· Private foundation
Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 44% of HARVEY E NAJIM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k18 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k108 grants · $2.8M
- $50k–250k71 grants · $6.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRY | $200,000 |
| SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION | $178,000 |
| SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK INC | $175,000 |
| YMCA OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO | $150,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN ANTONIO | $125,000 |
| ARCHDIOCESE OF SAN ANTONIO | $120,000 |
| CHILD ADVOCATES SAN ANTONIO | $120,000 |
| SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION | $115,198 |
| CHILDSAFE | $115,000 |
| COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SAN ANTON | $110,000 |
| THE CHILDRENS SHELTER | $110,000 |
| BOYSVILLE INC | $100,000 |
| SAN ANTONIO SPORTS FOUNDATION INC | $100,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH T | $100,000 |
| SA YOUTH | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $10.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.
195 repeat relationships — 156 still active in FY2024, 39 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $619k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SASAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK7× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +60%
- SASAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC6× · 2019–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +80%
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO6× · 2019–2024 · $751k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- ECEL CENTRO DEL BARRIO INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $500k · revenue +78%
- SMSAMM MINISTRIESone grant, 2017 · $250k
- YOYMCA OF GREATER SAone grant, 2017 · $200k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
To provide a neutral, child friendly organization that facilitates a multi-disciplinary approach to the investigation, intervention and treatment of child abuse.
Partner with families to provide students a christ-centered education while fostering a life of faith and service. the school desires to associate with like-minded teachers, administrators, staff, parents, and students to communicate the…
Fort Bend County Child Advocates, Inc. provides a voice, heals the hurt and breaks the cycle of abuse and neglect for children in Fort Bend County.
To educate qualified individuals of public benefits that they may be entitled to. we accomplish this by working with local city, state, and federal agencies for the purpose of outreach and verification work. recently we have focused mainly…
To provide services for the protection of abused and neglected children that are in the custody of the State of Texas.
Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.
To provide a safe, caring, and temporary home away from home for the families of children receiving essential medical services in san antonio, texas.
TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.
At Discovery School, our mission is to inspire and nurture the love of learning in young children and their families. The School offers an enhanced early childhood education for children 2 through 7 years to provide them with the skills…
Any baby can, an austin-based nonprofit, partners with parents so children reach their full potential. with programs that meet clients where they are at home, work or school any baby can provides in-home therapy, parent education, mental…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sa Youth and the most unlike its peers is Discovery Camps Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
211 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 211 of the 300 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds CHILDSAFE ↗
- Who funds SA YOUTH ↗
- Who funds BOYSVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTON CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER ↗
- Who funds CLARITY CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds ECUMENICAL CENTER FOR RELIGION AND HEALT ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO SPORTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds NEW BRAUNFELS CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SUNSHINE COTTAGE SCHOOL FOR DEAF CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds HILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ASSOC FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL ( ↗
- Who funds MISSION ROAD DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds EL CENTRO DEL BARRIO INC ↗
- Who funds SIGHT SAVERS OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
- Who funds House of Neighborly Service of San Antonio Texas ↗
- Who funds Family Service Association of San Antonio Inc ↗
- Who funds ANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
- Who funds Kinetic Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds THE WINSTON SCHOOL SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds ROY MAAS' YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds ARMS OF HOPE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · St Luke's Lutheran Health Ministries Inc · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.