Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Marguerite Casey Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$33M
Granted FY2024still arriving
208
Grants FY2024still arriving
31
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Civil Rights$72MCommunity Improvement$32MPhilanthropy$22MHuman Services$14MPublic Benefit$13MEducation$11MEnvironment$9.1MArts & Culture$8.2MOther$0
02FY2024 · 208 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $36k
  • $10k–50k69 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k59 grants · $7.0M
  • $250k+60 grants · $25M
$50,000
Median grant
31
States reached
$877M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BUILDUS$1,500,000
SCHOLARS FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE$1,500,000
TENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION (TIRRC)$900,000
FOOT SOLDIERS PARK$833,333
JUSTICE CATALYST ACCESS FUND INC$500,000
KENTUCKY COALITION$500,000
Individual grant recipient$500,000
MORE PERFECT UNION FOUNDATION$500,000
BLACK LEADERS ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITIES EDUCATION FUND$500,000
FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER$500,000
LEADERS IGNITING TRANSFORMATION EDUCATION FUND$500,000
FLORIDA RIGHTS RESTORATION COALITION$500,000
CONGREGATIONS ORGANIZED FOR PROPHETIC ENGAGEMENT (COPE)$500,000
COMMUNITIES UNITED$500,000
FLORIDA IMMIGRANT COALITION$500,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $23.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LATINO CENTER FOR PREVENTION AND ACTION IN HEALTH AND WELFARE DBA LATINO HE: $300k → 10%CENTER ON POLICY INITIATIVES: $188k → 11%PUBLIC ALLIES: $825k → 17%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - ATLANTA: $750k → 9%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $250k → 14%ALASKA CHILDREN'S TRUST: $200k → 22%LATINO CENTER FOR PREVENTION AND ACTION IN HEALTH AND WELFARE DBA LATINO HE: $200k → 10%CENTER ON POLICY INITIATIVES: $188k → 11%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - ATLANTA: $375k → 9%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $250k → 14%HOPE COMMUNITY CENTER: $188k → 13%ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - ATLANTA: $375k → 9%THE TASK FORCE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH: $500k → 14%LATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $300k → 10%NAEVA: $250k → 14%WORKMONEY FOUNDATION INC: $350k → 17%NAVA EDUCATION PROJECT: $250k → 14%NAEVA: $250k → 14%AMERICAN INDIANS IN TEXAS - SPANISH COLONIAL MISSIONS: $250k → 16%FREEDOM INC: $500k → 10%AMERICAN INDIANS IN TEXAS - SPANISH COLONIAL MISSIONS: $250k → 16%FREEDOM INC: $500k → 10%FREEDOM INC: $500k → 10%FREEDOM INC: $200k → 10%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $250k → 14%COLEMAN ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH: $250k → 10%GEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS: $200k → 14%COLEMAN ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH: $175k → 10%CALIFORNIA CHILD CARE RESOURCE AND REFERRAL NETWORK: $225k → 10%GATHERING FOR JUSTICE: $200k → 17%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $250k → 12%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $250k → 12%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $250k → 12%STRATEGIC CONCEPTS IN ORGANIZING AND POLICY EDUCATION (SCOPE): $375k → 14%STRATEGIC CONCEPTS IN ORGANIZING AND POLICY EDUCATION (SCOPE): $250k → 14%CONSEJO DE FEDERACIONES MEXICANAS EN NORTE AMERICA (COFEM): $188k → 14%STRATEGIC CONCEPTS IN ORGANIZING AND POLICY EDUCATION (SCOPE): $250k → 14%TIDES CENTER: $833k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $300k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $200k → 10%TIDES CENTER: $200k → 10%LATINO COMMUNITY FUND OF WASHINGTON STATE: $265k → 9%WASHINGTON IMMIGRANT SOLIDARITY NETWORK: $223k → 9%WASHINGTON IMMIGRANT SOLIDARITY NETWORK: $223k → 9%EQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION: $330k → 14%THE HANA CENTER: $500k → 14%THE HANA CENTER: $500k → 14%THE HANA CENTER: $500k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
DC
HI
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Marguerite Casey Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Marguerite Casey Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$165M · 370 repeat orgs$35M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

370 repeat relationships — 86 still active in FY2024, 284 since wound down; 94 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

370
352

Total granted

$165M
$20M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+19%

Still filing today

86%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsEducationCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FR
    FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +139%
  • TC
    THE CENTER FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH AND SOCIAL CHANGE INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +7% · 26% of their budget
  • IM
    INNER-CITY MUSLIM ACTION NETWORK
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • CC
    CALIFORNIA CALLS EDUCATION FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $1.0M · revenue -9%
  • C
    CRAFT3graduated
    one grant, 2022 · $650k · revenue +179%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $650k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
2
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
3
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
4
The Alliance for Collective Action

The Alliance for Collective Action convenes leaders of environmental and social movements to advance solutions for a thriving planet. We advance our mission through the Alliance Center building and community, as well as through Collective…

Environment
5
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
6
Columbia Legal Services

Columbia legal services advocates for laws that advance social, economic, and racial equity for people living in poverty. our work is to end exclusionary policies that have invested in walls and bars rather than investing in people and…

Crime & Legal
7
Forward Justice Action Network

Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…

Human Services
8
Equal Justice Society

The Equal Justice Society (EJS) is transforming the nations consciousness on racethrough law, social science, and the arts. EJS works to dismantle structural andinstitutional racism to advance robust equal protection under the Fourteenth…

Civil Rights
9
South Asian Americans Leading Together

South Asian Americans Leading Together is a national movement strategy and advocacy organization committed to racial justice through structural change.

—
10
Ampt Advancing Nonprofits

Advancing Nonprofits is committed to strengthening the organizational health and support long-term development of small nonprofits on Chicagos west and south sides while prioritizing Black- and Latine-led community organizations.…

Community Improvement
11
Washington Area Community Investment Fund Inc

The washington area community investment fund (wacif) is a nonprofit community loan fund focused on increasing equity and economic opportunity in the washington, dc area's underserved communities. wacif's mission is driven is driven by…

—
12
Colorado Center On Law and Policy

Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Policylink and the most unlike its peers is Liminal Publishing. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and AdvocacyEnvironmental Conservation …Elementary Literacy TutoringLgbtq+ Community SupportYouth Mentoring ProgramsSchool District FoundationsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Youth Development ServicesCommunity Food PantriesAnimal Rescue and ShelterPublic Library OperationsFood Banks and PantriesPregnancy Support ServicesLocal History MuseumsCommunity College Foundatio…Domestic Violence ServicesCancer Support ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Local Food System Organizat…Community Arts CentersJewish Community Organizati…Health Access Advocacy and …Women & Girls Leadership De…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Independent K-12 SchoolsAffordable Housing Developm…Immigrant Worker Support
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%6%<5yr14%14%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%11%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%5%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%38%20–35yr13%21%35–55yr16%6%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%7/689
the rest of the field
13%
240,389/1,818,876

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

657 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 657 of the 842 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

39
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
185
Early backer (in before they grew)
642/657
Grantees still filing
410/657
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC — $2,388,750 · Civil RightsSOUTHERNERS ON NEW GR…FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC — $2,173,750 · Civil RightsFLORIDA RISING TOGETH…ARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT — $1,960,000 · Civil RightsARIZONA CENTER FOR EM…Florida Immigrant Coalition Inc — $1,880,000 · Civil RightsFlorida Immigrant Coa…Native Americans in Philanthropy — $1,785,000 · Civil RightsNative Americans in P…FOOT SOLDIERS PARK INC — $1,666,667 · Civil RightsFOOT SOLDIERS PARK IN…TENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION — $1,640,000 · Civil RightsCOLOR OF CHANGEORG EDUCATION FUND — $1,270,200 · Civil RightsPOWER COALITION FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE — $1,256,250 · Civil RightsSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT — $1,215,000 · Civil RightsMORE PERFECT UNION FOUNDATION — $1,200,000 · Civil RightsSOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO — $1,170,000 · Civil RightsTHE OLE EDUCATION FUND — $1,095,000 · Civil RightsKC TENANTS — $1,074,300 · Civil Rights+14 more — $9,347,000 · Civil Rights+14 moreKENTUCKY COALITION INC — $2,365,000 · Other+92 more — $59,785,434 · Other+92 moreTIDES CENTER — $4,419,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTERASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA INC — $1,845,000 · Human ServicesASIAN AMERICANS …THE HANA CENTER — $1,820,000 · Human ServicesTHE HANA CENTERFREEDOM INC — $1,700,500 · Human ServicesFREEDOM INCPUBLIC ALLIES INC — $1,207,500 · Human ServicesPUENTE HUMAN RIGHTS MOVEMENT — $1,182,500 · Human ServicesTEWA WOMEN UNITED — $950,000 · Human ServicesGEORGIA LATINO ALLIANCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC — $950,000 · Human ServicesStrategic Concepts In Organizing & Policy Education — $925,000 · Human ServicesNAEVA — $860,000 · Human Services+16 more — $7,966,150 · Human Services+16 moreTEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT EDUCATION FUND — $2,438,750 · Community ImprovementTEXAS ORGANIZI…INNER-CITY MUSLIM ACTION NETWORK — $2,085,000 · Community ImprovementINNER-CITY MUS…COMMUNITIES UNITED — $1,820,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITIES UN…LA UNION DEL PUEBLO ENTERO — $1,695,000 · Community ImprovementLA UNION DEL P…FAITH IN ACTION NETWORK — $1,250,000 · Community ImprovementFAITH IN ACTIO…Kenwood Oakland Community Organization — $1,070,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY COALITION FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT — $1,060,000 · Community ImprovementLogan Square Neighborhood Association — $1,000,000 · Community ImprovementRVC SEATTLE — $762,000 · Community ImprovementFAIR COUNT INC — $757,500 · Community ImprovementPEOPLE'S ACTION INSTITUTE — $725,000 · Community ImprovementCENTRO POR LA JUSTICIA — $719,000 · Community Improvement+12 more — $5,415,706 · Community Improvement+12 moreMAJORITYACTION — $2,150,000 · EnvironmentHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $1,898,650 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUND — $1,315,000 · EnvironmentNEW MEXICO ACEQUIA ASSOCIATION — $995,000 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $925,000 · EnvironmentGot Green — $867,000 · EnvironmentARKANSAS PUBLIC POLICY PANEL INC — $757,500 · EnvironmentWINDWARD FUND — $750,000 · EnvironmentEnvironmental Health Coalition — $545,000 · EnvironmentSTATEWIDE ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT RESOURCE PROJECT — $488,000 · EnvironmentSUSTAINABLE MARKETS FOUNDATION — $400,000 · Environment+1 more — $360,000 · EnvironmentTIDES FOUNDATION — $4,181,000 · PhilanthropyAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc — $1,670,000 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FOR APPALACHIAN KENTUCKY INC — $850,000 · PhilanthropyROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $676,000 · PhilanthropySOUTHSIDERS ORGANIZED FOR UNITY AND LIBERATION — $625,000 · PhilanthropySEATTLE FOUNDATION — $500,000 · PhilanthropyWashington Progress Fund — $400,000 · PhilanthropyEAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $400,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CENTER FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH AND SOCIAL CHANGE INC — $2,171,000 · Arts & CultureMIJENTE SUPPORT COMMITTEE — $1,241,100 · Arts & CultureBOREALIS PHILANTHROPY — $1,000,000 · Arts & CultureFAMILY ACTION NETWORK MOVEMENT INC — $920,000 · Arts & CultureSEATTLE ARTS AND LECTURES — $875,514 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL TRUST FOR LOCAL NEWS — $635,000 · Arts & CultureAPPALSHOP INC — $420,000 · Arts & CultureRadio Bilingue Inc — $377,500 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL URBAN INDIAN FAMILY COALITION — $375,000 · Arts & Culture
Civil Rights$31,121,917Other$62,150,434Human Services$23,825,650Community Improvement$20,797,956Environment$11,451,150Philanthropy$9,302,000Arts & Culture$8,015,114

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTIDES CENTER — $4,419,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION — $4,181,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT EDUCATION FUND — $2,438,750 over 6y, 11% of budgetSOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC — $2,388,750 over 6y, 16% of budgetKENTUCKY COALITION INC — $2,365,000 over 5y, 26% of budgetFLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC — $2,173,750 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH AND SOCIAL CHANGE INC — $2,171,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetMAJORITYACTION — $2,150,000 over 2y, 40% of budgetINNER-CITY MUSLIM ACTION NETWORK — $2,085,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT — $1,960,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $1,898,650 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetFlorida Immigrant Coalition Inc — $1,880,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetCONGREGATIONS ORGANIZED FOR PROPHETIC ENGAGEMENT — $1,860,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA INC — $1,845,000 over 5y, 7.3% of budgetCOMMUNITIES UNITED — $1,820,000 over 5y, 19% of budgetTHE HANA CENTER — $1,820,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetNative Americans in Philanthropy — $1,785,000 over 5y, 9.2% of budgetFREEDOM INC — $1,700,500 over 4y, 12% of budgetLA UNION DEL PUEBLO ENTERO — $1,695,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetCROSSROADS FUND INC — $1,672,500 over 3y, 23% of budgetAmalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc — $1,670,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFOOT SOLDIERS PARK INC — $1,666,667 over 2y, 82% of budgetTENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION — $1,640,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetSOUTHWEST GA PROJECT FOR COMMUNITY EDUCATION INC — $1,539,812 over 5y, 34% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $1,315,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOLOR OF CHANGEORG EDUCATION FUND — $1,270,200 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetGRASSROOTS LEADERSHIP INC — $1,263,750 over 6y, 23% of budgetPOWER COALITION FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE — $1,256,250 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetFAITH IN ACTION NETWORK — $1,250,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetMIJENTE SUPPORT COMMITTEE — $1,241,100 over 6y, 11% of budgetSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT — $1,215,000 over 5y, 26% of budgetPUBLIC ALLIES INC — $1,207,500 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetMORE PERFECT UNION FOUNDATION — $1,200,000 over 3y, 8.5% of budgetPUENTE HUMAN RIGHTS MOVEMENT — $1,182,500 over 6y, 26% of budgetSOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO — $1,170,000 over 5y, 25% of budgetOrganizing Neighborhoods For Equality Northside — $1,120,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetTHE OLE EDUCATION FUND — $1,095,000 over 5y, 9.3% of budgetKC TENANTS — $1,074,300 over 3y, 33% of budgetKenwood Oakland Community Organization — $1,070,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetCOMMUNITY COALITION FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT — $1,060,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC — $1,045,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetGeorgia Strategic Alliance for New — $1,032,500 over 5y, 27% of budgetLogan Square Neighborhood Association — $1,000,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetCALIFORNIA CALLS EDUCATION FUND — $1,000,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetLEADERS IGNITING TRANSFORMATION EDUCATION FUND INC — $1,000,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetBOREALIS PHILANTHROPY — $1,000,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFLORIDA RIGHTS RESTORATION COALITION — $1,000,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetALABAMA ARISE — $995,000 over 5y, 44% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS ORGANIZING PROJECT EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERNERS ON NEW GROUND INC ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR ECONOMIC RESEARCH AND SOCIAL CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAJORITYACTION ↗
  • Who funds INNER-CITY MUSLIM ACTION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA CENTER FOR EMPOWERMENT ↗
  • Who funds HIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Florida Immigrant Coalition Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATIONS ORGANIZED FOR PROPHETIC ENGAGEMENT ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES UNITED ↗
  • Who funds THE HANA CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Native Americans in Philanthropy ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM INC ↗
  • Who funds LA UNION DEL PUEBLO ENTERO ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOT SOLDIERS PARK INC ↗
  • Who funds TENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST GA PROJECT FOR COMMUNITY EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds COLOR OF CHANGEORG EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds GRASSROOTS LEADERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds POWER COALITION FOR EQUITY AND JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds FAITH IN ACTION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds MIJENTE SUPPORT COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC ALLIES INC ↗
  • Who funds MORE PERFECT UNION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PUENTE HUMAN RIGHTS MOVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds SOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

NEO Philanthropy IncAmalgamated Charitabl…Common Counsel Founda…Borealis PhilanthropyProteus Fund IncWindward FundThe Satterberg Founda…Wellspring Philanthro…Surdna Foundation IncMovement Strategy Cen…Center for Community …Mary Reynolds Babcock…
NEO Philanthropy IncNY114.1× affinity115 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: NEO Philanthropy Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Common Counsel Foundation · Borealis Philanthropy · Proteus Fund Inc · Windward Fund · The Satterberg Foundation Inc · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Surdna Foundation Inc · Movement Strategy Center · Center for Community Change · Mary Reynolds Babcock Foundation Incorporated

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Marguerite Casey Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Native American Youth and Family Center — 23% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • CRAFT3 — 1% of income from government
  • Hope Community Center Inc — 0% of income from government
  • University of Maryland Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
61report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 842 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home