Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Thornburg Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
144
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$225k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$11MPublic Benefit$8.2MEnvironment$6.2MPhilanthropy$4.6MArts & Culture$4.2MFood & Nutrition$2.8MCommunity Improvement$1.0MHousing & Shelter$917kOther$0
02FY2024 · 144 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $78k
  • $10k–50k64 grants · $1.4M
  • $50k–250k60 grants · $5.0M
$25,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$179M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PREPARED TO TEACH ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS$225,000
CATALYST EDUCATION$200,000
PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR STUDIES IN DEVELOPMENT ENVIRONMENT AND SECURITY$160,405
Individual grant recipient$150,000
LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY FOUNDATION$136,000
OGALLALA LAND & WATER CONSERVANCY$130,000
PREPARED TO TEACH ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS$125,000
WATER FINANCE EXCHANGE$100,000
CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER$100,000
COMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND$100,000
THE PEW CHARITABLE TRUSTS$100,000
COMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND$100,000
NEW MEXICO IN DEPTH$100,000
GOLDEN APPLE FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING$100,000
RURAL COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CORPORATION$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $633k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COVENANT PATHWAYS: $35k → 32%FII- NATIONAL: $25k → 10%MOUNTAIN SHADOWS FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%COVENANT PATHWAYS: $35k → 32%FII-NATIONAL (UPTOGETHER): $25k → 10%COVENANT PATHWAYS: $28k → 32%DREAM TREE PROJECT: $10k → 18%COVENANT PATHWAYS: $25k → 32%COVENANT PATHWAYS: $25k → 32%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $10k → 18%COVENANT PATHWAYS: $20k → 32%MANDY'S FARM: $25k → 14%MANDY'S FARM: $25k → 14%THINK NEW MEXICO: $25k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $25k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $15k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $15k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $15k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $15k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $15k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $10k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $10k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $10k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $10k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $10k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $15k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $20k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $20k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $20k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $20k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $20k → 12%THINK NEW MEXICO: $10k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%CHAINBREAKER COLLECTIVE: $5k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%NEW MEXICO CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%REEL FATHERS: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
SD
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
NC
DC
LA
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Thornburg Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 69% of the giving stays in NM; read by stated purpose it is 76% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Thornburg Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$36M · 169 repeat orgs$4.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

169 repeat relationships — 88 still active in FY2024, 81 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

169
122

Total granted

$36M
$3.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+17%

Still filing today

70%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEnvironmentArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WL
    WESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +385% · 27% of their budget
  • CC
    COMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND
    5× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +266%
  • ND
    NATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE NM INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $900k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • NM
    NEW MEXICO SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS - A1
    one grant, 2023 · $294k
  • ND
    NM DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY & EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
    one grant, 2020 · $250k
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION
    one grant, 2019 · $175k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Leadership New Mexico

Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.

Arts & Culture
2
Northern New Mexicans Protecting Land Water and Rights Inc

Northern new mexicans protecting land water and rights strives to lessen the stress of neighborhood tensions due to lack of information and fair representation. by providing an organization whose main goal is to unite and empower the…

—
3
New Mexico Rural Electric Cooperative Association Inc

The mission of the new mexico rural electric cooperatives (nmrec) is to advance protect and advocate member interests.

—
4
Nmc Inc

New mexico consortium (nmc) integrates the needs of new mexico's research universities to build liason research between local universities and organizations. nmc builds strategic connections with scientific institutions throughout the…

Education
5
Conservation Voters New Mexico

To hold elected officials accountable for their environmental votes and to educate voters on conservation issues.

—
6
Bold Futures Nm

Bold futures nm leads policy change, research, place-based organizing, and culture shift by and for women and people of color in new mexico. bold futures nm centers the lived experiences and expertise of those most impacted by an issue,…

Human Services
7
New Mexico Humanities Council

The new mexico humanities council (nmhc) supports and conducts innovative and imaginative programs throughout the state that lead to a greater understanding of, and motivate interest in, the richness of our human experience and heritage.…

—
8
Greater Albuquerque Chamber of Commerce

The greater albuquerque chamber of commerce works every day to make our community a place where businesses can grow and prosper, where people want to raise their families and where tourists want to visit. as the voice of business since…

—
9
New Mexico Wilderness Alliance

The purpose of the new mexico wilderness alliance is to enjoy, protect, and restore wilderness in new mexico, and to conduct research and educate the public about wilderness in new mexico

Environment
10
New Mexico Perinatal Collaborative

The mission of the new mexico perinatal collaborative is to convene stakeholders to achieve health equity through the promotion of evidence- based reproductive and perinatal health practices that: increase collaboration with communities…

—
11
Northeastern New Mexico Educational Foundation Inc

To provide leadership, build partnerships and enable the innovation necessary to reestablish local food and energy production, strengthen educational systems and establish placemaking in our communities while promoting northeastern new…

Arts & Culture
12
Unm Rainforest Innovations

To support the university of new mexico as the source of innovation management, patent prosecution, and licensing of technologies developed at the university.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Holistic Manangement International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Community FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsPolicy Research and AdvocacyLocal Food System Organizat…Immigrant Worker SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Youth Development ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Food Banks and PantriesDomestic Violence ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsHealth Access Advocacy and …Youth Development CentersEquine Therapy ProgramsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Local History MuseumsElementary Literacy TutoringCommunity College Foundatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%4%<5yr12%7%5–10yr19%23%10–20yr17%28%20–35yr16%25%35–55yr18%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%1%<5yr12%6%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr17%26%20–35yr16%31%35–55yr18%12%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%2/222
the rest of the field
12%
1,111/9,418

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

212 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 212 of the 329 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
60
Early backer (in before they grew)
207/212
Grantees still filing
146/212
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NM SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS -AI — $1,960,145 · OtherNM SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS -AINEW MEXICO FIRST — $1,172,892 · OtherNEW MEXICO FIRSTCOMMON CAUSE OF NEW MEXICO — $1,025,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF SANTA FE COUNTYNM EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP — $794,051 · Other+117 more — $16,387,426 · Other+117 moreSANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $567,000 · EducationSANTA FE COMMUNI…New Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc — $486,426 · EducationNew Mexico State…UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC — $426,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NE…SANTA FE PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $401,150 · EducationSANTA FE PREPARA…TEACH PLUS INC — $335,000 · EducationTEACH PLUS INCBANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION — $325,000 · EducationCatalyst Education Inc — $322,400 · EducationLOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY FOUNDATION — $311,000 · EducationREADING QUEST — $265,000 · EducationLearning Policy Institute — $264,542 · EducationNEW MEXICO SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS - ARTS INSTITUTE — $262,500 · EducationPROTEUS FUND INC — $207,500 · Education+21 more — $1,979,614 · Education+21 moreSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,142,968 · PhilanthropySANTA FE CO…NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $847,760 · PhilanthropyNEW MEXICO …GROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC — $660,750 · PhilanthropyGROWING UP …HOLISTIC MANANGEMENT INTERNATIONAL — $383,000 · PhilanthropyHOLISTIC MA…ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $205,000 · Philanthropy+2 more — $131,000 · PhilanthropyWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE — $1,693,500 · EnvironmentWESTERN LAN…QUIVIRA COALITION INC — $535,000 · EnvironmentQUIVIRA COA…NEW MEXICO ACEQUIA ASSOCIATION — $363,000 · EnvironmentNEW MEXICO …CHAMA PEAK LAND ALLIANCE — $350,000 · EnvironmentCHAMA PEAK …NATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $207,500 · EnvironmentCLIMATE CHANGE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE — $200,000 · EnvironmentRIO GRANDE RETURN — $185,000 · EnvironmentWATER FINANCE EXCHANGE INC — $150,000 · Environment+9 more — $678,000 · Environment+9 moreCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND — $1,447,400 · Public BenefitNEW MEXICO ETHICS WATCH — $841,285 · Public BenefitISSUE ONE — $425,000 · Public Benefit+5 more — $325,000 · Public BenefitNATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE NM INC — $900,000 · Arts & CultureNew Mexico In Depth Inc — $870,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER OF SOUTHWEST CULTURE INC — $242,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $185,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL YOUNG FARMERS COALITION INC — $711,876 · Food & NutritionTHE NEW MEXICO FARMERS MARKETING ASSOCIATION — $370,200 · Food & NutritionLA SEMILLA FOOD CENTER — $202,433 · Food & NutritionROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC — $130,000 · Food & NutritionRIO GRANDE AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST — $100,000 · Food & NutritionTHREE SISTERS KITCHEN — $60,000 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $45,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$21,339,514Education$6,153,132Philanthropy$4,370,478Environment$4,362,000Public Benefit$3,038,685Arts & Culture$2,197,000Food & Nutrition$1,619,509

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,142,968 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE — $1,693,500 over 8y, 27% of budgetCOMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND — $1,447,400 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO FIRST — $1,172,892 over 6y, 44% of budgetNATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE NM INC — $900,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetNew Mexico In Depth Inc — $870,000 over 8y, 35% of budgetNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $847,760 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetNEW MEXICO ETHICS WATCH — $841,285 over 5y, 99% of budgetNATIONAL YOUNG FARMERS COALITION INC — $711,876 over 8y, 7.8% of budgetCENTRAL NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $709,112 over 6y, 9.5% of budgetGROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC — $660,750 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $567,000 over 6y, 7.7% of budgetQUIVIRA COALITION INC — $535,000 over 8y, 9.1% of budgetNew Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc — $486,426 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC — $485,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC — $426,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetISSUE ONE — $425,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetSANTA FE PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $401,150 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetHOLISTIC MANANGEMENT INTERNATIONAL — $383,000 over 7y, 7.2% of budgetTHE NEW MEXICO FARMERS MARKETING ASSOCIATION — $370,200 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetNEW MEXICO TECH FOUNDATION — $368,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetNEW MEXICO ACEQUIA ASSOCIATION — $363,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetGOLDEN APPLE FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING — $355,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetCHAMA PEAK LAND ALLIANCE — $350,000 over 7y, 18% of budgetELECTION REFORMERS NETWORK INC — $345,000 over 3y, 42% of budgetTHEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC — $335,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetTEACH PLUS INC — $335,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetBANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION — $325,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCatalyst Education Inc — $322,400 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetLOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY FOUNDATION — $311,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetFAIRVOTE — $298,500 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetPNM TNMP FOUNDATION — $289,883 over 2y, 38% of budgetREADING QUEST — $265,000 over 8y, 13% of budgetLearning Policy Institute — $264,542 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS - ARTS INSTITUTE — $262,500 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN BIRD OBSERVATORY — $250,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetCAREER GUIDANCE INSTITUTE — $245,000 over 2y, 84% of budgetCENTER OF SOUTHWEST CULTURE INC — $242,000 over 7y, 5.7% of budgetPROTEUS FUND INC — $207,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $207,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $205,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetLA SEMILLA FOOD CENTER — $202,433 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetWilliams College — $200,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHINK NEW MEXICO — $200,000 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetSHATTUCK-ST MARY'S SCHOOL — $200,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF FONDATION DE FRANCE INC — $200,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetCLIMATE CHANGE LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE — $200,000 over 6y, 49% of budgetSEARCHLIGHT NEW MEXICO NEWS — $197,250 over 3y, 15% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds COMMON CAUSE EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO FIRST ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE NM INC ↗
  • Who funds New Mexico In Depth Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO ETHICS WATCH ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL YOUNG FARMERS COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GROWING UP NEW MEXICOINC ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds QUIVIRA COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds New Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ISSUE ONE ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE PREPARATORY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HOLISTIC MANANGEMENT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW MEXICO FARMERS MARKETING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO TECH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO ACEQUIA ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN APPLE FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING ↗
  • Who funds CHAMA PEAK LAND ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds ELECTION REFORMERS NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THEODORE ROOSEVELT CONSERVATION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds TEACH PLUS INC ↗
  • Who funds BANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds Catalyst Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FAIRVOTE ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community Fo…Marshall L and Perrin…Anchorum St VincentCon Alma Health Found…Albuquerque Community…Los Alamos National L…Pnm Tnmp FoundationNusenda FoundationThe Frost FoundationNew Mexico Community …St Vincent HospitalNancy Ann Mellen Foun…
Santa Fe Community FoundationNM159.9× affinity91 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Anchorum St Vincent · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · The Frost Foundation · New Mexico Community Foundation · St Vincent Hospital · Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Thornburg Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
  • Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association in — 9% of income from government
  • Consensus Building Institute Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Nantucket Historical Association — 1% of income from government
  • Lynn University Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Williams College — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
46report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Thornburg Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Thornburg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 329 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines