How much did PRYOR MYRA STAFFORD CHAR TR F0030100 grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 55% of PRYOR MYRA STAFFORD CHAR TR F0030100’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

junior

2021

incarnate wordbankconservancycare san

2022

conservancy

2023

cancerministrieshopealamo

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 78 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k5 grants · $10k
$10k–50k59 grants · $1.2M
$50k–250k14 grants · $755k

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$43M

Total assets

Largest grants

Crosspoint INC$100,000
SAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART$55,000
Mission Road Developmental Center$50,000
Villa Finale$50,000
Alamo Public Telecommunications - KLRN$50,000
Young Womens Christian Association$50,000
The Childrens Shelter$50,000
Youth Orchestras of San Antonio$50,000
Tobin Center for the Performing Arts$50,000
San Antonio Food Bank$50,000
Haven For Hope$50,000
New Braunfels Youth Collaborative$50,000
Real Life Community Outreach$50,000
Ronald McDonald House Charities Of$50,000
Boy Scouts Of America$41,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$6.4M · 87 repeat orgs$2.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

87 repeat relationships — 46 still active in FY2024, 41 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$6.4M

$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%

+21%

Still filing today

55%

51%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $997k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

FS
FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION
5× · 2020–2024 · $220k · revenue +30%
SA
San Antonio Food Bank
3× · 2021–2024 · $151k · revenue +12%
SA
SAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART
5× · 2020–2024 · $150k · revenue +50%

Funded once

Y
YMCA-SANANTONIO
one grant, 2023 · $100k
AC
American Cancer Society
one grant, 2023 · $50k
GH
Guardian Housegraduated
one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +297%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

San Antonio Regional Hospital

Our mission is to improve the health and well-being of the people we serve.

Health

San Antonio Medical Foundation

The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improve health care, advance biomedical science, and provide leadership & active stewardship of our land and other assets.

Health

Christus Health Southeast Texas

Supporting the health care ministries of the sponsoring congregations in extending the healing ministry of jesus christ in conformity with the teachings of the catholic church.

Health

Planned Parenthood San Antonio

Provide family planning and reproductive healthcare services to those in need.

Health

Tennis Officials of San Antonio Association

Recreation & Sports

Connectability

ConnectAbility's mission is to empower those with life altering disabilities and their caregivers to reach their fullest potential.

Human Services

San Antonio Foster Care and Adoption and Services

San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.

Human Services

The McCombs School of Business

To provide support to The University of Texas McCombs School of Business.

Education

Good Samaritan Center of San Antonio

Good samaritan center of san antonio, texas is a non-profit institution whose mission is to serve as a catalyst for change, supporting individuals and families through excellent community services to overcome the impact of poverty.…

Human Services

Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services

Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas

Not-for-profit, community owned, health care facilities with spiritual values, dedicated to providing high quality health services in a christian environment.

Health

Communities in Schools of San Antonio

To surround students with a community of support, empowering them to stay in school and achieve in life.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Advocates San Antonio and the most unlike its peers is Trinity University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/98

the rest of the field

13%

940/7,100

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

95 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

95/95

Grantees still filing

72/95

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$4,907,937Human Services$1,345,275Health$718,495Education$594,000Arts & Culture$592,729Youth Development$180,000Recreation & Sports$125,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area FoundationTX122.2× affinity62 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable · John R & Greli N Less Charitable Trust · The Charity Ball Association Of · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · Charitable Foundation Frost F0359600 · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation PRYOR MYRA STAFFORD CHAR TR F0030100 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: St Lukes Episcopal School.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~9 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 7 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 262913141 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on St Lukes Episcopal School, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 9 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 21% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100?

Find your warmest path to Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

PRYOR MYRA STAFFORD CHAR TR F0030100

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

95 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100?

More from the funding graph

PRYOR MYRA STAFFORD CHAR TR F0030100

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

95 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100?

More from the funding graph