· Private foundation
Pnm Tnmp Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k120 grants · $530k
- $10k–50k45 grants · $530k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $258k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| VOLUNTEER GRANTS LESS THAN 2000 | $71,550 |
| OTHER - ACCRUAL TO CASH | $56,749 |
| MATCHING GRANTS LESS THAN 2000 | $55,186 |
| ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| TENDERLOVE COMMUNITY CENTER INC | $15,000 |
| BEST BUDDIES NEW MEXICO | $15,000 |
| JEREMIAHS PLACE | $15,000 |
| THE STREET FOOD INSTITUTE | $15,000 |
| UA LOCAL 412 PLUMBERS & PIPEFITTERS UNION | $15,000 |
| ALBUQUERQUE SIGN LANGUAGE ACADEMY | $15,000 |
| INSPIREMPOWER NEW MEXICO | $15,000 |
| LOVE INC OF OTERO COUNTY | $15,000 |
| QUELAB | $15,000 |
| DEMING LUNA COUNTY ECON DEVELOPMENT CORP | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 14% of Pnm Tnmp Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 86% of the giving stays in NM; read by stated purpose it is 73% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
206 repeat relationships — 83 still active in FY2024, 123 since wound down; 59 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $480k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CICNM INGENUITY INC4× · 2017–2020 · $440k · revenue +58%
- NMNew Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc6× · 2017–2024 · $320k · revenue +131%
- AHALBUQUERQUE HISPANO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE3× · 2017–2019 · $260k · revenue +45%
Funded once
- NMNEW MEXICO BIOPARK SOCIETY INCone grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue +12%
- UWUnited Way of Brazoria Countyone grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -43%
- UWUNITED WAY GALVESTON COUNTY MAINLAND INCone grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue -37%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The casa program is a community-based program that recruits, trains and supports citizen-volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in courtrooms and communities. the organization serves children in…
New mexico dream center's mission is to restore the dreams of the hopeless, the helpless, the hurting and the broken. specifically, albuquerque new mexico has a huge gaping hole in services for homeless youth and trafficked minor children.…
Provide respectful high quality legal advice, counsel, brief services and referral to low-income New Mexicans and help remove barriers to the civil justice system.
To assist communities to create solutions to homelessness from prevention through permanent housing by using action, advocacy, and awareness.
Cplc new mexico, inc. is dedicated to improving the economic well-being and quality of life for low-income residents of northern new mexico, while seeking to preserve the area's unique cultural, historical and social traditions and way of…
The new mexico housing and community development corporation is successfully promoting the availability and quality of affordable housing for moderate and low income families throughout new mexico through the means of property…
Social and emotional learning (SEL) is integral to human development and education. Through reliable developmental relationships, young people learn who they are and imagine who they might become as healthy, contributing adults in their…
As the voice of the building industry, the new mexico construction alliance seeks to support the community and local businesses by providing educational opportunities, advocating for the regulations that benefit a strong housing market,…
The Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico serves as a community resource, connects donors to needs, and supports charitable organizations in their work.
Provide emergency shelter care for adult persons and their children who are victims of domestic violence, and educate the community about the problems related to domestic violence is all its forms.
To provide leadership, build partnerships and enable the innovation necessary to reestablish local food and energy production, strengthen educational systems and establish placemaking in our communities while promoting northeastern new…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Center On Law and Poverty and the most unlike its peers is Grace of Giving. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
299 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 299 of the 508 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CNM INGENUITY INC ↗
- Who funds New Mexico State Univ Fdn Inc ↗
- Who funds ALBUQUERQUE HISPANO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY TEAM CORP ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds ADELANTE DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC ↗
- Who funds RIO GRANDE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CO ↗
- Who funds CULTIVATING CODERS INC ↗
- Who funds SANTA FE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HOPEWORKS ↗
- Who funds TENDERLOVE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF NEW MEXICO TRAILS INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FATHERS BUILDING FUTURES ↗
- Who funds SARANAM LLC ↗
- Who funds 516 Arts ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds HEADING HOME ↗
- Who funds EL REFUGIO ↗
- Who funds LOVE INC OF OTERO COUNTY ↗
- Who funds REUNITY RESOURCES ↗
- Who funds ST FELIX PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds PROSPERITY WORKS ↗
- Who funds LENSIC PERFORMING ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE NM INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · New Mexico Community Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation · Thornburg Foundation · Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation · The Frost Foundation · Lineberry Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pnm Tnmp Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.