· Public charity
Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc
In furtherance of the founders' vision of "serving humanity to honor god," methodist healthcare ministries of south texas, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k33 grants · $831k
- $50k–250k102 grants · $13M
- $250k+81 grants · $50M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Southwest Texas Regional Advisory Council | $4,782,436 |
| El Centro del Barrio (DBA CentroMed) | $3,067,001 |
| Community Health Development | $1,458,054 |
| Gateway Community Health Center Inc | $1,441,697 |
| Clarity Child Guidance Center | $1,440,000 |
| Family Service Association of San Antonio Inc | $1,255,849 |
| Comp-U-Dopt | $1,197,000 |
| Mercy Ministries of Laredo | $1,172,231 |
| Barrio Comprehensive Family Health Care Center Inc | $984,000 |
| Texas A&M Health Science Center | $942,753 |
| South Texas Rural Health Service | $897,297 |
| Ascension DePaul Services | $868,972 |
| West Texas Counseling & Guidance Inc | $836,540 |
| University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio | $822,880 |
| I Care San Antonio | $816,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $57.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
205 repeat relationships — 168 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down; 47 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- STSOUTHWEST TEXAS REGIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL7× · 2018–2024 · $30M · revenue +63%
- ECEL CENTRO DEL BARRIO INC7× · 2017–2024 · $16M · revenue +78%
- BCBarrio Comprehensive Family Health Care Center Inc7× · 2017–2024 · $12M · revenue +401%
Funded once
- UCUvalde CISD Moving Forward Foundationone grant, 2023 · $1.0M · revenue -24%
- WWWHOLESOME WAVE INCone grant, 2019 · $350k · revenue -58%
- TATEXAS ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $240k · revenue +28%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide community-based primary healthcare with particular concern for the poor and needy. with a coordinated and holistic apporach in caring for body, mind, and spirit, offer affordable health care, social service, and health education…
To continuously improve the lives of South Texans by providing high quality health care, education, housing and economic opportunities to reduce poverty through services and partnerships.
To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.
Our mission is to provide Accessible and Affordable Holistic-Based mental-health care to the communities we serve without without regard to their background or insurance status in a caring environment.
To provide medical and dental care and health education to low-income and uninsured residents of southeast texas.
Empowering north texans to optimize health through outreach, education, prevention, evidence-based interventions, integration, and quality measurement.
Provide a 3 share plan that offers low-cost premium assistance to pay part of the monthly health benefit cost for low income employees. The cost of the program is split between the employer, employee, and TexHealth.
The organization provides medical services in the form of primary and preventive care to underserved and underinsured residents of harris county.
Affordable Homes of South Texas, Inc. is organized for the purpose of providing housing for qualified low-income families within the City of McAllen, Texas and Hidalgo County, Texas.
Our mission is to provide accessible, compassionate, culturally competent, and quality health care, affordable for all, regardless of ability to pay.
To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…
El Buen Samaritano an outreach ministry of the Episcopal Diocese of Texas serving the Latino community of Central Texas is committed to recognizing the dignity of all by ensuring access to health care education and essential needs that…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Haven for Hope of Bexar County and the most unlike its peers is National Institute of Mexican American History of Civil Rights. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
262 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 262 of the 349 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SOUTHWEST TEXAS REGIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds EL CENTRO DEL BARRIO INC ↗
- Who funds Barrio Comprehensive Family Health Care Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Gateway Community Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Family Service Association of San Antonio Inc ↗
- Who funds MERCY MINISTRIES OF LAREDO ↗
- Who funds CLARITY CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Ascension DePaul Services ↗
- Who funds WEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE ↗
- Who funds ECUMENICAL CENTER FOR RELIGION AND HEALT ↗
- Who funds South Texas Rural Health Services ↗
- Who funds AMISTAD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SOLUTIONS OF SOUTH TEXAS ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HOPE PROJECTS INC ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN DENTAL CLINIC ↗
- Who funds Lower Rio Grande Valley Community Health Management ↗
- Who funds National Center For Behavioral Health Solutions ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood South Texas ↗
- Who funds EMPOWER HOUSE SA ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER ↗
- Who funds RURAL ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds Jewish Family Service of San Antonio Texas Inc ↗
- Who funds LA UNION DEL PUEBLO ENTERO ↗
- Who funds United Medical Centers ↗
- Who funds NUESTRA CLINICA DEL VALLE INC ↗
- Who funds TEJAS HEALTH CARE ↗
- Who funds FORM COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds I CARE SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS LUTHERAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds C3HIE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · St Luke's Lutheran Health Ministries Inc · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County · San Antonio Food Bank · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Valley Baptist Legacy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mhp Salud — 66% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.