Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$9.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
304
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$5.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0174% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.

Human Services$7.9MHealth$7.2MFood & Nutrition$1.4MHousing & Shelter$959kEducation$944kPhilanthropy$579kCrime & Legal$435kRecreation & Sports$300kReligion$295kOther$8.7M
02FY2024 · 304 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k56 grants · $251k
  • $10k–50k244 grants · $4.2M
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $326k
  • $250k+1 grant · $5.0M
$15,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$64M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Texas Children's Hospital$5,000,000
Albuquerque Sign Language Academy$226,000
Emergency Infant Services$50,000
Bastrop Co Emerg Food Pantry$50,000
RestoreOKC$45,000
Pegasus Legal Services for Children$40,000
All Ears Listening and Language Cen$40,000
Cookson Hills Christian School$40,000
Respite Care of San Antonio$40,000
Presbyterian Ear Institute$35,000
Youth Heartline$35,000
Paws and Stripes$34,750
Dar A Luz Birth Health Ctr$32,000
Undies For Everyone$30,000
Camp Phoenix$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $6.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Meals on Wheels Senior Services: $75k → 5%Connections Individual Family Srvcs: $30k → 10%Down Home Ranch: $58k → 12%East Texas Sheltering Arms Coalitio: $30k → 17%Meals on Wheels Senior Services: $30k → 5%Odessa Family YMCA: $35k → 16%CENTRAL TEXAS CHILDREN'S HOME: $30k → 10%Good Samaritan Community Services: $40k → 16%House of Neighborly Service: $35k → 16%Brookwood In Georgetown Vocational: $155k → 6%ChildSafe: $40k → 16%Austin Groups for the Elderly: $35k → 10%Austin Groups for the Elderly: $30k → 10%AUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY: $30k → 10%Respite Care of San Antonio: $40k → 16%Respite Care of San Antonio: $30k → 16%Respite Care of San Antonio: $30k → 16%Helping Hand Home for Children: $30k → 10%Family Eldercare Inc: $30k → 10%Las Cumbres Community Services: $40k → 18%Sacramento Mountains Senior Service: $58k → 20%Bethel Community Storehouse: $42k → 20%Childhaven: $50k → 22%Little Sisters of the Poor of NM: $49k → 32%Peppers Ranch: $73k → 12%Emergency Infant Services: $50k → 14%Home of Hope: $65k → 21%CHILDHAVEN INC: $35k → 22%Avenues Early Childhood Services: $36k → 32%Home of Hope: $55k → 21%CHILDHAVEN INC: $35k → 22%Cookson Hills Christian School: $40k → 18%Childhaven: $35k → 22%Cookson Hills Christian School: $35k → 18%Casa de Peregrinos: $35k → 23%Abrazos Family Support Services: $30k → 10%Avenues Early Childhood Services: $49k → 32%Hearts for Hearing Foundation: $30k → 16%Hearts for Hearing Foundation: $30k → 16%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION: $30k → 16%Infant Crisis Services: $35k → 16%La Plaza de Encuentro Gathering Pla: $54k → 14%OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR THE DISABLED: $50k → 16%La Plaza de Encuentro Gathering Pla: $49k → 14%DVRC Inc: $35k → 14%New Day: $56k → 14%ALL FAITHS: $250k → 14%All Faiths: $34k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
MT
NV
IN
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
NM
OK
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 63% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 61% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$25M · 348 repeat orgs$3.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

348 repeat relationships — 227 still active in FY2024, 121 since wound down; 75 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

348
235

Total granted

$25M
$2.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+19%

Still filing today

78%
66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $709k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    Texas Children's Hospital
    2× · 2023–2024 · $5.0M · revenue +0%
  • A NEW LEAF INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $365k · revenue +56%
  • U
    UNICA
    4× · 2020–2024 · $324k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • AC
    Austin Community College Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue +56%
  • HC
    HILL COUNTRY FAITH MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $44k
  • LC
    LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue +51%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lone Star Casa Inc

Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…

Civil Rights
2
Guadalupe County Children's Advocacy Center

To advocate for and provide services to children and families when there are allegations of abuse and neglect throughout the investigation,prosecution, treatment, and prevention of child abuse, and to reduce the trauma to childrent with…

Crime & Legal
3
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
4
Casa of South Texas Inc

Child Advocacy

Human Services
5
Court Appointed Special Advocates of Hidalgo Count

To provide services for the protection of abused and neglected children that are in the custody of the State of Texas.

Civil Rights
6
Shelter Agencies for Families in East Texas

To provide shelter to abused families.

Human Services
7
Meals On Wheels of Odessa Inc

Meals on Wheels of Odessa enables people to live with dignity by offering community support and sustenance through coordinated services and enable older adults to live in their own homes safely and independently as long as they are able.

—
8
El Paso Center for Children Inc

El paso center for children, inc's purpose is to provide homes for dependent and neglected children and an array of support services for emotionally disturbed children, adolescents, and their families. the organization operates entirely in…

—
9
Meals On Wheels and More Inc

To nourish and enrich the lives of the homebound and other people in need through programs that promote dignity and independent living.

Food & Nutrition
10
Court Appointed Special Advocates in the Heart of Texas

Training and supporting quality volunteers who speak out for the best interest of abused and neglected children in court in an effort to find each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights
11
Community Homes for Adults Inc

Provide programs and services to enable adults with intellectual disabilities to live full, rich lives in a safe environment and to meaningfully participate in the community.

Human Services
12
Bluebonnet Childrens Center

To protect and enhance the quality of life for abused and neglected children in Medina, Real and Uvalde Counties of Texas.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Opportunity Center for the Homeless and the most unlike its peers is Memory Care Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Community College Foundatio…Pregnancy Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterJewish Community Organizati…United Way AffiliatesLocal Food System Organizat…Youth Development ServicesCommunity Arts CentersPublic Library OperationsChristian Youth CampsYouth Mentoring ProgramsEnvironmental Conservation …Military Veterans SupportVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…School District FoundationsChristian Missionary Organi…Cancer Support ServicesAddiction Recovery ServicesAffordable Housing Developm…Ymca Youth DevelopmentCommunity Food PantriesFaith-Based Social ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsDomestic Violence ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Equine Therapy ProgramsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Youth Sports ProgramsYouth Development CentersImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity FoundationsSenior Support ServicesFood Banks and PantriesDevelopmental Disabilities …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%3%<5yr16%10%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr10%31%35–55yr13%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%1%<5yr16%5%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr16%38%20–35yr10%28%35–55yr13%15%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.9%5/525
the rest of the field
15%
20,229/136,279

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

495 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 495 of the 665 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
130
Early backer (in before they grew)
483/495
Grantees still filing
315/495
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Texas Children's Hospital — $5,015,000 · HealthTexas Children's Hospital+22 more — $1,638,800 · Health+22 moreUNICA — $324,000 · Human ServicesUNICABROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC — $203,800 · Human Services+63 more — $5,349,270 · Human Services+63 moreA NEW LEAF INC — $365,000 · OtherA NEW LEAF INC+77 more — $5,560,450 · Other+77 moreRIO GRANDE FOOD PROJECT — $115,000 · Food & NutritionMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc — $115,000 · Food & NutritionMeals on Wheels of Norman Inc — $110,000 · Food & NutritionEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER — $105,000 · Food & NutritionMeals on Wheels New Mexico — $86,500 · Food & NutritionTHE COMMUNITY PANTRY — $86,000 · Food & NutritionTEXAS BEEF INITIATIVE — $85,000 · Food & NutritionHILL COUNTRY DAILY BREAD — $85,000 · Food & NutritionRAINBOW SENIOR CENTER — $65,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS MINISTRY INC — $65,000 · Food & NutritionFood Bank of West Central Texas — $60,000 · Food & NutritionFood on the Move Inc — $45,000 · Food & NutritionBE KIND SAN ANTONIO INC — $45,000 · Food & NutritionSTOREHOUSE NEW MEXICO — $42,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF EASTERN NEW MEXICO — $41,000 · Food & NutritionAlbuquerque Sign Language Academy — $249,000 · EducationTEAMABILITY INC — $95,000 · EducationMAINSPRING SCHOOLS INC — $80,000 · EducationBYNUM SCHOOL — $78,000 · EducationTurtle Wing Foundation — $70,000 · EducationAustin Community College Foundation — $60,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CENTRAL TEXAS — $55,000 · EducationC A M P UNIVERSITY — $52,500 · EducationSAN MARCOS LIONS CHARITIES INC — $47,500 · EducationVELA — $45,000 · EducationSARANAM LLC — $305,000 · Housing & ShelterGEARY GIRLS RANCHNORTH dba GEARY FOSTER FOUNDATIONS — $125,000 · Housing & ShelterTEXAS RAMP PROJECT — $120,000 · Housing & ShelterSAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION — $60,000 · Housing & ShelterHEADING HOME — $47,000 · Housing & ShelterHabitat for Humanity of Smith County — $45,000 · Housing & ShelterALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $188,400 · PhilanthropyUndies for Everyone — $140,000 · PhilanthropyAUSTIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $41,000 · Philanthropy
Health$6,653,800Human Services$5,877,070Other$5,925,450Food & Nutrition$1,150,500Education$832,000Housing & Shelter$702,000Philanthropy$369,400

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTexas Children's Hospital — $5,015,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetA NEW LEAF INC — $365,000 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetUNICA — $324,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetSARANAM LLC — $305,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetAlbuquerque Sign Language Academy — $249,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetBROOKWOOD IN GEORGETOWN VOCATIONAL INC — $203,800 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetHOME OF HOPE INC — $190,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $188,400 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDHAVEN INC — $180,600 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetCasa Esperanza Inc — $160,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS SENIOR SERVICES — $150,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetRESTOREOKC INC — $145,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetAUSTIN SPEECH LABS INC — $140,300 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE — $140,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetUndies for Everyone — $140,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetHearts for Hearing Foundation — $135,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetLA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE — $130,500 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF SAN ANTONIO INC — $130,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetCASA DE PEREGRINOS — $129,100 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetGEARY GIRLS RANCHNORTH dba GEARY FOSTER FOUNDATIONS — $125,000 over 4y, 36% of budgetCOOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $123,200 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetAustin Child Guidance Center — $122,700 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetTEXAS RAMP PROJECT — $120,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetSPECIAL CARE INC — $120,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetRespite Care of San Antonio Inc — $120,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTITUS COUNTY CARES INC DBA TITUS COUNTY CARES — $120,000 over 4y, 9.5% of budgetCUIDANDO LOS NIOS INC — $119,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetA NEW DAY INC — $116,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetHouse of Neighborly Service of San Antonio Texas — $115,500 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetSunshine House Inc — $115,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetRIO GRANDE FOOD PROJECT — $115,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetAUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY — $115,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc — $115,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetPEPPERS RANCH INC — $112,500 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetSACRAMENTO MOUNTAINS SENIOR SERVICES — $110,600 over 5y, 16% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Norman Inc — $110,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC — $110,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetEmergency Infant Services Inc — $110,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetEL PASOANS FIGHTING HUNGER — $105,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS AND STRIPES INC — $104,750 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetBETHEL COMMUNITY STOREHOUSE — $104,000 over 4y, 8.6% of budgetLittle Sisters of the Poor of NM Inc — $103,750 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetDOWN HOME RANCH INC — $103,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetSOUTH CENTRAL INDUSTRIES INC — $103,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCONNECTIONS INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $100,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetST FELIX PANTRY INC — $97,500 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetCHILDSAFE — $95,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR FRONTIER CO — $95,000 over 3y, 12% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Harvey E Najim Charit…Albuquerque Community…The Moody FoundationCon Alma Health Found…Sarkeys FoundationJe and le Mabee Found…Pnm Tnmp FoundationSt David's FoundationFaye L & William L Co…Santa Fe Community Fo…St Luke's Lutheran He…United Way for Greate…
Harvey E Najim Charitable FoundationTX93.1× affinity51 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · St David's Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · St Luke's Lutheran Health Ministries Inc · United Way for Greater Austin

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Sunbeam Family Services Inc — 52% of income from government
  • Domestic Violence Intervention Services — 15% of income from government
  • Youth Services of Tulsa Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Remerge Inc — 7% of income from government
  • Pivot Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Special Care Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
88report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 665 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines