· Private foundation
Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k55 grants · $1.3M
- $50k–250k10 grants · $583k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAN ANTONIO LIFETIME RECOVERY | $100,000 |
| CLARITY CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER | $72,050 |
| Individual grant recipient | $61,325 |
| KEYSTONE SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| BELIEVE IT FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| Childrens Rehabilitation Institute Tele | $50,000 |
| Crosspoint INC | $50,000 |
| ST DAVID'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| BRACKENRIDGE PARK CONSERVANCY | $50,000 |
| Haven For Hope | $50,000 |
| San Antonio Food Bank | $45,132 |
| Boy Scouts Of America | $45,000 |
| MCNAY ART MUSEUM | $45,000 |
| RAINBOW SENIOR CENTER | $45,000 |
| THE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO INC | $42,125 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
106 repeat relationships — 60 still active in FY2025, 46 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $331k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FSFamily Service Association of San Antonio Inc5× · 2020–2024 · $220k · revenue +61%
- SASAN ANTONIO LIFETIME RECOVERY INC DBA LIFETIME RECOVERY5× · 2021–2025 · $200k · revenue +60%
- CICROSSPOINT INC2× · 2024–2025 · $150k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- YYMCA-SANANTONIOone grant, 2023 · $100k
- WMWitte Museumgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +370%
- MRMISSION ROAD DEVELOPMENTAL CENTERone grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue -6%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of greater:satx is to lead the developemnt and diversification of san antonio regional economy through the recruitment and expansion of qualify employers and job producing investments.
San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.
The mission of sa talent, inc. is to educate and develop youth and adults into the talent needs of san antonio's current and future employers and provide services for the regional employers for the retention and growth of their local…
The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.
To foster human and community development through community-based arts.
The mission of the san antonio hispanic chamber of commerce is to advocate in building a better san antonio through the growth and prosperity of hispanic, small minority, women-owned businesses, and hispanic professional and trade…
To serve as your most trusted and impactful philanthropic partner.
Represent public education employees in labor related matters, to include matters specific to wages, hours, and thier condition of employment.
The san antonio symphony's mission is to delight, engage, and inspire the entire community through excellent performance, education, and outreach
ConnectAbility's mission is to empower those with life altering disabilities and their caregivers to reach their fullest potential.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alamo Area Rape Crisis Center and the most unlike its peers is Columbus Historic Preservation Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
115 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 115 of the 178 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Family Service Association of San Antonio Inc ↗
- Who funds CLARITY CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO LIFETIME RECOVERY INC DBA LIFETIME RECOVERY ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds CROSSPOINT INC ↗
- Who funds BOYSVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds University Health Foundation ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds Haven for Hope of Bexar County ↗
- Who funds MCNAY ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds ALPHA HOME INC ↗
- Who funds AUTISTIC TREATMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds SA CHRISTIAN HOPE RESOURCE CNTR INC DBA SA HOPE CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds MORNINGSIDE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds SAY SI ↗
- Who funds SOUTH TEXAS BLOOD & TISSUE CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER ↗
- Who funds Trinity University ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds FAMILY ENDEAVORS INC ↗
- Who funds Brackenridge Park Conservancy ↗
- Who funds CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Remember the Alamo Foundation ↗
- Who funds Christian Assistance Ministry ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · John R & Greli N Less Charitable Trust #FE324 · Betty Stieren Kelso Foundation · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · St Luke's Lutheran Health Ministries Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.