· Private foundation
Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k26 grants · $148k
- $10k–50k33 grants · $375k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILD ADVOCATES OF SA | $20,000 |
| THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER | $15,000 |
| CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| ROY MAAS YOUTH ALERNATIVES | $15,000 |
| GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHWEST TEXAS | $15,000 |
| WONDERS AND WORRIES INC | $15,000 |
| ST JUDE'S RANCH FOR CHILDREN | $15,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN ANTONIO | $15,000 |
| FRIENDS OF CIBOLO WILDERNESS | $10,000 |
| Family Service Association of San Antonio | $10,000 |
| SAN ANTONIO CHILDRENS MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| NEW BRAUNFELS YOUTH COLLABORATIVE | $10,000 |
| HILL COUNTRY FAMILY SERVICES | $10,000 |
| Guardian House | $10,000 |
| COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF SAN ANTONIO | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $965k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
130 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2025, 83 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $80k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GSGIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHWEST TEXAS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $120k · revenue +9%
- HSHUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO8× · 2017–2025 · $105k · revenue +4%
- FVFAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION SERVICES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $95k · revenue +58%
Funded once
- HCHILL COUNTRY YOUTH RANCHone grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
- MIMorgan's Inclusion Initiative FKA Morgan's Wonderland Inclusion Foundationone grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
- CFCENTER FOR HEALTH CARE SERVICESone grant, 2022 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.
ConnectAbility's mission is to empower those with life altering disabilities and their caregivers to reach their fullest potential.
The mission of sa talent, inc. is to educate and develop youth and adults into the talent needs of san antonio's current and future employers and provide services for the regional employers for the retention and growth of their local…
Child Advocacy
The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.
The mission of greater:satx is to lead the developemnt and diversification of san antonio regional economy through the recruitment and expansion of qualify employers and job producing investments.
Publishing a local online news source. We believe a well informed and connected community is essential to making San Antonio a better place to live, work and play.
At Discovery School, our mission is to inspire and nurture the love of learning in young children and their families. The School offers an enhanced early childhood education for children 2 through 7 years to provide them with the skills…
To provide alcohol and drug use prevention, intervention and recovery services to children, youth and adults in the community.
To provide a neutral, child friendly organization that facilitates a multi-disciplinary approach to the investigation, intervention and treatment of child abuse.
The mission of the san antonio hispanic chamber of commerce is to advocate in building a better san antonio through the growth and prosperity of hispanic, small minority, women-owned businesses, and hispanic professional and trade…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childrens Bereavement Center of South Texas and the most unlike its peers is Discovery Camps Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
171 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 171 of the 230 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF SOUTHWEST TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT) ↗
- Who funds FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER ↗
- Who funds BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ALAMO AREA COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTON CENTER ↗
- Who funds Haven for Hope of Bexar County ↗
- Who funds CLARITY CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Kinetic Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ASSOC FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL ( ↗
- Who funds San Antonio Pets Alive Inc ↗
- Who funds ROY MAAS' YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CIBOLO WILDERNESS ↗
- Who funds AUTISTIC TREATMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDSAFE ↗
- Who funds GUARDIAN HOUSE ↗
- Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds Family Service Association of San Antonio Inc ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds ANY BABY CAN OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
- Who funds Respite Care of San Antonio Inc ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC ↗
- Who funds Guide Dogs of Texas Inc ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL DEFENSE LEAGUE OF TEXAS ↗
- Who funds HEALY-MURPHY CENTER ↗
- Who funds HILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds MCNAY ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds MISSION ROAD DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · Betty Stieren Kelso Foundation · St Luke's Lutheran Health Ministries Inc · John R & Greli N Less Charitable Trust #FE324
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.