio hispanic chamber of commerce is to advocate in building a better san antonio through the growth and prosperity of hispanic, small minority, women-owned businesses, and hispanic professional and trade…

—
5
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
6
Uatx

Uatx is a nonprofit dedicated to building a liberal arts university committed to freedom of inquiry, freedom of conscience, and civil discourse. to maintain these principles, the university will be fiercely independent financially,…

Education
7
Connectability

ConnectAbility's mission is to empower those with life altering disabilities and their caregivers to reach their fullest potential.

Human Services
8
Texas Tribune Inc

The texas tribune promotes civic engagement and public education across the state by producing and sharing for free public data interactives, statewide events and intensive and daily reporting on texas public policy, politics and current…

Education
9
San Antonio Foster Care and Adoption and Services

San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.

Human Services
10
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
11
Texas Forensic Nurse Examiners - Forensic Center of Excellence

Through a coordinated community response, the forensic center empowers victims, promotes healing and creates innovative and comprehensive solutions to fill gaps in victim services.

—
12
Community Information Now

Community information now (cinow) provides data, tools, analysis, and training to inform decisions to improve texas communities. cinow's vision is improved lives and decreased disparities through democratized data.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bcfs Health and Human Services and the most unlike its peers is Bamberger Ranch Preserve. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…United Way AffiliatesEnvironmental Conservation …Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Developmental Disabilities …Local History MuseumsCommunity FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…Addiction Recovery ServicesLocal Food System Organizat…Pregnancy Support ServicesCommunity Arts CentersSenior Support ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportAffordable Housing Construc…Food Banks and PantriesPolicy Research and AdvocacyElementary Literacy TutoringLgbtq+ Community SupportYouth Development ServicesCancer Support ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesEquine Therapy ProgramsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Military Veterans SupportYouth Mentoring ProgramsYmca Youth DevelopmentYouth Sports ProgramsFaith-Based Social ServicesDance Arts OrganizationsCommunity Food PantriesJewish Community Organizati…Independent K-12 SchoolsAffordable Housing Developm…Public Library OperationsAnimal Rescue and ShelterYouth Development CentersFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Christian Youth CampsSchool District FoundationsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%4%<5yr16%10%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr10%24%35–55yr13%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%1%<5yr16%12%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr10%24%35–55yr13%29%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%18/1,045
the rest of the field
15%
20,219/135,759

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

866 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 866 of the 1,045 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

63
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
234
Early backer (in before they grew)
827/866
Grantees still filing
596/866
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAN ANTONIO ACADEMY OF TEXAS — $11,959,784 · OtherSAN ANTONIO ACADEMY OF TEXASSAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION — $7,979,534 · OtherSAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATIONSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK — $7,822,761 · OtherSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANKCULINARY HEALTH EDUCATION FOR FAMILIES — $6,875,691 · OtherCULINARY HEALTH EDUCATION FOR FAMILIESUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $4,421,457 · OtherMorgan's Wonderland — $6,200,992 · OtherMorgan's Wonderland+85 more — $63,981,374 · Other+85 moreMorgan's Inclusion Initiative FKA Morgan's Wonderland Inclusion Foundation — $14,369,384 · Human ServicesMorgan's Inclusion In…CHILDSAFE — $5,137,972 · Human ServicesCHILDSAFETHE CHILDREN'S SHELTER — $2,756,698 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S SHELTE…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,176,304 · Human ServicesSJRC TEXAS INC — $2,109,000 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS — $2,032,902 · Human ServicesSA CHRISTIAN HOPE RESOURCE CNTR INC DBA SA HOPE CENTER — $1,991,250 · Human ServicesNATIONAL CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF CRIME INC — $1,800,390 · Human ServicesGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO — $1,697,700 · Human Services+20 more — $10,871,802 · Human Services+20 moreARRAY EDUCATION INC — $4,506,520 · EducationARRAY EDUCAT…Center For Applied Science & Technology Network — $4,175,339 · EducationCenter For A…Trinity University — $2,741,231 · EducationTrinity Univ…BRIGHTON CENTER — $2,608,550 · EducationBRIGHTON CEN…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SAN ANTONIO — $1,538,536 · EducationCOMMUNITIES …ALAMO COLLEGES FOUNDATION INC — $1,402,475 · EducationALAMO COLLEG…IDEA Public Schools — $1,000,000 · EducationOUR LADY OF THE LAKE UNIVERSITY OF SAN ANTONIO — $882,111 · Education+17 more — $6,472,240 · Education+17 moreCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $6,823,236 · HealthCHRISTUS CH…University Health Foundation — $6,268,207 · HealthUniversity …Planned Parenthood South Texas — $1,963,661 · HealthPlanned Par…RISE RECOVERY — $1,688,209 · HealthRISE RECOVE…MAYO CLINIC — $1,001,000 · HealthProject MEND — $858,897 · HealthSAN ANTONIO LIFETIME RECOVERY INC DBA LIFETIME RECOVERY — $838,000 · HealthCLARITY CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER — $832,744 · Health+11 more — $4,285,216 · Health+11 moreUNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY — $5,126,079 · PhilanthropyRAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND — $3,263,496 · PhilanthropySan Antonio Foundation for Excellence in Education Inc — $1,461,250 · PhilanthropyDORA MAAR CULTURAL CENTER FKA NANCY B NEGLEY ARTISTS RESIDENCY PROGRAM — $1,220,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC — $1,023,309 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF SAN ANTONIO — $700,835 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $591,958 · Philanthropy+2 more — $625,602 · PhilanthropyMCNAY ART MUSEUM — $2,275,000 · Arts & CultureWitte Museum — $1,333,121 · Arts & CultureTHE OPERA SAN ANTONIO DBA OPERA SAN AN — $589,786 · Arts & CultureARTPACE INC (AUDIT) — $529,824 · Arts & CultureTEXAS PUBLIC RADIO — $472,213 · Arts & CultureALAMO PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL DOING BUSINESS AS KLRN — $444,098 · Arts & CultureSAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART — $430,619 · Arts & CultureSan Antonio Report — $323,371 · Arts & CultureSCIENCE MILL — $292,357 · Arts & CultureMAGIK CHILDRENS THEATRE OF SAN ANTONIO DBA THE MAGIK THEATRE — $281,460 · Arts & Culture+6 more — $1,375,043 · Arts & CultureHUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT) — $2,492,559 · AnimalsROYAL ANIMAL REFUGE — $1,201,043 · AnimalsSAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY — $983,617 · AnimalsWILDLIFE RESCUE AND REHABILITATION INC — $487,915 · AnimalsANIMAL DEFENSE LEAGUE OF TEXAS — $486,920 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL BIRD RESCUE — $446,000 · AnimalsSan Antonio Pets Alive Inc — $336,000 · AnimalsSpay-Neuter Assistance Program Inc — $327,806 · AnimalsSPAY NEUTER INJECT PROTECT SANANTONIO — $310,050 · Animals+2 more — $465,000 · Animals
Other$109,241,593Human Services$44,943,402Education$25,327,002Health$24,559,170Philanthropy$14,012,529Arts & Culture$8,346,892Animals$7,536,910

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMorgan's Inclusion Initiative FKA Morgan's Wonderland Inclusion Foundation — $14,369,384 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSAN ANTONIO ACADEMY OF TEXAS — $11,959,784 over 8y, 41% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK — $7,822,761 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetCHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION — $6,823,236 over 8y, 30% of budgetUniversity Health Foundation — $6,268,207 over 3y, 69% of budgetMorgan's Wonderland — $6,200,992 over 8y, 92% of budgetCHILDSAFE — $5,137,972 over 5y, 33% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY — $5,126,079 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetARRAY EDUCATION INC — $4,506,520 over 1y, 47% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO ALUMNI ASSOCIATION — $4,421,457 over 5y, 22% of budgetCenter For Applied Science & Technology Network — $4,175,339 over 6y, 51% of budgetRAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND — $3,263,496 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC — $3,214,438 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetHELP ONE NOW — $3,153,000 over 8y, 23% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S SHELTER — $2,756,698 over 6y, 4.5% of budgetTrinity University — $2,741,231 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetBRIGHTON CENTER — $2,608,550 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT) — $2,492,559 over 8y, 15% of budgetMCNAY ART MUSEUM — $2,275,000 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $2,176,304 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSJRC TEXAS INC — $2,109,000 over 7y, 7.5% of budgetLIFTFUND INC — $2,050,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetCHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS — $2,032,902 over 8y, 17% of budgetSA CHRISTIAN HOPE RESOURCE CNTR INC DBA SA HOPE CENTER — $1,991,250 over 7y, 31% of budgetPlanned Parenthood South Texas — $1,963,661 over 8y, 7.1% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF CRIME INC — $1,800,390 over 1y, 47% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO — $1,697,700 over 7y, 39% of budgetRISE RECOVERY — $1,688,209 over 8y, 7.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,613,725 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC — $1,552,025 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SAN ANTONIO — $1,538,536 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetSan Antonio Foundation for Excellence in Education Inc — $1,461,250 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetHaven for Hope of Bexar County — $1,459,043 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetGUARDIAN HOUSE — $1,406,000 over 5y, 43% of budgetALAMO COLLEGES FOUNDATION INC — $1,402,475 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetAUTISM SERVICE CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO DBA AUTISM COMMUNITY NETWORK — $1,399,935 over 6y, 34% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO — $1,397,622 over 8y, 21% of budgetWitte Museum — $1,333,121 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetROY MAAS' YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC — $1,332,214 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetAID THE SILENT — $1,241,618 over 6y, 48% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SAN ANTONIO — $1,237,500 over 5y, 45% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES SAN ANTONIO — $1,235,896 over 6y, 18% of budgetDORA MAAR CULTURAL CENTER FKA NANCY B NEGLEY ARTISTS RESIDENCY PROGRAM — $1,220,000 over 2y, 89% of budgetROYAL ANIMAL REFUGE — $1,201,043 over 1y, 65% of budgetKIPP SAN ANTONIO INC — $1,101,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetCAMP TO SUCCESS — $1,058,400 over 2y, 83% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC — $1,023,309 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $1,001,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Morgan's Inclusion Initiative FKA Morgan's Wonderland Inclusion Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO ACADEMY OF TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds University Health Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Morgan's Wonderland ↗
  • Who funds CHILDSAFE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SAN ANTONIO AND BEXAR COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ARRAY EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Center For Applied Science & Technology Network ↗
  • Who funds RAYMOND JAMES CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HELP ONE NOW ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER ↗
  • Who funds Trinity University ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT) ↗
  • Who funds MCNAY ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds SJRC TEXAS INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFTFUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds SA CHRISTIAN HOPE RESOURCE CNTR INC DBA SA HOPE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Planned Parenthood South Texas ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF CRIME INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
  • Who funds RISE RECOVERY ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds INT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
  • Who funds San Antonio Foundation for Excellence in Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds Haven for Hope of Bexar County ↗
  • Who funds GUARDIAN HOUSE ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John L Santikos Chari…Harvey E Najim Charit…Faye L & William L Co…Nancy Smith Hurd Foun…Pryor Myra Stafford C…Elizabeth Huth Coates…St Luke's Lutheran He…The Texas Cavaliers C…Marcia & Otto Koehler…Betty Stieren Kelso F…United Way of San Ant…Methodist Healthcare …
John L Santikos Charitable FoundationTX255.2× affinity159 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · St Luke's Lutheran Health Ministries Inc · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation · Betty Stieren Kelso Foundation · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization San Antonio Area Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
  • National Center for Victims of Crime Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
56report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 1045 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines