Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

WHAT'S NEXT WASHINGTON

WHAT'S NEXT WASHINGTON (Washington) receives grants from 13 organizations whose IRS filings report $295,388 to it, the largest being SEATTLE FOUNDATION ($80,000). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 61% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2022
$157k
Funders on record
13
Grants received
$295k
Net assets
$60k
7/13 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 66%
01What it does

What What's Next Washington does

Mission

To improve the ability of people with conviction histories to reintegrate into society and achieve longterm economic stability.

As stated on its FY2022 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Partnering for the inclusive workforce project is designed to help employers tap into a labor pool ready to work-people with conviction histories. Developed by those directly impacted, the piwp helps employers recruit , hire, and retain fit ( formerly incarcerated talent) to meet their hiring goals. Access high-quality talent overcome bias and fear through wnw trainings. Improve recruiting, hiring and retention through use of wnw's assessment tools, and develope connections with wrap-around service providers.

    $123,087 spent
    100% of program spending
  2. Inclusive recovery program : increase hiring of people with conviction histories under dei. Determine goals, committments, staff involved, and understand these questions: which hr team, division, region are we working with? What department will be open for jobs? How many jobs over a two year period? What are those jobs?

    $165 spent
    0% of program spending
  3. Other programs includes employment advisory committee, train the trainer, interview and coaching

The 3 programs described on its FY2022 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $123,252.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($61k) Expenses 100 ($61k) Net assets 0 ($0)2021 Revenue 383 ($232k) Expenses 449 ($272k) Net assets 100 ($37k)2022 Revenue 259 ($157k) Expenses 221 ($134k) Net assets 164 ($60k)
201820212022
Revenue (259)Expenses (221)Net assets (164)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $37k to $60k (+62%).

$60k
$37k
$60k
201820212022
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2021
2022
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of WHAT'S NEXT WASHINGTON’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (62% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 12,439 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 3 reported years ran a deficit.

$0
’18
−$40k
’21
$23k
’22
5.4
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Susan Mason

Executive director

As listed on its FY2022 Form 990.

20212022
Listed109
Joined·+0
No longer listed·1
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 1 funder, grant income fell $6k → $59.

6 of 13 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 61% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of WHAT'S NEXT WASHINGTON’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

WHAT'S NEXT WASHINGTON has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 27% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

72% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund WHAT'S NEXT WASHINGTON.

27%
largest funder
50%
top three
~8
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 75% · 2019 30% · 2020 33% · 2021 46% · 2022 24% · 2023 100% — broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

40% of WHAT'S NEXT WASHINGTON's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 54% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

61% of WHAT'S NEXT WASHINGTON's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $114k that is directly attributable, 71% of it comes from Washington funders.

WA
NY
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $181k arriving through sponsors registered in 5 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

WHAT'S NEXT WASHINGTON has grown faster than three-quarters of the 10,885 community improvement nonprofits its size.

Operating margin15% · above the median
Months of reserve5.4mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)27% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 10,885 community improvement nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2022

Organizations like WHAT'S NEXT WASHINGTON

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

92% of spending goes to programs.

Program 92%Management 8%Fundraising 0%

Governance

9
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

87%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for WHAT'S NEXT WASHINGTON: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds WHAT'S NEXT WASHINGTON?
WHAT'S NEXT WASHINGTON (Washington) receives grants from 13 organizations whose IRS filings report $295,388 to it, the largest being SEATTLE FOUNDATION ($80,000). 7 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 61% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does WHAT'S NEXT WASHINGTON have?
IRS filings report 13 organizations giving $295,388 in grants to WHAT'S NEXT WASHINGTON, 7 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of WHAT'S NEXT WASHINGTON?
SEATTLE FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $80,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like WHAT'S NEXT WASHINGTON find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds What's Next Washington →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2022 (financials across 2018–2022), and the filings of 13 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing