· Community foundation
New Mexico Community Trust
To build, invest and manage endowment funds to enhance the quality of new mexico through informed, strategic grantmaking.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k18 grants · $446k
- $50k–250k22 grants · $2.3M
- $250k+4 grants · $2.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNM PATHWAYS - THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO | $863,005 |
| NEW MEXICO LEGAL AID | $777,621 |
| NAEVA | $294,500 |
| SILVER CONSOLIDATED SCHOOLS | $250,000 |
| DREAMTREE PROJECT - TAOS NEST | $234,986 |
| NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER | $218,281 |
| CULTIVATING CODERS | $150,000 |
| ST ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION | $148,765 |
| NEW MEXICO BLACK LEADERSHIP COUNCIL | $138,518 |
| NEW MEXICO WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS DEPT | $130,125 |
| COMPUTER SCIENCE ALLIANCE | $110,000 |
| LEVADO | $105,000 |
| NEW MEXICO ASSOCIATION FOR THE EDUCATION OF YOUNG CHILDREN | $100,000 |
| ONE GENERATION (FISCALLY SPONSORED BY TIDES CENTER) | $100,000 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SOUTHERN NM | $95,984 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
42 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $708k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NMNEW MEXICO LEGAL AID INC2× · 2023–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +9%
CENTER OF SOUTHWEST CULTURE INC3× · 2022–2024 · $659k · revenue +16%- TLTHE LIFE LINK3× · 2022–2024 · $578k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- ESEsperanza Shelter Incone grant, 2022 · $826k · revenue +52%
- CCCARMICHAEL CONSULTANTSone grant, 2022 · $392k
- NMNEW MEXICO EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION AND CARE DEPARTMENTone grant, 2023 · $227k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The casa program is a community-based program that recruits, trains and supports citizen-volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in courtrooms and communities. the organization serves children in…
The new mexico housing and community development corporation is successfully promoting the availability and quality of affordable housing for moderate and low income families throughout new mexico through the means of property…
New mexico aids services, inc provides housing, education and nutritional support to the public in response to the aids crisis.
Social and emotional learning (SEL) is integral to human development and education. Through reliable developmental relationships, young people learn who they are and imagine who they might become as healthy, contributing adults in their…
Nmcan partners with young people to build community, promote equity and lead change.
Casa fortaleza provides advocacy, case management services, therapy, and outreach to victims/survivors of sexual violence.
Provide respectful high quality legal advice, counsel, brief services and referral to low-income New Mexicans and help remove barriers to the civil justice system.
New mexico dream center's mission is to restore the dreams of the hopeless, the helpless, the hurting and the broken. specifically, albuquerque new mexico has a huge gaping hole in services for homeless youth and trafficked minor children.…
As the voice of the building industry, the new mexico construction alliance seeks to support the community and local businesses by providing educational opportunities, advocating for the regulations that benefit a strong housing market,…
The organization is dedicated to improving the quality of life for New Mexicans who suffer from mental illness.
Cplc new mexico, inc. is dedicated to improving the economic well-being and quality of life for low-income residents of northern new mexico, while seeking to preserve the area's unique cultural, historical and social traditions and way of…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Esperanza Shelter Inc and the most unlike its peers is Marshall L and Perrine D Mccune Charitable Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEW MEXICO LEGAL AID INC ↗
- Who funds TENDERLOVE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Esperanza Shelter Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTER OF SOUTHWEST CULTURE INC ↗
- Who funds THE LIFE LINK ↗
- Who funds SAINT ELIZABETH SHELTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO BLACK LEADERSHIP COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds THE SAVILA COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER ↗
- Who funds ENLACE COMUNITARIO ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY OF SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO INC ↗
- Who funds HOPEWORKS ↗
- Who funds YES HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds CULTIVATING CODERS INC ↗
- Who funds CASA MILAGRO ↗
- Who funds NAEVA ↗
- Who funds DREAM TREE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
- Who funds MOVING ARTS ESPANOLA INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds Arizona Native Asset Coalition Corporation ↗
- Who funds SAN JUAN COUNTY PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds COMPUTER SCIENCE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds EAST CENTRAL MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds New Mexico Association for the Education of Young Children ↗
- Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds LAS CUMBRES COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF LEA COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds R4CREATING ↗
- Who funds Innovate-Educate ↗
- Who funds AMPARO ↗
- Who funds CUIDANDO LOS NIOS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Nusenda Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · New Mexico Community Foundation · Anchorum St Vincent · Thornburg Foundation · Brindle Foundation · St Vincent Hospital · WK Kellogg Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New Mexico Community Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to New Mexico Community Trust?
Find your warmest path to New Mexico Community Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.