· Private foundation
Con Alma Health Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k20 grants · $88k
- $10k–50k36 grants · $938k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO | $46,250 |
| FOOD BANK OF EASTERN NEW MEXICO | $45,000 |
| FOOD DEPOT | $40,000 |
| NATIONAL LATINO BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION | $32,500 |
| HEALTHY NATIVE COMMUNITIES PARTNERSHIP INC | $30,000 |
| SOLACE CRISIS TREATMENT CENTER | $30,000 |
| ESPERANZA SHELTER INC | $30,000 |
| COLLINS LAKE AUTISM CENTER | $30,000 |
| CHAVES COUNTY CASA PROGRAM | $30,000 |
| JARDIN DE LOS NINOS | $30,000 |
| MANDY'S SPECIAL FARM | $30,000 |
| NEW MEXICO RAMP PROJECT | $30,000 |
| CHRONIC DISEASE PREVENTION COUNCIL | $30,000 |
| VALENCIA SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE | $30,000 |
| LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +73% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
144 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 113 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $307k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC7× · 2017–2024 · $270k · revenue +62%- JAJUSTICE ACCESS SUPPORT AND SOLUTIONS FOR HEALTH5× · 2019–2023 · $201k · revenue +106%
- NMNEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER5× · 2020–2024 · $167k · revenue +174%
Funded once
- USUNITED SOUTH BROADWAY CORPORATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $44k · revenue +162%
- TCTaos County Economic Development Corpgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $33k · revenue +99%
- CDCASA DE PEREGRINOSone grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue -22%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The casa program is a community-based program that recruits, trains and supports citizen-volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in courtrooms and communities. the organization serves children in…
Bold futures nm leads policy change, research, place-based organizing, and culture shift by and for women and people of color in new mexico. bold futures nm centers the lived experiences and expertise of those most impacted by an issue,…
Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.
Provide respectful high quality legal advice, counsel, brief services and referral to low-income New Mexicans and help remove barriers to the civil justice system.
Social and emotional learning (SEL) is integral to human development and education. Through reliable developmental relationships, young people learn who they are and imagine who they might become as healthy, contributing adults in their…
La Casa de Buena Salud, Inc. doing business as La Casa Family Health Center and doing business as La Casa Community Behavioral Health is an innovative, community-based financially resourceful, total health care organization committed to…
The mission of NMCNE is to advance and engage the nursing community to promote excellence and improve the health of all New Mexicans.
New mexico dream center's mission is to restore the dreams of the hopeless, the helpless, the hurting and the broken. specifically, albuquerque new mexico has a huge gaping hole in services for homeless youth and trafficked minor children.…
To increase access to justice by supporting and expanding free civil legal services for low-income new mexicans. for 35 years, equal access to justice has been providing unrestricted, noncompetitive funds to legal aid organizations who…
Sas works in northwest new mexico and the surrounding four corners area to empower victims, provide crisis services and create a community focused on prevention.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Center On Law and Poverty and the most unlike its peers is Indigenous Women Rising Indigeous Women Rising. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
232 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 232 of the 328 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JUSTICE ACCESS SUPPORT AND SOLUTIONS FOR HEALTH ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO CENTER ON LAW AND POVERTY ↗
- Who funds HEALTH ACTION NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO BLACK LEADERSHIP COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds SOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO ↗
- Who funds SEARCHLIGHT NEW MEXICO NEWS ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THINK NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE RECOVERY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds NGAGE NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
- Who funds GROUNDWORKS NEW MEXICO KRISTI DORR ↗
- Who funds THREE SISTERS KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds ZUNI YOUTH ENRICHMENT PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ENLACE COMUNITARIO ↗
- Who funds THE SAVILA COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds CHAINBREAKER COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds MANDY'S SPECIAL FARM ↗
- Who funds SCOTT'S HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds MESA TO MESA ↗
- Who funds Inside Out ↗
- Who funds Healthy Native Communities Partnership I ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF EASTERN NM ↗
- Who funds NACA-INSPIRED SCHOOLS NETWORK ↗
- Who funds LA PLAZA DE ENCUENTRO GATHERING PLACE ↗
- Who funds NEW ENERGY ECONOMY INC ↗
- Who funds INDIGENOUS LIFEWAYS ↗
- Who funds RIO GRANDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO ↗
- Who funds INDIAN PUEBLO CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds LOS ALAMOS JUVENILE JUSTICE ADVISORY BOARD INC ↗
- Who funds VALENCIA SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds THE COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · New Mexico Community Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Brindle Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Anchorum St Vincent · Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico · Thornburg Foundation · New Mexico Fund for Women and Girls · Pnm Tnmp Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Con Alma Health Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.