Loading…
Loading…
California · Nonprofit
Pollen Initiative (California) is funded by 9 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $332,000 in grants to it, the largest being REVA AND DAVID LOGAN FOUNDATION ($125,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
Pollen Initiative is funded by 9 grantmakers reporting $332k in grants to it.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,994 arts & culture nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
$5k from 1 funders in 2025, up from $327k and 9 in 2024.
From the IRS filings of Pollen Initiative’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
Pollen Initiative leans on a few funders — its largest provides 38% of grant income and the top three 83%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2024 38% · 2025 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
Pollen Initiative draws 94% of its grant income from funders outside California — its reputation reaches beyond the state, across 8 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 9 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
75% of spending goes to programs.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2025–2025), and the filings of 9funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing