Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Community foundation

New Mexico Community Foundation

To steward community resources, build partnerships, and create opportunities that transform lives throughout new mexico.

$3.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
63
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$265k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Human Services$3.2MEducation$2.6MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.7MArts & Culture$1.4MEnvironment$1.4MPhilanthropy$1.1MCivil Rights$943kHealth$701kOther$0
02FY2024 · 63 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 63 grants below total $3,023,626 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,234,100 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $210,474 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k33 grants · $811k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $1.9M
  • $250k+1 grant · $265k
$30,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$61M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY FOUNDATION$265,000
OLE EDUCATION FUND$181,497
NEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN$140,000
SANTA CLARA PUEBLO$100,000
CONSERVATION LEGACY$100,000
PUEBLO OF POJOAQUE$100,000
SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT$100,000
PUEBLO OF SAN FELIPE$100,000
NATIVE WOMEN LEAD$100,000
JICARILLA APACHE NATION$100,000
NMF YAKANAL NATIVE AMERICAN RECOVERY ZONE GRANT$100,000
INDIGENOUS LIFE WAYS$100,000
TREES WATER & PEOPLE$100,000
EARTH CARE$100,000
AMERICANS FOR INDIAN OPPORTUNITY (AIO)$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Collective Medicine: $20k → 16%HUMANITARIAN OUTREACH FOR MIGRANT EMOTIONAL HEALTH (HOME): $25k → 5%SPIRIT OF HIDALGO: $10k → 25%Rural Utah Project Education: $30k → 8%Little Castle Learning & Dev: $10k → 13%Valencia Shelter Services: $10k → 19%ECHO Inc: $15k → 22%Deming Silver Linings: $10k → 26%DEMING SILVER LININGS: $10k → 26%LA COSECHA COMMUNITY SUPPORTED AGRICULTURE: $20k → 14%EL REFUGIO INC: $18k → 20%El Refugio Inc: $17k → 20%El Refugio Inc: $11k → 20%NW New Mexico First Born: $14k → 22%NOT FORGOTTEN OUTREACH: $10k → 18%El Refugio Inc: $10k → 20%HEALTHY NATIVE COMMUNITIES PARTNERS: $25k → 22%EL REFUGIO INC: $6k → 20%Cruces Creatives: $8k → 23%Las Cumbres Community Service: $75k → 18%FREE FLOW NM: $10k → 12%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $45k → 18%Battered Families Services: $66k → 32%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $13k → 18%NM COMUNIDADES EN ACCION Y DE FE: $66k → 23%BATTERED FAMILIES SERVICES INC: $10k → 32%LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES: $10k → 18%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NM: $54k → 23%AVENUES EARLY CHILDHOOD SERVICES I: $10k → 32%NM COMUNIDADES EN ACCION Y DE FE: $41k → 23%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $20k → 12%Luciente: $13k → 18%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $28k → 14%COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SOUTHERN: $27k → 23%COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO: $20k → 23%ALTA MIRA SPECIALIZED FAMILY SERVICES: $11k → 14%Alta Mira Specialized Family: $11k → 14%ALTA MIRA SPECIALIZED FAMILY SERVIC: $11k → 14%Alta Mira Specialized Family: $11k → 14%ARCHDIOCESE OF SANTA FE: $8k → 14%American Red Cross: $25k → 14%EL CENTRO DE IGUALDAD Y DERECHOS: $41k → 14%WESST CORP: $15k → 12%ENCUENTRO: $35k → 14%WESST CORP: $15k → 12%STEELBRIDGE MINISTRIES: $7k → 14%Fort Defiance Housing Corpora: $20k → 14%Indigenous Rights Center: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
NV
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
AZ
NM
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of New Mexico Community Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

New Mexico Community Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 106 repeat orgs$3.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.

106 repeat relationships — 42 still active in FY2024, 64 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

106
126

Total granted

$12M
$2.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+15%

Still filing today

64%
73%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $932k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHealthEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NM
    NEW MEXICO FUND FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS
    5× · 2018–2023 · $692k · revenue +98% · 52% of their budget
  • EC
    ENLACE COMUNITARIO
    6× · 2018–2023 · $450k · revenue +86%
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER
    4× · 2021–2024 · $288k · revenue +192%

Funded once

  • SJ
    San Juan Citizens Alliancegraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +134%
  • TS
    THE SANTA FE OPERA
    one grant, 2019 · $80k · revenue +15%
  • NL
    NONPROFIT LEGAL SERVICES OF UTAH
    one grant, 2022 · $75k · revenue -49%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Power New Mexico
Community Improvement
2
Comunidad De Colores

Our mission is to promote health equity in Northern New Mexico by improving quality and access to health services regardless of one's insurance status or ability to pay.

Health
3
Bold Futures Nm

Bold futures nm leads policy change, research, place-based organizing, and culture shift by and for women and people of color in new mexico. bold futures nm centers the lived experiences and expertise of those most impacted by an issue,…

Human Services
4
Leadership New Mexico

Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.

Arts & Culture
5
Law Access New Mexico

Provide respectful high quality legal advice, counsel, brief services and referral to low-income New Mexicans and help remove barriers to the civil justice system.

—
6
Northeastern New Mexico Educational Foundation Inc

To provide leadership, build partnerships and enable the innovation necessary to reestablish local food and energy production, strengthen educational systems and establish placemaking in our communities while promoting northeastern new…

Arts & Culture
7
Sovereign Energy

Sovereign Energy builds the individual and collective power of Southwest Pueblos and Tribes to lead the way toward a just, interdependent, and sustainable energy future.

Environment
8
Casa Partners 4NMKIDS Inc

The casa program is a community-based program that recruits, trains and supports citizen-volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in courtrooms and communities. the organization serves children in…

Civil Rights
9
Northern New Mexicans Protecting Land Water and Rights Inc

Northern new mexicans protecting land water and rights strives to lessen the stress of neighborhood tensions due to lack of information and fair representation. by providing an organization whose main goal is to unite and empower the…

—
10
Groundworks New Mexico Kristi Dorr

Groundworks new mexicos mission is to connect, strengthen, and advocate for new mexicos social sector while unleashing its full potential. our core values are racial equity, collaboration, community, and impact. groundworks new mexico…

Education
11
New Mexico Rural Electric Cooperative Association Inc

The mission of the new mexico rural electric cooperatives (nmrec) is to advance protect and advocate member interests.

—
12
Vida Mejor Capital Inc

Primary exempt purpose: at vida mejor capital, our mission is to empower new mexican small businesses through technical assistance and equitable access to capital, with a dedicated focus on advancing food justice, food sovereignty, and…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Center On Law and Poverty and the most unlike its peers is Taos Pueblo Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%4%<5yr14%11%5–10yr20%27%10–20yr20%27%20–35yr15%24%35–55yr14%7%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%5%<5yr14%10%5–10yr20%24%10–20yr20%36%20–35yr15%21%35–55yr14%5%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%9/255
the rest of the field
11%
4,541/40,171

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

193 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 193 of the 258 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
51
Early backer (in before they grew)
182/193
Grantees still filing
120/193
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY — $862,075 · OtherNEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITYNEW MEXICO FUND FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS — $692,025 · OtherNEW MEXICO FUND FOR WOMEN AND GIRLSSANTA CLARA PUEBLO — $348,850 · OtherPUEBLO OF SAN FELIPE — $335,000 · OtherCHIMP HAVEN INC — $354,000 · Other+115 more — $7,323,279 · Other+115 moreMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC — $573,208 · PhilanthropyMORGAN ST…NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $313,000 · PhilanthropyNEW MEXIC…ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $159,311 · PhilanthropyALBUQUERQ…ARCA FOUNDATION — $140,283 · PhilanthropyARCA FOUN…SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $90,157 · PhilanthropySANTA FE …+5 more — $95,000 · Philanthropy+5 moreENLACE COMUNITARIO — $449,837 · Community ImprovementLAGUNA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $153,991 · Community ImprovementYEE HAOLNII DOO — $140,000 · Community ImprovementNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY CAPITAL — $132,500 · Community ImprovementNATIVE WOMEN LEAD INC — $100,000 · Community ImprovementNGAGE NEW MEXICO — $90,000 · Community ImprovementTAOS PUEBLO FOUNDATION — $65,000 · Community ImprovementINDIAN COUNTRY GRASSROOTS SUPPORT — $50,800 · Community Improvement+5 more — $95,645 · Community ImprovementNEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER — $288,232 · Human ServicesLAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES — $142,777 · Human ServicesNM Comunidades En Accion Y De Fe — $107,994 · Human ServicesBATTERED FAMILIES SERVICES INC — $75,678 · Human ServicesEL REFUGIO — $61,280 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF LAS CRUCES INC — $53,720 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO INC — $46,999 · Human ServicesALTA MIRA SPECIALIZED FAMILY SERVICES INC — $45,064 · Human ServicesEL CENTRO DE IGUALDAD Y DERECHOS — $41,497 · Human Services+18 more — $379,714 · Human ServicesSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT — $225,000 · Civil RightsTHE OLE EDUCATION FUND — $222,994 · Civil RightsSOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO — $148,744 · Civil RightsNEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN — $140,000 · Civil RightsSOUTHWEST WOMEN'S LAW CENTER — $90,000 · Civil RightsTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER — $36,000 · Civil Rights+1 more — $26,102 · Civil RightsTREES WATER AND PEOPLE — $225,000 · EnvironmentEARTH CARE INTERNATIONAL EARTH CARE NEW MEXICO — $225,000 · EnvironmentCOLORES UNITED — $163,148 · EnvironmentSan Juan Citizens Alliance — $100,000 · EnvironmentQUIVIRA COALITION INC — $35,000 · EnvironmentREUNITY RESOURCES — $30,000 · Environment+2 more — $33,000 · EnvironmentLOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY FOUNDATION — $265,000 · EducationREADING QUEST — $90,000 · EducationPARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOR THE SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $66,051 · EducationINSTITUTE OF AMERICAN INDIAN ARTS TRUST — $64,174 · EducationNACA-INSPIRED SCHOOLS NETWORK — $60,000 · EducationFUTURE FOCUSED EDUCATION — $45,000 · EducationCommunity Learning Network — $32,885 · EducationSt Edwards University — $28,000 · Education+7 more — $147,881 · Education
Other$9,915,229Philanthropy$1,370,959Community Improvement$1,277,773Human Services$1,242,955Civil Rights$888,840Environment$811,148Education$798,991

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEW MEXICO FUND FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS — $692,025 over 5y, 52% of budgetMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC — $573,208 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENLACE COMUNITARIO — $449,837 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetCHIMP HAVEN INC — $354,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $313,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER — $288,232 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER FUND OF NEW MEXICO — $286,233 over 7y, 9.7% of budgetCONSERVATION LEGACY — $265,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY FOUNDATION — $265,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO — $255,495 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetINDIGENOUS LIFEWAYS — $235,000 over 4y, 30% of budgetSANTA FE SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS & SCIENCES — $234,832 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT — $225,000 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetTREES WATER AND PEOPLE — $225,000 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetEARTH CARE INTERNATIONAL EARTH CARE NEW MEXICO — $225,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetTHE OLE EDUCATION FUND — $222,994 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $159,311 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetLAGUNA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $153,991 over 4y, 25% of budgetSOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO — $148,744 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetCONTIGO IMMIGRANT JUSTICE — $145,500 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetTHE SAVILA COLLABORATIVE — $145,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetLAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES — $142,777 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetARCA FOUNDATION — $140,283 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetNEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN — $140,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetYEE HAOLNII DOO — $140,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY CAPITAL — $132,500 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetWILDEARTH GUARDIANS — $123,266 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetEMBUDO VALLEY LIBRARY AND COMMUNITY CENTER — $113,287 over 6y, 11% of budgetNM Comunidades En Accion Y De Fe — $107,994 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetSan Juan Citizens Alliance — $100,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetSELF HELP INC — $98,879 over 6y, 11% of budgetGUIDANCE CENTER OF LEA COUNTY INC — $92,952 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $90,157 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetREADING QUEST — $90,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetNGAGE NEW MEXICO — $90,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetSOUTHWEST WOMEN'S LAW CENTER — $90,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetNEW MEXICO CENTER ON LAW AND POVERTY — $82,994 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCENTER FOR CIVIC POLICY — $82,994 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE SANTA FE OPERA — $80,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBATTERED FAMILIES SERVICES INC — $75,678 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetNONPROFIT LEGAL SERVICES OF UTAH — $75,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetYOUTHWORKS — $72,083 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetPARTNERS IN EDUCATION FOR THE SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $66,051 over 3y, 12% of budgetCENTER OF SOUTHWEST CULTURE INC — $65,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetTAOS PUEBLO FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 3y, 72% of budgetNATIONAL INDIAN YOUTH COUNCIL INC — $65,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetINSTITUTE OF AMERICAN INDIAN ARTS TRUST — $64,174 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetEL REFUGIO — $61,280 over 5y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW MEXICO FUND FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds ENLACE COMUNITARIO ↗
  • Who funds CHIMP HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S CANCER FUND OF NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION LEGACY ↗
  • Who funds LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds INDIGENOUS LIFEWAYS ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS & SCIENCES ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds TREES WATER AND PEOPLE ↗
  • Who funds EARTH CARE INTERNATIONAL EARTH CARE NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds THE OLE EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR INDIAN OPPORTUNITY ↗
  • Who funds COLORES UNITED ↗
  • Who funds ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LAGUNA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO ↗
  • Who funds CONTIGO IMMIGRANT JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds THE SAVILA COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds ARCA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds YEE HAOLNII DOO ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY CAPITAL ↗
  • Who funds WILDEARTH GUARDIANS ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community Fo…Con Alma Health Found…Marshall L and Perrin…Albuquerque Community…Los Alamos National L…Nusenda FoundationPnm Tnmp FoundationThornburg FoundationCommunity Foundation …Anchorum St VincentBrindle FoundationNew Mexico Fund for W…
Santa Fe Community FoundationNM176.9× affinity108 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Thornburg Foundation · Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico · Anchorum St Vincent · Brindle Foundation · New Mexico Fund for Women and Girls

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization New Mexico Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    37report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 258 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home