· Private foundation
Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 52% of MARSHALL L AND PERRINE D MCCUNE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k44 grants · $155k
- $10k–50k90 grants · $2.6M
- $50k–250k5 grants · $440k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HISPANIC FEDERATION INC | $200,000 |
| NEW MEXICO CENTER ON LAW AND POVERTY | $60,000 |
| LA SEMILLA FOOD CENTER | $60,000 |
| KESHET DANCE COMPANY | $60,000 |
| SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FISCAL SPONSOR FOR NEW MEXICO LOCAL NEWS FUND | $60,000 |
| THREE SISTERS KITCHEN | $40,000 |
| SEMILLA PROJECT | $40,000 |
| LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY FOUNDATION | $38,000 |
| THE NM BLACK CAT CULTURAL ENTERPRISES FISCAL SPONSOR FOR VIIIZON ACADEMY | $35,000 |
| NEW MEXICO FARMERS' MARKETING ASSOCIATION | $35,000 |
| INDIGENOUS LIFE WAYS FISCAL SPONSOR FOR MCKINLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH ALLIANCE | $35,000 |
| NEW MEXICO ALLIANCE OF HEALTH COUNCILS | $35,000 |
| NACA INSPIRED SCHOOLS NETWORK FISCAL SPONSOR FOR INDIGENOUS FARM HUB | $35,000 |
| 501(C)PA | $35,000 |
| NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER | $35,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +65% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
233 repeat relationships — 86 still active in FY2024, 147 since wound down; 49 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $941k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NMNEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER7× · 2018–2024 · $340k · revenue +133%
- FFFUTURE FOCUSED EDUCATION5× · 2020–2024 · $305k · revenue +507%
- NMNEW MEXICO CENTER ON LAW AND POVERTY7× · 2018–2024 · $300k · revenue +162%
Funded once
- NMNEW MEXICO FOUNDATION FISCAL SPONSOR FOR NATIVE AMERICAN RECOVERY FUND ZONEone grant, 2023 · $650k
- WEWOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY TEAM CORPgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $374k · revenue +250%
- FFFUTURE FOCUSED EDUCATION FATPIPE ABQ COWORKING SPACEone grant, 2019 · $112k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.
Educate the public on forest conservation issues in New Mexico
Bold futures nm leads policy change, research, place-based organizing, and culture shift by and for women and people of color in new mexico. bold futures nm centers the lived experiences and expertise of those most impacted by an issue,…
To protect new mexico's water and acequias, grow healthy food for local families and communities, and to honor new mexico's cultural heritage.
To provide leadership, build partnerships and enable the innovation necessary to reestablish local food and energy production, strengthen educational systems and establish placemaking in our communities while promoting northeastern new…
CAFE is a faith based Non Profit community organization with the purpose of training and organizing low and moderate income families to shape public policy.
Through a variety of media created by emerging and established artists, the center for contemporary arts of santa fe, inc. (center) presents the arts of our time as vital elements in the cultural dialogue in santa fe and throughout new…
To address climate change by investing in New Mexico projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions climate impacts and energy cost burdens prioritizing underserved communities.
The santa fe botanical garden celebrates, cultivates and conserves the rich botanical heritage and biodiversity of our region. in partnership with nature, we demonstrate our commitment through education, science, conservation, community…
Social and emotional learning (SEL) is integral to human development and education. Through reliable developmental relationships, young people learn who they are and imagine who they might become as healthy, contributing adults in their…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Center On Law and Poverty and the most unlike its peers is Nanbe Tewa Language Program. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
280 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 280 of the 579 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds 516 Arts ↗
- Who funds PROSPERITY WORKS ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY TEAM CORP ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds New Mexico Resiliency Alliance ↗
- Who funds FUTURE FOCUSED EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO CENTER ON LAW AND POVERTY ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE NEW MEXICO FARMERS MARKETING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds RIO GRANDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST RESEARCH & INFORMATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds CENTER OF SOUTHWEST CULTURE INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds Keshet Dance Company ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds THREE SISTERS KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds CHAINBREAKER COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds 501(C)PA ↗
- Who funds Little Globe Inc ↗
- Who funds MOVING ARTS ESPANOLA INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds EXPLORA SCIENCE CENTER & CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ALBUQUERQUE INC ↗
- Who funds GROUNDWORKS NEW MEXICO KRISTI DORR ↗
- Who funds LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE ↗
- Who funds TAOS LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds KERES CHILDREN'S LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds ENLACE COMUNITARIO ↗
- Who funds LA SEMILLA FOOD CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE SAVILA COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO CAREGIVERS COALITION ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR CIVIC POLICY ↗
- Who funds THE TRANSGENDER RESOURCE CENTER OF NEW MEXICO ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · New Mexico Community Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Thornburg Foundation · The Frost Foundation · Brindle Foundation · The Taos Community Foundation Inc · New Mexico Humanities Council
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.