Texas · Nonprofit
PUTTING AN END TO ABUSE THROUGH COMMUNITY EFFORTS
PUTTING AN END TO ABUSE THROUGH COMMUNITY EFFORTS (Texas) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $661,542 to it, the largest being SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION ($331,200). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 51% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- Revenue FY2025
- $410k
- Funders on record
- 4
- Grants received
- $662k
- Net assets
- $114k
What Putting an End to Abuse Through Community Efforts does
Mission
Peace initiative is to educate community about the extent, and often-deadly consequences of domestic violence and to respond effectively though collaborative efforts.
As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.
Programs
Community development - 9,000 people received information on the prevention of domestic violence and 9,000 of those participated in workshops on domestic violence prevention. They also participated in and received informatikon on the prevention and awareness of child abuse. P.e.a.c.e. Initiative works with empower house providing educational classes on domestic violence to the mutual clients served. These classes are delivered in both english and spanish. Case management/consultation for the individual students is available in all classes. P.e.a.c.e also provides positive parenting programs.
$77,997 spent24% of program spendingDomestic violence survivor program - provided seventy-five (75) individuals and their families cognitive processing therapy (cpt) and resource allocation by a case manager solely assigned to this program. The case managers provided evidence-based cpt and assisted the victim with accessing multiple services and resources, psycho-education regarding domestic violence, and trauma-focused treatment. The secondary services of the program include legal representation by staff attorney services and a court advocate. These services have three overarching roles: 1) to educate the victim on the legal system processes, 2) to prepare court documents for civil and criminal cases, and 3) accompany the victim to all court hearings associated with their case.
$70,339 spent22% of program spendingP.e.a.c.e works with the ait-scm - american indians of texas and the spanish colonial missions non-profit in their "it takes a village" program for at risk youth providing education on teen dating violence. P.e.a.c.e also provided their professional staff consultation and training and case debriefing services for the population that they serve as part of the san antonio fatherhood campaign.
$6,681 spent2% of program spendingSan antonio gun buy back program
$166,000 spent52% of program spending
The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $321,017.
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
Balance sheet
Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $228k to $116k (−49%).
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2017 70% · 2018 64% · 2019 58% · 2021 55% · 2022 19% · 2023 61% · 2024 74% · 2025 84%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
100% of PUTTING AN END TO ABUSE THROUGH COMMUNITY EFFORTS’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (91% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 7 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Leadership and staff
The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.
Who funds it, year by year
2019 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income fell $300k → $166k.
3 of 4 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 51% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of PUTTING AN END TO ABUSE THROUGH COMMUNITY EFFORTS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
PUTTING AN END TO ABUSE THROUGH COMMUNITY EFFORTS leans on a few funders — its largest provides 50% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PUTTING AN END TO ABUSE THROUGH COMMUNITY EFFORTS.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 100% · 2021 100% · 2022 100% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
51% of PUTTING AN END TO ABUSE THROUGH COMMUNITY EFFORTS's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $325k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Texas funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $337k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Against its field
PUTTING AN END TO ABUSE THROUGH COMMUNITY EFFORTS has grown faster than three-quarters of the 13,062 human services nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 13,062 human services nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Organizations like PUTTING AN END TO ABUSE THROUGH COMMUNITY EFFORTS
Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Texas
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
93% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
66%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PUTTING AN END TO ABUSE THROUGH COMMUNITY EFFORTS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds PUTTING AN END TO ABUSE THROUGH COMMUNITY EFFORTS?
- PUTTING AN END TO ABUSE THROUGH COMMUNITY EFFORTS (Texas) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $661,542 to it, the largest being SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION ($331,200). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 51% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
- How many funders does PUTTING AN END TO ABUSE THROUGH COMMUNITY EFFORTS have?
- IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $661,542 in grants to PUTTING AN END TO ABUSE THROUGH COMMUNITY EFFORTS, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of PUTTING AN END TO ABUSE THROUGH COMMUNITY EFFORTS?
- SAN ANTONIO AREA FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $331,200 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like PUTTING AN END TO ABUSE THROUGH COMMUNITY EFFORTS find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
Play a game about who funds Putting an End to Abuse Through Community Efforts →
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 4 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing