Skip to content

Michigan · Nonprofit

Citizens for Prison Reform

Citizens for Prison Reform (Michigan) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $474,001 to it, the largest being NATIONAL RELIGIOUS CAMPAIGN AGAINST TORTURE ($203,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$351k
Funders on record
7
Grants received
$474k
Net assets
$81k
4/7 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 80%
01What it does

What Citizens for Prison Reform does

Mission

To promote and contribute to the education of families and those affected by crime and punishment.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Unlock the Box educates and brings awareness to the use of solitary confinement and conditions of confinement with the goal to limit who is held in solitary and length of time. It works to bring systemic transformation by storytelling of those directly impacted, sharing analyzed data and highlights the need for accountability, transparency and oversight.

    $43,544 spent$48,000 earned by the program
    19% of program spending
  2. The Family Participatory Program (FPP) trains family advocates to support families of the incarcerated to navigate the system, provide support meetings and share their stories to drive change. FPP assists with technology, medical, mental health and other barriers to protect human dignity, and connects with individuals and their families through informational posters in all prison waiting rooms and common areas on units.

    $130,494 spent$161,500 earned by the program
    56% of program spending
  3. The FIRST (Family Information, Resource & Support Team) Hub Participatory Defense Movement supports families and individuals navigating the criminal legal system, empowering them to seek diversion and positively impact case outcomes, keeping more people with their families and in the community.

    $41,207 spent$33,500 earned by the program
    18% of program spending
  4. Administrative programming - revenue of $26,000, expenses of $14,468 Restorative Justice Initiative - revenue of $3,820, expenses of $3,916

    $18,384 spent$29,820 earned by the program
    8% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $233,629.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2020, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2020, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20202020 Revenue 100 ($63k) Expenses 100 ($34k) Net assets 100 ($40k)2021 Revenue 99 ($62k) Expenses 210 ($72k) Net assets 75 ($30k)2022 Revenue 113 ($71k) Expenses 217 ($74k) Net assets 67 ($27k)2023 Revenue 425 ($267k) Expenses 312 ($107k) Net assets 467 ($187k)2024 Revenue 261 ($164k) Expenses 830 ($285k) Net assets 166 ($66k)2025 Revenue 558 ($351k) Expenses 980 ($336k) Net assets 203 ($81k)
202020212022202320242025
Revenue (558)Expenses (980)Net assets (203)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $27k to $187k (+598%).

$40k
$30k
$27k
$187k
$67k
$83k
202020212022202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2024 15% · 2025 6%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

100% of Citizens for Prison Reform’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (94% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,778 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 6 reported years ran a deficit.

$29k
’20
−$10k
’21
−$3k
’22
$160k
’23
−$121k
’24
$15k
’25
3.0
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Lois Pullano

Executive Director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

202320242025
Listed91011
Joined·+1+2
No longer listed·01
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 2 funders to 4 funders, grant income rose $50k → $149k.

3 of 7 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 37% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of Citizens for Prison Reform’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

Citizens for Prison Reform leans on a few funders — its largest provides 43% of grant income and the top three 80%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund Citizens for Prison Reform.

43%
largest funder
80%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 60% · 2021 99% · 2022 70% · 2023 39% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

Citizens for Prison Reform draws 90% of its grant income from funders outside Michigan, across 4 states in all.

MN
MI
CA
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’20
’21
’22
’23
Michigan out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $176k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

Citizens for Prison Reform has grown faster than three-quarters of the 1,547 crime & legal nonprofits its size.

Operating margin4% · below the median
Months of reserve3.0mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)41% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,547 crime & legal nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like Citizens for Prison Reform

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Michigan

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

69% of spending goes to programs.

Program 69%Management 22%Fundraising 8%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

75%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for Citizens for Prison Reform: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds Citizens for Prison Reform?
Citizens for Prison Reform (Michigan) receives grants from 7 organizations whose IRS filings report $474,001 to it, the largest being NATIONAL RELIGIOUS CAMPAIGN AGAINST TORTURE ($203,000). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does Citizens for Prison Reform have?
IRS filings report 7 organizations giving $474,001 in grants to Citizens for Prison Reform, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of Citizens for Prison Reform?
NATIONAL RELIGIOUS CAMPAIGN AGAINST TORTURE is the largest funder on record, with $203,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like Citizens for Prison Reform find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Michigan. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Citizens for Prison Reform →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2020–2025), and the filings of 7 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing