How much did ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

Education$7.2MHuman Services$6.1MArts & Culture$5.1MHealth$2.9MFood & Nutrition$2.1MPhilanthropy$1.7MAnimals$1.4MCommunity Improvement$1.2MHousing & Shelter$1.1MOther$13M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

mentorme awardacf competitivemethodist churchpeggy cavett-waldendonor-adviseddonor pass-thrudonor pass-through

2019

donor-advisedpass-throughswift distributionacf ewdold studentsrural healthwaste

2020

acf educationdonor-advisedbrighter futureeconomic vitalitydistrict concentratedconcentrated promotionpromotion design

2021

wwfhealth literacydonor-advisedacf educationworld'sadvancementpractitioners

2022

advised distributiondonor-advised passthroughspendabledonor advisedcircle advisedfosteringgiveaway recipient

2023

ojo sarcogolden spreadspread ruralrural frontierrebuildingpuebloscnm ingenuity

2024

social sectorcelebratesthrivingballoon museummexicos socialchildren childrenguided

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 245 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k46 grants · $314k
$10k–50k171 grants · $3.5M
$50k–250k26 grants · $2.2M
$250k+2 grants · $928k

$16,000

Median grant

States reached

$161M

Total assets

Largest grants

UNM FOUNDATION$663,352
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS INC$264,389
ALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM FOUNDATION$177,337
THREE SISTERS KITCHEN$170,000
NEW MEXICO PHILHARMONIC$159,360
ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK$130,199
UNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL NEW MEXICO$107,500
ROSWELL MUSEUM ART CENTER FOUNDATION$101,000
CNM FOUNDATION$86,300
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO$85,000
HORIZONS ALBUQUERQUE$78,500
OPERA SOUTHWEST$78,168
ALBUQUERQUE REGIONAL ECONOMIC ALLIANCE$75,000
THRIVE IN SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO$75,000
SARANAM LLC$74,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$38M · 323 repeat orgs$4.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.

323 repeat relationships — 195 still active in FY2024, 128 since wound down; 40 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

323

299

Total granted

$38M

$3.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%

+40%

Still filing today

89%

74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $830k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

UNM SCHOOL OF LAW
8× · 2017–2024 · $3.1M · revenue +31%
NM
NEW MEXICO PHILHARMONIC
8× · 2017–2024 · $973k · revenue +39%
PP
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS INC
8× · 2017–2024 · $824k · revenue +16%

Funded once

NA
NATIONAL ATAXIA FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $234k · revenue +181%
NM
NEW MEXICO BOYS AND GIRLS RANCH FOUNDATION
one grant, 2022 · $234k · revenue -69%
MC
MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA
one grant, 2022 · $234k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

New Mexico Ballet Company

To create and promote professional and innovative dance productions for New Mexico audiences while providing the highest caliber of education and training for young artists in the community.

Arts & Culture

Unm Rainforest Innovations

Supporting the university of new mexico as the source of innovation management, patent prosecution and licensing of technologies developed at the university of new mexico.

Education

New Mexico Broadcasters Association

Education

Nmsu Alamogordo

—

Taos Art Museum

—

The Helene Worlitzer Foundation of New Mexico

—

Association of Chinese-American Engineers and Scientists of New Mexico

Science & Tech

Bold Futures Nm

Bold futures nm leads policy change, research, place-based organizing, and culture shift by and for women and people of color in new mexico. bold futures nm centers the lived experiences and expertise of those most impacted by an issue,…

Human Services

New Mexico Voices for Children

To improve the status, well-being and racial/ethnic equity of new mexico's children, families, and communities in the areas of health, education, and economic security by promoting public policies through credible research and effective…

Civil Rights

New Mexico Humanities Council

The new mexico humanities council (nmhc) supports and conducts innovative and imaginative programs throughout the state that lead to a greater understanding of, and motivate interest in, the richness of our human experience and heritage.…

—

Santa Fe Concert Association

Performance santa fe (psf) is dedicated to support performing arts by bringing world-class performing artists to santa fe and providing excellent arts education to the youth in the community.

—

Felines & Friends New Mexico

Felines & friends is a "second chance" rescue and placement organization focusing on providing vet care and socialization for cats and kittens who might not otherwise find homes through animal shelters. since 2002, we have placed over…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Community Development and the most unlike its peers is Big Brothers Big Sisters Mountain. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%11/660

the rest of the field

11%

963/8,980

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

569 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

196

Early backer (in before they grew)

548/569

Grantees still filing

428/569

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$16,823,765Education$7,244,937Human Services$6,091,398Arts & Culture$5,093,130Health$2,914,511Food & Nutrition$2,080,249Philanthropy$1,725,351

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marshall L and Perrine D McCuneNM175.5× affinity108 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marshall L and Perrine D McCune · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Pnm Resources Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · New Mexico Community Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson · Thornburg Foundation · Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation · The Frost Foundation · Los Alamos National Laboratory · New Mexico Community Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

4get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PENNIES FOR THE HOMELESS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~7 months of operating runway; revenue held over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

high risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.

Legal standing

medium risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 300371748 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on PENNIES FOR THE HOMELESS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 7 months of cash on hand.
FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 58% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Albuquerque Community Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Albuquerque Community Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

569 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Albuquerque Community Foundation?

More from the funding graph

ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

569 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Albuquerque Community Foundation?

More from the funding graph