Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Solidaire Network Inc

Solidaire Network nurtures relationships within social movements to create regenerative systems rooted in love and justice.

$9.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
135
Grants FY2025still arriving
29
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.

Civil Rights$23MArts & Culture$4.0MHuman Services$3.8MEnvironment$3.8MCommunity Improvement$3.6MPhilanthropy$2.7MCrime & Legal$2.7MPublic Benefit$2.4MOther$0
02FY2025 · 135 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 135 grants below total $7,912,942 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $9,326,217 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,413,275 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k47 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k86 grants · $6.8M
$50,000
Median grant
29
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Taproot Earth$200,000
Tides Center$200,000
Highlander Research & Education Center$200,000
Tewa Women United$150,000
Black Farmer Fund Inc$150,000
National Black Food and Justice Alliance$150,000
Native American Community Board$150,000
Chico Feminist Women's Health Centers$150,000
Indigenous Women Rising$150,000
Indigenous Environmental Network$150,000
NDN Collective$138,080
NEO Philanthropy Inc$120,000
Community Ready Corps Inc$100,000
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation$100,000
Center for Empowered Politics Education Fund$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $6.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Northeast Native Network of Kinship and Healing Inc: $125k → 8%Alianza Nacional de Campesinas Inc: $200k → 10%Tides Center: $75k → 10%Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples: $100k → 18%Jakara Movement: $65k → 19%African Communities Together: $80k → 28%Chainbreaker Collective: $65k → 12%La Plazita Institute: $250k → 14%Tewa Women United: $100k → 18%Monsoon Asians & Pacific Islanders in Solidarity: $100k → 10%One Love Global: $70k → 9%The Knights and Orchids Society: $100k → 33%Freedom Inc: $100k → 10%Hmong American Women's Association: $80k → 17%Barred Business Foundation: $85k → 14%United for a New Economy for Colorado Homes for All: $100k → 10%Ramapough Culture and Land Foundation: $80k → 6%Native American Community Board: $150k → 22%Native Women's Society of the Great Plains: $80k → 25%Community Ready Corps Inc: $100k → 24%Tides Center: $75k → 10%TODEC Legal Center: $50k → 11%Seventh Generation Fund for Indigenous Peoples: $100k → 18%Chainbreaker Collective: $50k → 12%Monsoon Asians & Pacific Islanders in Solidarity: $65k → 10%Freedom Inc: $50k → 10%Hmong American Women's Association: $55k → 17%Barred Business Foundation: $60k → 14%United for a New Economy for Colorado Homes for All: $50k → 10%Ramapough Culture and Land Foundation: $55k → 6%Tides Center: $75k → 10%PANASD: $75k → 11%Tewa Women United: $150k → 12%Barred Business Foundation CO: $60k → 14%Tides Center: $60k → 10%Transgender Advocates Knowledgeable Empowering (TAKE Resource Center): $115k → 16%Tides Center: $55k → 10%SisterSong Inc: $100k → 13%Cooperation Jackson: $100k → 23%Equity and Transformation: $65k → 14%Equity and Transformation: $100k → 14%We the People of Detroit: $100k → 21%Southeast Immigrant Rights Network: $55k → 13%Transgender Gender Variant Intersex Justice Project: $100k → 10%Tides Center: $300k → 10%Tides Center for Palestine Legal: $80k → 10%SPM Disability Justice Fund: $60k → 10%Black Organizing Project: $100k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
DC
HI
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Solidaire Network Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Solidaire Network Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$41M · 137 repeat orgs$11M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +8% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

137 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2025, 86 since wound down; 63 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

137
128

Total granted

$41M
$7.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
0%

Still filing today

90%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsArts & CultureEnvironmentEducationCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +17%
  • NEO Philanthropy Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +17%
  • NM
    NATIVE MOVEMENT
    3× · 2021–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • GF
    Groundswell Fund
    one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue -25%
  • PI
    Polaris Institute USA
    one grant, 2021 · $385k · revenue -81%
  • TJ
    TRANS JUSTICE FUNDING PROJECT
    one grant, 2022 · $313k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
2
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
3
Justice Funders

Serve as a partner, educator, and guide for philanthropy in reimagining practices that advance a thriving and just world.

—
4
Right to Democracy Project

Advance democracy, equity, and self-determination in U.S. territories through participatory advocacy, narrative and cultural change, and ecosystem building.

Civil Rights
5
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
6
Black in Action Collective

Black in Action Collective exists to build Black political power to transform systems and radically reimagine what is possible for ourselves, our families, and our communities

Civil Rights
7
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
8
Communities Rise

Communities Rise fosters movements to build power in communities impacted by systemic oppression. To create an equitable system, we pursue cross-sector collaboration, and provide capacity building and legal services for community…

Crime & Legal
9
Wepower

We activate community power to redesign social systems to be just and equitable for all through (1) developing and supporting leaders and organizations and (2) leading campaigns, coalitions, and innovative initiatives.

Community Improvement
10
Forward Justice Action Network

Forward Justice Action Network is a nonprofit with the purpose to engage in educational and advocacy activities to promote political and grassroots support for public policies that advance racial social and economic justice in North…

Human Services
11
Center for Racial and Gender E Nfp

Workers Rights

Civil Rights
12
Chicago United for Equity

Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Undocublack Network Inc and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Middle East Peace. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyImmigrant Worker SupportJewish Community Organizati…Women & Girls Leadership De…Christian Missionary Organi…Lgbtq+ Community SupportFaith-Based Social ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Community FoundationsCommunity Arts CentersCommunity FoundationsMilitary Veterans SupportYouth Development ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesYouth Mentoring ProgramsPregnancy Support ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Community College Foundatio…Local Food System Organizat…Dance Arts OrganizationsEnvironmental Conservation …Policy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%9%<5yr14%30%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%1%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%4%<5yr14%21%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%4%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%13/337
the rest of the field
13%
240,383/1,819,228

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

298 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 298 of the 337 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

17
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
74
Early backer (in before they grew)
288/298
Grantees still filing
151/298
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PROJECT SOUTH INC — $1,015,000 · OtherCenter for Third World Organizing — $800,000 · OtherNEO Philanthropy Inc — $1,334,880 · OtherNEO Philanthropy IncTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC — $1,065,000 · Other+89 more — $17,414,186 · Other+89 moreTIDES CENTER — $1,283,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTERSEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC — $1,005,000 · Human ServicesSEVENTH GENERATIO…Alianza Nacional de Campesinas Inc — $400,000 · Human ServicesCOOPERATION JACKSON OF MISSISSIPPI — $315,000 · Human Services+30 more — $4,892,500 · Human Services+30 moreRIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE — $1,715,000 · Civil RightsRIGHT TO THE CIT…BVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC — $525,000 · Civil RightsBVM CAPACITY BUI…DEFENDING RIGHTS AND DISSENT INC — $515,000 · Civil RightsDEFENDING RIGHTS…THE RECONCILIATION CENTER INC — $491,500 · Civil RightsTHE RECONCILIATI…MISSISSIPPI VOTES — $375,000 · Civil RightsBOLD TRAINING INSTITUTE INC — $335,000 · Civil RightsTHE SIKH COALITION — $325,000 · Civil RightsONE FAIR WAGE INC — $307,000 · Civil RightsTransgender Law Center — $300,000 · Civil RightsAnti Police-Terror Project Inc — $266,000 · Civil Rights+17 more — $2,204,654 · Civil Rights+17 moreALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC — $715,000 · Arts & CultureALLIED ME…Alternate RootsInc — $425,000 · Arts & CultureAlternate…FRACTURED ATLAS INC — $415,000 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED…DANCERS GROUP — $360,000 · Arts & CultureDANCERS G…FREE PRESS — $276,000 · Arts & CultureFREE PRES…The Bottom — $230,000 · Arts & CultureThe Botto…U B W INC A/K/A URBAN BUSH WOMEN INC — $209,000 · Arts & CultureKOIHONUA — $200,000 · Arts & CultureCULTURETRUST GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $200,000 · Arts & CultureACORN Center For Restoration & Freedom — $185,000 · Arts & CultureBLACK IN APPALACHIA — $180,000 · Arts & CultureMemphis Artists for Change — $175,000 · Arts & CultureMISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR CULTURAL PRODUCTION — $155,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $485,000 · Arts & Culture+4 morePROTEUS FUND INC — $765,000 · EducationINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK — $630,000 · EducationSISTERREACH — $510,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $442,500 · EducationALABAMA JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $325,000 · EducationVILLAGE MICRO FUND — $280,000 · EducationGrassroots Power Project — $200,000 · EducationBLUEPRINT NORTH CAROLINA — $200,000 · Education+3 more — $245,000 · EducationHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $1,538,000 · EnvironmentTaproot Earth — $400,000 · EnvironmentHONOR THE EARTH — $345,000 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUND — $300,000 · EnvironmentUrban Tilth — $280,000 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $230,000 · EnvironmentSOUTHERN CONSERVATION PARTNERS INC — $212,000 · Environment+3 more — $290,000 · EnvironmentNATIVE MOVEMENT — $1,100,000 · Community ImprovementBLACK FARMER FUND INC — $600,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION — $600,000 · Community ImprovementNDN COLLECTIVE INC — $388,080 · Community ImprovementINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC — $355,000 · Community ImprovementKENTUCKY CIVIC ENGAGEMENT TABLE INC — $150,000 · Community Improvement+2 more — $145,000 · Community Improvement
Other$21,629,066Human Services$7,895,500Civil Rights$7,359,154Arts & Culture$4,210,000Education$3,597,500Environment$3,595,000Community Improvement$3,338,080

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRIGHT TO THE CITY ALLIANCE — $1,715,000 over 5y, 6.5% of budgetHIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC — $1,538,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetNEO Philanthropy Inc — $1,334,880 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $1,283,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIVE MOVEMENT — $1,100,000 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC — $1,065,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetPROJECT SOUTH INC — $1,015,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetSEVENTH GENERATION FUND FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES INC — $1,005,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetCenter for Third World Organizing — $800,000 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetPROTEUS FUND INC — $765,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC — $715,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetINDIGENOUS ENVIRONMENTAL NETWORK — $630,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetGLOBAL FUND FOR WOMEN INC — $600,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetBLACK FARMER FUND INC — $600,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetCOMMON COUNSEL FOUNDATION — $600,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHOUSAND CURRENTS — $590,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC — $525,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetDEFENDING RIGHTS AND DISSENT INC — $515,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetSISTERREACH — $510,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetGroundswell Fund — $500,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE RECONCILIATION CENTER INC — $491,500 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $450,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $442,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAlternate RootsInc — $425,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetARCHCITY DEFENDERS — $415,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC — $415,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetTaproot Earth — $400,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetPARCELERAS AFROCARIBENAS POR LA TRANSFORM BARRIAL — $400,000 over 3y, 65% of budgetAlianza Nacional de Campesinas Inc — $400,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetNorth Carolina Association of Black Lawyer Land Loss Prevention Projec — $400,000 over 3y, 9.9% of budgetNDN COLLECTIVE INC — $388,080 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPolaris Institute USA — $385,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetTIDES ADVOCACY — $382,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMISSISSIPPI VOTES — $375,000 over 5y, 15% of budgetDANCERS GROUP — $360,000 over 4y, 7.8% of budgetFeminist Womens Health Center Inc — $355,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC — $355,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetHONOR THE EARTH — $345,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetBOLD TRAINING INSTITUTE INC — $335,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetALABAMA JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $325,000 over 5y, 63% of budgetTHE SIKH COALITION — $325,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetWESPAC FOUNDATION INC — $315,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetCOOPERATION JACKSON OF MISSISSIPPI — $315,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetBLACK BELT JUSTICE CENTER — $315,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetONE FAIR WAGE INC — $307,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetTransgender Law Center — $300,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $300,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC — $300,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitabl…Borealis PhilanthropyCommon Counsel Founda…Proteus Fund IncNEO Philanthropy IncGroundswell FundTides FoundationMs Foundation for Wom…Wellspring Philanthro…Windward FundTides CenterRsf Social Finance Inc
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC137.4× affinity167 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Borealis Philanthropy · Common Counsel Foundation · Proteus Fund Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Groundswell Fund · Tides Foundation · Ms Foundation for Women Inc · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Windward Fund · Tides Center · Rsf Social Finance Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Solidaire Network Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 100%
  • Ironbound Community Corporation — 100% of income from government
  • Northeast Native Network of Kinship and — 44% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
40report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 337 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home